Moving Beyond Mandatory Modules: Authentic Discussions About Racism and Health Equity at a Large Academic Medical Center.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2024.0129
Karla Chamorro Garcia, Byron Gonzalez, Julia A Healey, Leah Gordon, Maria Perla Brault, Esteban A Barreto, Carlos G Torres
{"title":"Moving Beyond Mandatory Modules: Authentic Discussions About Racism and Health Equity at a Large Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Karla Chamorro Garcia, Byron Gonzalez, Julia A Healey, Leah Gordon, Maria Perla Brault, Esteban A Barreto, Carlos G Torres","doi":"10.1089/heq.2024.0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our institution launched a large-scale virtual training program called \"Stepping Stones\" that uses allegories to provide an increased understanding of concepts, such as interpersonal, internalized, and structural racism. The goal of this project was to implement facilitated discussions with trained leaders and determine the impact of these sessions in improving the experience of the modules and boosting comfort in discussing race and racism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed facilitated discussions as a complimentary intervention for colleagues who participated in the virtual system-wide intervention. Our intention was to create a safe space to foster reflection and collaborative learning on how racism shows up in our work environment. We conducted 22 sessions across Massachusetts General Hospital between December 2021 and February 2023. Each session included between 5 and 30 participants who were asked to complete a survey regarding their experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected post-session surveys from 102 out of 350 participants. Participants found the sessions to be informative and valuable. Over 97% of respondents rated the quality of the discussions as \"Excellent\" or \"Very Good.\" Similarly, 95% of participants felt \"Very\" or \"Somewhat\" comfortable with discussing issues of race and racism in the workplace after the session.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants reported that the facilitated discussions were valuable, enhanced their ability to talk about racism in clinical environments, and provided an opportunity for reflection. Giving the hospital staff a common language and the ability to discuss such challenging topics may contribute to a culture of equity within our hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"9 1","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our institution launched a large-scale virtual training program called "Stepping Stones" that uses allegories to provide an increased understanding of concepts, such as interpersonal, internalized, and structural racism. The goal of this project was to implement facilitated discussions with trained leaders and determine the impact of these sessions in improving the experience of the modules and boosting comfort in discussing race and racism.

Methods: We developed facilitated discussions as a complimentary intervention for colleagues who participated in the virtual system-wide intervention. Our intention was to create a safe space to foster reflection and collaborative learning on how racism shows up in our work environment. We conducted 22 sessions across Massachusetts General Hospital between December 2021 and February 2023. Each session included between 5 and 30 participants who were asked to complete a survey regarding their experience.

Results: We collected post-session surveys from 102 out of 350 participants. Participants found the sessions to be informative and valuable. Over 97% of respondents rated the quality of the discussions as "Excellent" or "Very Good." Similarly, 95% of participants felt "Very" or "Somewhat" comfortable with discussing issues of race and racism in the workplace after the session.

Discussion: Participants reported that the facilitated discussions were valuable, enhanced their ability to talk about racism in clinical environments, and provided an opportunity for reflection. Giving the hospital staff a common language and the ability to discuss such challenging topics may contribute to a culture of equity within our hospital.

超越强制性模块:在一个大型学术医疗中心关于种族主义和健康公平的真实讨论。
简介:我们的机构推出了一个名为“踏脚石”的大型虚拟培训项目,该项目使用寓言来提高对人际、内化和结构性种族主义等概念的理解。该项目的目标是与训练有素的领导者进行便利的讨论,并确定这些会议在改善模块体验和促进讨论种族和种族主义方面的影响。方法:我们为参与虚拟全系统干预的同事开发了便利的讨论,作为一种免费干预。我们的目的是创造一个安全的空间,促进对种族主义如何在我们的工作环境中出现的反思和协作学习。我们在2021年12月至2023年2月期间在马萨诸塞州总医院进行了22次会议。每次会议包括5到30名参与者,他们被要求完成一份关于他们经历的调查。结果:我们收集了350名参与者中的102名的会后调查。与会者认为会议内容丰富,很有价值。超过97%的受访者将讨论的质量评为“优秀”或“非常好”。同样,95%的参与者在会议结束后对在工作场所讨论种族和种族主义问题感到“非常”或“有些”舒服。讨论:参与者报告说,促进的讨论是有价值的,提高了他们在临床环境中谈论种族主义的能力,并提供了一个反思的机会。给医院员工一种共同的语言和讨论这些具有挑战性的话题的能力可能有助于我们医院的公平文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信