Examining Black Birthing People's Experiences with Racism, Discrimination, and Contextualized Stress and Their Perspectives on Racial Concordance with Prenatal Providers.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0266
E Nicole Teal, Aryana Daye, Sarah C Haight, M Kathryn Menard, Karen Sheffield-Abdullah
{"title":"Examining Black Birthing People's Experiences with Racism, Discrimination, and Contextualized Stress and Their Perspectives on Racial Concordance with Prenatal Providers.","authors":"E Nicole Teal, Aryana Daye, Sarah C Haight, M Kathryn Menard, Karen Sheffield-Abdullah","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We examine Black birthing people's experiences with racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress and whether those experiences are associated with preference for racially concordant prenatal care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study is the quantitative component of a larger, mixed-methods study. Data were from initial (August-October 2021) and follow-up (December 2022-January 2023) surveys among self-identified Black and/or African American birthing people who delivered a baby at a university system between 2019 and 2021 and were at least 18 years old. Respondents were 3-32 months postdelivery at the initial survey, which collected data on demographics and the Perceived Racism (ranges 0-430), Perceived Discrimination (ranges 0-36), and Jackson, Hogue, Phillips Contextualized Stress Measure (ranges 0-355) scales. The follow-up survey assessed views on racial and gender concordance and continuity with prenatal providers. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed relationships between scale scores and agreement that racial concordance is important and preferable. Poisson regression assessed whether a top quartile score on scales was related to importance of and preference for racial concordance with providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 200) scored medians of 99.5 on the racism scale, 33 on the discrimination scale, and 177 on the contextualized stress scale. Of follow-up survey participants (<i>n</i> = 69), 78.3% agreed they would choose a racially concordant prenatal provider if possible (<i>n</i> = 54) and 42.0% agreed that racial concordance with their provider was important (<i>n</i> = 29). Scoring higher on discrimination and contextualized stress scales was positively correlated with agreeing that racial concordance was important. Regression analyses showed no significant associations between scale scores and agreeing that racial concordance with one's prenatal provider is important or preferable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Black birthing people experience high levels of racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress. The overwhelming majority would choose racial concordance with their prenatal provider if possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"588-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We examine Black birthing people's experiences with racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress and whether those experiences are associated with preference for racially concordant prenatal care providers.

Methods: This cross-sectional study is the quantitative component of a larger, mixed-methods study. Data were from initial (August-October 2021) and follow-up (December 2022-January 2023) surveys among self-identified Black and/or African American birthing people who delivered a baby at a university system between 2019 and 2021 and were at least 18 years old. Respondents were 3-32 months postdelivery at the initial survey, which collected data on demographics and the Perceived Racism (ranges 0-430), Perceived Discrimination (ranges 0-36), and Jackson, Hogue, Phillips Contextualized Stress Measure (ranges 0-355) scales. The follow-up survey assessed views on racial and gender concordance and continuity with prenatal providers. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed relationships between scale scores and agreement that racial concordance is important and preferable. Poisson regression assessed whether a top quartile score on scales was related to importance of and preference for racial concordance with providers.

Results: Participants (n = 200) scored medians of 99.5 on the racism scale, 33 on the discrimination scale, and 177 on the contextualized stress scale. Of follow-up survey participants (n = 69), 78.3% agreed they would choose a racially concordant prenatal provider if possible (n = 54) and 42.0% agreed that racial concordance with their provider was important (n = 29). Scoring higher on discrimination and contextualized stress scales was positively correlated with agreeing that racial concordance was important. Regression analyses showed no significant associations between scale scores and agreeing that racial concordance with one's prenatal provider is important or preferable.

Conclusion: Black birthing people experience high levels of racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress. The overwhelming majority would choose racial concordance with their prenatal provider if possible.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信