Use of Rapid Qualitative Analysis to Support Collaborative Synergy Within a Community Coalition for Health Equity in Detroit.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2024.0160
Hayley S Thompson, Ten-Niah Kinney, Carrie Leach, Alexandra Sass, Ariel Washington, Rhonda Dailey, Elizabeth Towner, Alyssa Beavers, Rodlescia Sneed, Karen Solomon Edwards, Ijeoma Nnodim Opara, Arthur Hampton, Zachary Cichon, Afsana Rinky, Joneigh Khaldun
{"title":"Use of Rapid Qualitative Analysis to Support Collaborative Synergy Within a Community Coalition for Health Equity in Detroit.","authors":"Hayley S Thompson, Ten-Niah Kinney, Carrie Leach, Alexandra Sass, Ariel Washington, Rhonda Dailey, Elizabeth Towner, Alyssa Beavers, Rodlescia Sneed, Karen Solomon Edwards, Ijeoma Nnodim Opara, Arthur Hampton, Zachary Cichon, Afsana Rinky, Joneigh Khaldun","doi":"10.1089/heq.2024.0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A community coalition is an effective strategy for addressing complex health challenges. A citywide coalition of community and academic experts was formed to address Detroit's persistent health disparities. To foster collaborative synergy, we explored hyperlocal perspectives on health equity by applying rapid qualitative analysis (RQA) as a time-efficient and rigorous approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty coalition members completed a key informant interview addressing five key areas: health equity meanings, Detroit's most pressing health problems, social ecological domains that influence health equity and outcomes, and strategies to achieve health equity. We used RQA to interpret interview data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were majority female, Black/African American, and over 60 years old. Participants defined health equity as equal access to opportunities for a healthy life and emphasized the importance of individual choice in pursuing those opportunities. As an indication of their awareness of social determinants of health, participants articulated connections between various social ecological factors and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights participants' recognition of both systemic factors and personal agency in achieving health equity, indicating their nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between social structures and individual health, which is crucial for community-driven multilevel health interventions. Furthermore, by fostering better communication and alignment, RQA is an efficient and effective method to enhance coalition synergy.</p><p><strong>Health equity implications: </strong>By facilitating a shared understanding of health equity and its determinants, RQA can help coalitions ensure inclusion and integration of diverse perspectives in intervention planning and delivery, particularly in urban settings facing similar challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"9 1","pages":"87-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A community coalition is an effective strategy for addressing complex health challenges. A citywide coalition of community and academic experts was formed to address Detroit's persistent health disparities. To foster collaborative synergy, we explored hyperlocal perspectives on health equity by applying rapid qualitative analysis (RQA) as a time-efficient and rigorous approach.

Methods: Twenty coalition members completed a key informant interview addressing five key areas: health equity meanings, Detroit's most pressing health problems, social ecological domains that influence health equity and outcomes, and strategies to achieve health equity. We used RQA to interpret interview data.

Results: Participants were majority female, Black/African American, and over 60 years old. Participants defined health equity as equal access to opportunities for a healthy life and emphasized the importance of individual choice in pursuing those opportunities. As an indication of their awareness of social determinants of health, participants articulated connections between various social ecological factors and health outcomes.

Discussion: This study highlights participants' recognition of both systemic factors and personal agency in achieving health equity, indicating their nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between social structures and individual health, which is crucial for community-driven multilevel health interventions. Furthermore, by fostering better communication and alignment, RQA is an efficient and effective method to enhance coalition synergy.

Health equity implications: By facilitating a shared understanding of health equity and its determinants, RQA can help coalitions ensure inclusion and integration of diverse perspectives in intervention planning and delivery, particularly in urban settings facing similar challenges.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信