Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Pain Management Approaches for Sternotomy in Cardiac Surgeries-Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block vs Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hemant Vanjare, Chetana Prakash Deshmukh, Swapnil Kumar Barasker, Akheela Mohamed Kassim, Bipin Arya
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Pain Management Approaches for Sternotomy in Cardiac Surgeries-Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block vs Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block.","authors":"Hemant Vanjare, Chetana Prakash Deshmukh, Swapnil Kumar Barasker, Akheela Mohamed Kassim, Bipin Arya","doi":"10.31486/toj.24.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management after sternotomy in cardiac surgery is vital for recovery. Opioids are commonly used, but they carry risk. Central neuraxial techniques and nerve blocks are options for a multimodality approach. Fascial plane blocks such as the transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTMPB) and the pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) are a relatively new way to relieve pain, and their popularity has increased with the use of ultrasound for precise anatomic visualization. Because the effectiveness of both blocks is similar, we conducted this study to compare the pain management of the TTMPB and the PIFB after sternotomy in cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized double-blind study included 118 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. In the TTMPB group (n=59), 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected bilaterally using ultrasound assistance in the transversus thoracic plane. In the PIFB group (n=59), 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected in the pecto-intercostal plane. Study outcomes were opioid consumption in the first 24 hours and pain scores at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient characteristics in the 2 groups were similar. Opioid consumption was similar in both groups (<i>P</i>=0.672), and we found no difference in pain scores between the 2 groups at any of the time intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TTMPB and the PIFB were similarly effective in treating acute poststernotomy pain in our patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47600,"journal":{"name":"Ochsner Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochsner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.24.0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain management after sternotomy in cardiac surgery is vital for recovery. Opioids are commonly used, but they carry risk. Central neuraxial techniques and nerve blocks are options for a multimodality approach. Fascial plane blocks such as the transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTMPB) and the pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) are a relatively new way to relieve pain, and their popularity has increased with the use of ultrasound for precise anatomic visualization. Because the effectiveness of both blocks is similar, we conducted this study to compare the pain management of the TTMPB and the PIFB after sternotomy in cardiac surgery.

Methods: This randomized double-blind study included 118 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. In the TTMPB group (n=59), 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected bilaterally using ultrasound assistance in the transversus thoracic plane. In the PIFB group (n=59), 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected in the pecto-intercostal plane. Study outcomes were opioid consumption in the first 24 hours and pain scores at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.

Results: Patient characteristics in the 2 groups were similar. Opioid consumption was similar in both groups (P=0.672), and we found no difference in pain scores between the 2 groups at any of the time intervals.

Conclusion: The TTMPB and the PIFB were similarly effective in treating acute poststernotomy pain in our patient population.

超声引导胸骨切开术疼痛管理方法的比较分析——胸经肌平面阻滞与胸肋间筋膜阻滞。
背景:胸骨切开术后的疼痛处理对心脏手术的康复至关重要。阿片类药物被广泛使用,但它们有风险。中枢神经轴技术和神经阻滞是多模式入路的选择。筋膜平面阻滞,如胸横肌平面阻滞(TTMPB)和胸肋间筋膜阻滞(PIFB)是一种相对较新的缓解疼痛的方法,随着超声精确解剖可视化的使用,它们的普及程度越来越高。由于两种阻滞的效果相似,我们进行了这项研究,比较了胸骨切开术后TTMPB和PIFB的疼痛管理。方法:这项随机双盲研究包括118例接受心脏手术的患者。在TTMPB组(n=59)中,在超声辅助下在胸横平面双侧注射20 mL 0.2%罗哌卡因。PIFB组(n=59)在胸肋间平面注射0.2%罗哌卡因20 mL。研究结果是前24小时的阿片类药物消耗和术后0、3、6、12和24小时的疼痛评分。结果:两组患者特征相似。两组的阿片类药物用量相似(P=0.672),两组在任何时间间隔的疼痛评分均无差异。结论:TTMPB和PIFB在治疗急性胸骨切开术后疼痛方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ochsner Journal
Ochsner Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Ochsner Journal is a quarterly publication designed to support Ochsner"s mission to improve the health of our community through a commitment to innovation in healthcare, medical research, and education. The Ochsner Journal provides an active dialogue on practice standards in today"s changing healthcare environment. Emphasis will be given to topics of great societal and medical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信