Impact of Strict Isolation Precautions on Families with a Language Other than English.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2024.0117
Polina Frolova Gregory, Sanyukta Desai, Corrie E McDaniel, Austin DeChalus, Emily Bowen, Michael Dinh, Jessica Gagen, Dwight Barry, Abena Knight, Matthew Test, Arti D Desai, Mersine A Bryan
{"title":"Impact of Strict Isolation Precautions on Families with a Language Other than English.","authors":"Polina Frolova Gregory, Sanyukta Desai, Corrie E McDaniel, Austin DeChalus, Emily Bowen, Michael Dinh, Jessica Gagen, Dwight Barry, Abena Knight, Matthew Test, Arti D Desai, Mersine A Bryan","doi":"10.1089/heq.2024.0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Children with a language for care other than English (LOE) are at risk for inequitable care. We examined the association of isolation precautions in the care of hospitalized children with LOE through the frequency of professional interpreter use and timing of in-person consultation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of children in a strict isolation unit (SIU) between 2/2020 and 12/2021. Negative binomial regression was used to assess both differences in interpretation rates between SIU and non-SIU, and within 72-h/in-person consultation rates within the SIU between English-speaking and LOE encounters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 487 encounters in the SIU; 126 (26%) involved patients with LOE. The median interpretations per day were 4.5 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 2.0-6.7). Among patients with LOE, there was an observed difference in median interpretations per day in the SIU (3.9, IQR: 1.7-6.4) versus encounters in non-SIU acute care units (5.0, IQR: 1.2-8.2). However, this difference was not statistically significant (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.13). Sub-specialty consultations were requested for 410 (84%) encounters within the SIU; 282 (69%) were completed in person within 72 h. A small difference between the percentage of completed consultations for encounters with LOE (<i>n</i> = 61, 64%) and English-speaking patients' encounters (<i>n</i> = 221, 70%) was noted, which again was not statistically significant (IRR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.71-1.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the increased barriers of strict isolation, we exceeded institutional standards for interpretations per day and had similar rates of interpretation for encounters with LOE admitted to medical units regardless of isolation status.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"9 1","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Children with a language for care other than English (LOE) are at risk for inequitable care. We examined the association of isolation precautions in the care of hospitalized children with LOE through the frequency of professional interpreter use and timing of in-person consultation.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of children in a strict isolation unit (SIU) between 2/2020 and 12/2021. Negative binomial regression was used to assess both differences in interpretation rates between SIU and non-SIU, and within 72-h/in-person consultation rates within the SIU between English-speaking and LOE encounters.

Results: We identified 487 encounters in the SIU; 126 (26%) involved patients with LOE. The median interpretations per day were 4.5 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 2.0-6.7). Among patients with LOE, there was an observed difference in median interpretations per day in the SIU (3.9, IQR: 1.7-6.4) versus encounters in non-SIU acute care units (5.0, IQR: 1.2-8.2). However, this difference was not statistically significant (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.13). Sub-specialty consultations were requested for 410 (84%) encounters within the SIU; 282 (69%) were completed in person within 72 h. A small difference between the percentage of completed consultations for encounters with LOE (n = 61, 64%) and English-speaking patients' encounters (n = 221, 70%) was noted, which again was not statistically significant (IRR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.71-1.21).

Conclusion: Despite the increased barriers of strict isolation, we exceeded institutional standards for interpretations per day and had similar rates of interpretation for encounters with LOE admitted to medical units regardless of isolation status.

严格隔离措施对非英语家庭的影响
使用非英语护理语言(LOE)的儿童面临不公平护理的风险。我们通过使用专业口译员的频率和面对面咨询的时间来检查住院LOE儿童护理中隔离预防措施的相关性。方法:对2020年2月至2021年12月在严格隔离病房(SIU)住院的儿童进行回顾性队列研究。使用负二项回归来评估SIU和非SIU之间的解释率差异,以及英语和LOE接触之间SIU内72小时/人咨询率的差异。结果:我们在SIU中确定了487次遭遇;126例(26%)为LOE患者。每天解释的中位数为4.5(四分位数间距[IQR]: 2.0-6.7)。在LOE患者中,观察到SIU (3.9, IQR: 1.7-6.4)与非SIU急性护理病房(5.0,IQR: 1.2-8.2)的平均每日解释差异。然而,这种差异没有统计学意义(发病率比[IRR]: 0.89;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.70-1.13)。在SIU内要求进行410次(84%)次专科会诊;282例(69%)患者在72小时内亲自完成。LOE患者的会诊完成百分比(n = 61,64%)与英语患者的会诊完成百分比(n = 221, 70%)之间存在微小差异,但同样无统计学意义(IRR: 0.93;95% ci: 0.71-1.21)。结论:尽管严格隔离的障碍增加了,但我们每天的口译超过了机构标准,并且无论隔离状态如何,医疗单位收治的LOE遭遇的口译率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信