Significance of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Predicting Short-Term Survival Among Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prognostic Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ccrp/5511135
Sukrisd Koowattanatianchai, Patchara Kochaiyapatana, Narueporn Eungsuwat, Vimonsri Rangsrisaeneepitak, Katkanit Thammakumpee, Kiraphol Kaladee
{"title":"Significance of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Predicting Short-Term Survival Among Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prognostic Analysis.","authors":"Sukrisd Koowattanatianchai, Patchara Kochaiyapatana, Narueporn Eungsuwat, Vimonsri Rangsrisaeneepitak, Katkanit Thammakumpee, Kiraphol Kaladee","doi":"10.1155/ccrp/5511135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study sought to evaluate the association between right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and short-term in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis and septic shock. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients admitted at Burapha University Hospital for sepsis and septic shock from October 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023, who underwent echocardiography within 72 h after admission. RV dysfunction and other echocardiographic findings were analyzed and defined using the American Society of Echocardiography criteria. The primary outcome examined in this study was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included maximal blood lactate levels, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. <b>Results:</b> A total of 104 patients (mean age: 69.54 ± 14.88 years) were enrolled in this study. Among the included patients, 32 (30.8%) developed septic shock whereas 20 (19.2%) exhibited RV dysfunction. Cox regression analysis showed that patients with RV dysfunction had a 28-day in-hospital mortality rate 5.53 times higher than that of patients with normal RV function (95% confidence intervals: 1.98-15.42; <i>p</i>=0.001). Regarding the secondary outcomes, patients with RV dysfunction exhibited a significantly higher mean serum lactate level (5.72 ± 4.96 vs. 3.74 ± 3.29 mmol/L; <i>p</i>=0.034) and length of ICU stay (6.50 ± 2.86 vs. 2.84 ± 1.56 days; <i>p</i>=0.020) than did those with normal RV function. <b>Conclusions:</b> RV dysfunction was associated with increased short-term mortality among patients with sepsis and septic shock. Assessing RV function among these patients facilitates precise prognostication and aids in guiding treatment strategies aimed at reducing mortality. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06193109.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5511135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ccrp/5511135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to evaluate the association between right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and short-term in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis and septic shock. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients admitted at Burapha University Hospital for sepsis and septic shock from October 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023, who underwent echocardiography within 72 h after admission. RV dysfunction and other echocardiographic findings were analyzed and defined using the American Society of Echocardiography criteria. The primary outcome examined in this study was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included maximal blood lactate levels, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 104 patients (mean age: 69.54 ± 14.88 years) were enrolled in this study. Among the included patients, 32 (30.8%) developed septic shock whereas 20 (19.2%) exhibited RV dysfunction. Cox regression analysis showed that patients with RV dysfunction had a 28-day in-hospital mortality rate 5.53 times higher than that of patients with normal RV function (95% confidence intervals: 1.98-15.42; p=0.001). Regarding the secondary outcomes, patients with RV dysfunction exhibited a significantly higher mean serum lactate level (5.72 ± 4.96 vs. 3.74 ± 3.29 mmol/L; p=0.034) and length of ICU stay (6.50 ± 2.86 vs. 2.84 ± 1.56 days; p=0.020) than did those with normal RV function. Conclusions: RV dysfunction was associated with increased short-term mortality among patients with sepsis and septic shock. Assessing RV function among these patients facilitates precise prognostication and aids in guiding treatment strategies aimed at reducing mortality. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06193109.

右室功能障碍对脓毒症和感染性休克患者短期生存的预测意义:一项预后分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估脓毒症和感染性休克患者右心室功能障碍与短期住院死亡率之间的关系。方法:对2022年10月1日至2023年6月30日在Burapha大学医院因败血症和脓毒性休克入院的成年患者进行前瞻性队列研究,这些患者在入院后72小时内接受了超声心动图检查。根据美国超声心动图学会的标准,分析和定义左室功能障碍和其他超声心动图结果。本研究检查的主要结局是28天住院死亡率。次要结局包括最大血乳酸水平、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和机械通气持续时间。结果:共纳入104例患者,平均年龄69.54±14.88岁。其中32例(30.8%)出现脓毒性休克,20例(19.2%)出现右心室功能障碍。Cox回归分析显示,右心室功能障碍患者28天住院死亡率是右心室功能正常患者的5.53倍(95%可信区间:1.98 ~ 15.42;p = 0.001)。次要结局方面,右心室功能障碍患者的平均血清乳酸水平显著高于对照组(5.72±4.96 vs. 3.74±3.29 mmol/L;p=0.034), ICU住院天数(6.50±2.86∶2.84±1.56);p=0.020)。结论:右心室功能障碍与脓毒症和感染性休克患者的短期死亡率增加有关。评估这些患者的右心室功能有助于精确预测,并有助于指导旨在降低死亡率的治疗策略。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06193109。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信