Advancing Active Transportation Through Mobility Justice and Centering Community.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2024.0087
Barbara I Baquero, Rachel Berney, Evalynn Fae T Romano, Olivia Hicks, Robert Getch, Crystal Hall, Stephen J Mooney, Dori Rosenberg, K L Shannon, Brian E Saelens, Katherine D Hoerster
{"title":"Advancing Active Transportation Through Mobility Justice and Centering Community.","authors":"Barbara I Baquero, Rachel Berney, Evalynn Fae T Romano, Olivia Hicks, Robert Getch, Crystal Hall, Stephen J Mooney, Dori Rosenberg, K L Shannon, Brian E Saelens, Katherine D Hoerster","doi":"10.1089/heq.2024.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We established a community-academic-policy partnership to examine mobility challenges and opportunities by centering members of a diverse South Seattle neighborhood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three participatory research methods were used: (a) 30- to 60-min qualitative interviews with community leaders (<i>n</i> = 12) and members (<i>n</i> = 16); (b) a photovoice with youth (<i>n</i> = 10); and (c) mobility audits. We also engaged extensively in community dissemination and advocacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged: experiences with the built environment; conflicting views on promoting active transportation; experiences of danger, violence, and racism while moving in the community; and pride and connections within the community. Mobility audit findings reinforced many community member messages about needed infrastructure changes. Participants consistently expressed the need for neighborhood and city-wide structural improvements to support transportation and mobility, including enhanced public transportation; better lighting, crosswalks, sidewalks, pavement, and curb cuts; and maintenance of a neighborhood mixed-use trail. Participants shared the importance of community connection while walking, rolling, or using public transit and wanted to maintain this experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collectively, findings identified ways to increase nonmotorized transportation and public transit access, safety, and resilience, centering solutions on communities of color. We disseminated and amplified community recommendations to advance mobility justice in South Seattle via a community forum, developing a website, holding meetings with local leaders, and writing through print and electronic media. A key, novel strength of our project was the addition of community organizations, community-academic partners, and government leaders from the project's inception. Local leaders should engage in mobility justice-focused community engagement to advance equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"720-730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We established a community-academic-policy partnership to examine mobility challenges and opportunities by centering members of a diverse South Seattle neighborhood.

Methods: Three participatory research methods were used: (a) 30- to 60-min qualitative interviews with community leaders (n = 12) and members (n = 16); (b) a photovoice with youth (n = 10); and (c) mobility audits. We also engaged extensively in community dissemination and advocacy.

Results: Four major themes emerged: experiences with the built environment; conflicting views on promoting active transportation; experiences of danger, violence, and racism while moving in the community; and pride and connections within the community. Mobility audit findings reinforced many community member messages about needed infrastructure changes. Participants consistently expressed the need for neighborhood and city-wide structural improvements to support transportation and mobility, including enhanced public transportation; better lighting, crosswalks, sidewalks, pavement, and curb cuts; and maintenance of a neighborhood mixed-use trail. Participants shared the importance of community connection while walking, rolling, or using public transit and wanted to maintain this experience.

Conclusions: Collectively, findings identified ways to increase nonmotorized transportation and public transit access, safety, and resilience, centering solutions on communities of color. We disseminated and amplified community recommendations to advance mobility justice in South Seattle via a community forum, developing a website, holding meetings with local leaders, and writing through print and electronic media. A key, novel strength of our project was the addition of community organizations, community-academic partners, and government leaders from the project's inception. Local leaders should engage in mobility justice-focused community engagement to advance equity.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信