Advancing Active Transportation Through Mobility Justice and Centering Community.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2024.0087
Barbara I Baquero, Rachel Berney, Evalynn Fae T Romano, Olivia Hicks, Robert Getch, Crystal Hall, Stephen J Mooney, Dori Rosenberg, K L Shannon, Brian E Saelens, Katherine D Hoerster
{"title":"Advancing Active Transportation Through Mobility Justice and Centering Community.","authors":"Barbara I Baquero, Rachel Berney, Evalynn Fae T Romano, Olivia Hicks, Robert Getch, Crystal Hall, Stephen J Mooney, Dori Rosenberg, K L Shannon, Brian E Saelens, Katherine D Hoerster","doi":"10.1089/heq.2024.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We established a community-academic-policy partnership to examine mobility challenges and opportunities by centering members of a diverse South Seattle neighborhood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three participatory research methods were used: (a) 30- to 60-min qualitative interviews with community leaders (<i>n</i> = 12) and members (<i>n</i> = 16); (b) a photovoice with youth (<i>n</i> = 10); and (c) mobility audits. We also engaged extensively in community dissemination and advocacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged: experiences with the built environment; conflicting views on promoting active transportation; experiences of danger, violence, and racism while moving in the community; and pride and connections within the community. Mobility audit findings reinforced many community member messages about needed infrastructure changes. Participants consistently expressed the need for neighborhood and city-wide structural improvements to support transportation and mobility, including enhanced public transportation; better lighting, crosswalks, sidewalks, pavement, and curb cuts; and maintenance of a neighborhood mixed-use trail. Participants shared the importance of community connection while walking, rolling, or using public transit and wanted to maintain this experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collectively, findings identified ways to increase nonmotorized transportation and public transit access, safety, and resilience, centering solutions on communities of color. We disseminated and amplified community recommendations to advance mobility justice in South Seattle via a community forum, developing a website, holding meetings with local leaders, and writing through print and electronic media. A key, novel strength of our project was the addition of community organizations, community-academic partners, and government leaders from the project's inception. Local leaders should engage in mobility justice-focused community engagement to advance equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"720-730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We established a community-academic-policy partnership to examine mobility challenges and opportunities by centering members of a diverse South Seattle neighborhood.

Methods: Three participatory research methods were used: (a) 30- to 60-min qualitative interviews with community leaders (n = 12) and members (n = 16); (b) a photovoice with youth (n = 10); and (c) mobility audits. We also engaged extensively in community dissemination and advocacy.

Results: Four major themes emerged: experiences with the built environment; conflicting views on promoting active transportation; experiences of danger, violence, and racism while moving in the community; and pride and connections within the community. Mobility audit findings reinforced many community member messages about needed infrastructure changes. Participants consistently expressed the need for neighborhood and city-wide structural improvements to support transportation and mobility, including enhanced public transportation; better lighting, crosswalks, sidewalks, pavement, and curb cuts; and maintenance of a neighborhood mixed-use trail. Participants shared the importance of community connection while walking, rolling, or using public transit and wanted to maintain this experience.

Conclusions: Collectively, findings identified ways to increase nonmotorized transportation and public transit access, safety, and resilience, centering solutions on communities of color. We disseminated and amplified community recommendations to advance mobility justice in South Seattle via a community forum, developing a website, holding meetings with local leaders, and writing through print and electronic media. A key, novel strength of our project was the addition of community organizations, community-academic partners, and government leaders from the project's inception. Local leaders should engage in mobility justice-focused community engagement to advance equity.

通过交通公正和以社区为中心推进主动交通。
目标:我们建立了一个社区学术政策合作伙伴关系,以多元化的南西雅图社区成员为中心,研究流动性的挑战和机遇。方法:采用三种参与式研究方法:(a)对社区领导人(n = 12)和社区成员(n = 16)进行30- 60分钟的定性访谈;(b)年轻的照片语音(n = 10);(c)流动性审计。我们还广泛从事社区宣传和宣传工作。结果:出现了四个主要主题:与建筑环境的体验;关于促进主动交通的不同观点;在社区活动中经历危险、暴力和种族主义;以及自豪感和社区内的联系。移动审计的发现强化了许多社区成员关于基础设施需要改变的信息。与会者一致表示需要改善社区和全市的结构,以支持交通和流动性,包括加强公共交通;改善照明、人行横道、人行道、人行道和路缘切割;维护社区的混合用途步道。参与者在步行、滚动或使用公共交通时分享了社区联系的重要性,并希望保持这种体验。结论:总的来说,研究结果确定了增加非机动交通和公共交通的途径,安全性和弹性,以有色人种社区为中心的解决方案。我们通过社区论坛、开发网站、与当地领导人举行会议,以及通过印刷和电子媒体撰写文章,传播和扩大社区建议,以促进南西雅图的流动正义。我们项目的一个关键的、新颖的优势是从项目开始就加入了社区组织、社区学术合作伙伴和政府领导人。地方领导人应参与以流动性正义为重点的社区参与,以促进公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信