Examining Black Birthing People's Experiences with Racism, Discrimination, and Contextualized Stress and Their Perspectives on Racial Concordance with Prenatal Providers.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0266
E Nicole Teal, Aryana Daye, Sarah C Haight, M Kathryn Menard, Karen Sheffield-Abdullah
{"title":"Examining Black Birthing People's Experiences with Racism, Discrimination, and Contextualized Stress and Their Perspectives on Racial Concordance with Prenatal Providers.","authors":"E Nicole Teal, Aryana Daye, Sarah C Haight, M Kathryn Menard, Karen Sheffield-Abdullah","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We examine Black birthing people's experiences with racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress and whether those experiences are associated with preference for racially concordant prenatal care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study is the quantitative component of a larger, mixed-methods study. Data were from initial (August-October 2021) and follow-up (December 2022-January 2023) surveys among self-identified Black and/or African American birthing people who delivered a baby at a university system between 2019 and 2021 and were at least 18 years old. Respondents were 3-32 months postdelivery at the initial survey, which collected data on demographics and the Perceived Racism (ranges 0-430), Perceived Discrimination (ranges 0-36), and Jackson, Hogue, Phillips Contextualized Stress Measure (ranges 0-355) scales. The follow-up survey assessed views on racial and gender concordance and continuity with prenatal providers. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed relationships between scale scores and agreement that racial concordance is important and preferable. Poisson regression assessed whether a top quartile score on scales was related to importance of and preference for racial concordance with providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 200) scored medians of 99.5 on the racism scale, 33 on the discrimination scale, and 177 on the contextualized stress scale. Of follow-up survey participants (<i>n</i> = 69), 78.3% agreed they would choose a racially concordant prenatal provider if possible (<i>n</i> = 54) and 42.0% agreed that racial concordance with their provider was important (<i>n</i> = 29). Scoring higher on discrimination and contextualized stress scales was positively correlated with agreeing that racial concordance was important. Regression analyses showed no significant associations between scale scores and agreeing that racial concordance with one's prenatal provider is important or preferable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Black birthing people experience high levels of racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress. The overwhelming majority would choose racial concordance with their prenatal provider if possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"588-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We examine Black birthing people's experiences with racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress and whether those experiences are associated with preference for racially concordant prenatal care providers.

Methods: This cross-sectional study is the quantitative component of a larger, mixed-methods study. Data were from initial (August-October 2021) and follow-up (December 2022-January 2023) surveys among self-identified Black and/or African American birthing people who delivered a baby at a university system between 2019 and 2021 and were at least 18 years old. Respondents were 3-32 months postdelivery at the initial survey, which collected data on demographics and the Perceived Racism (ranges 0-430), Perceived Discrimination (ranges 0-36), and Jackson, Hogue, Phillips Contextualized Stress Measure (ranges 0-355) scales. The follow-up survey assessed views on racial and gender concordance and continuity with prenatal providers. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed relationships between scale scores and agreement that racial concordance is important and preferable. Poisson regression assessed whether a top quartile score on scales was related to importance of and preference for racial concordance with providers.

Results: Participants (n = 200) scored medians of 99.5 on the racism scale, 33 on the discrimination scale, and 177 on the contextualized stress scale. Of follow-up survey participants (n = 69), 78.3% agreed they would choose a racially concordant prenatal provider if possible (n = 54) and 42.0% agreed that racial concordance with their provider was important (n = 29). Scoring higher on discrimination and contextualized stress scales was positively correlated with agreeing that racial concordance was important. Regression analyses showed no significant associations between scale scores and agreeing that racial concordance with one's prenatal provider is important or preferable.

Conclusion: Black birthing people experience high levels of racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress. The overwhelming majority would choose racial concordance with their prenatal provider if possible.

研究黑人生育者的种族主义、歧视和情境化压力的经历及其对产前提供者种族一致性的看法。
前言:我们研究了黑人生育者在种族主义、歧视和情境化压力方面的经历,以及这些经历是否与对种族和谐的产前护理提供者的偏好有关。方法:这项横断面研究是一项更大的混合方法研究的定量组成部分。数据来自最初(2021年8月至10月)和后续(2022年12月至2023年1月)的调查,调查对象是自认为是黑人和/或非裔美国人,这些人在2019年至2021年期间在大学系统分娩,年龄至少为18岁。最初的调查收集了人口统计数据和感知种族主义(范围0-430)、感知歧视(范围0-36)以及杰克逊、霍格、菲利普斯情境化压力测量(范围0-355)的数据。后续调查评估了对种族和性别一致性和产前提供者连续性的看法。皮尔逊相关系数评估量表得分和种族一致性是重要和可取的共识之间的关系。泊松回归评估量表上的前四分之一分数是否与提供者的种族一致性的重要性和偏好有关。结果:200名被试的种族主义量表中位数为99.5分,歧视量表中位数为33分,情境化压力量表中位数为177分。在随访调查参与者(n = 69)中,78.3% (n = 54)同意如果可能的话,他们会选择种族一致的产前提供者,42.0% (n = 29)同意与提供者的种族一致很重要。在歧视和情境压力量表上得分越高,就越认同种族一致性是重要的。回归分析显示,在量表得分和同意与产前提供者的种族一致性是重要的或可取的之间没有显著的关联。结论:黑人生育经历了高水平的种族主义、歧视和情境化压力。如果可能的话,绝大多数人会选择与其产前提供者的种族一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信