Tumor Budding: A Novel Prognostic Marker in Breast Carcinoma with Correlation of Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Parameters.

IF 0.8 Q4 ONCOLOGY
South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1789582
Poornima Manimaran, Ashini Shah, Amisha Gami, Jahnavi Gandhi, Sneha Kakoty, Varnika Rai, Priti P Trivedi
{"title":"Tumor Budding: A Novel Prognostic Marker in Breast Carcinoma with Correlation of Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Parameters.","authors":"Poornima Manimaran, Ashini Shah, Amisha Gami, Jahnavi Gandhi, Sneha Kakoty, Varnika Rai, Priti P Trivedi","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1789582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer is a highly heterogenous tumor with different subtypes showing varying prognosis. Tumor budding is an unfavorable histological feature of many epithelial cancers. The purpose of this study is to analyze the association between tumor bud density with various histological and immunohistochemical characteristics and to explore its prognostic role in breast carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 100 patients of breast cancer diagnosed in our institute from January to December 2017. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides from tumors and immunohistochemical slides were reviewed independently by two pathologists, and clinical data were acquired from computerized records. Patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 100 patients of invasive breast carcinoma. The median age was 52 years, and 96% were invasive ductal carcinoma. The median follow-up was 34 months. High tumor bud density was substantially correlated with primary tumor staging (T3, T4; 73% [11/15] cases) and lymph node staging (N2, N3; 68% [13/19] cases) with <i>p</i> -values of 0.017 and 0.023, respectively. Systemic metastasis (85% [6/7] cases) was significantly associated with high tumor bud density ( <i>p</i> =0.025) but lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) were not significantly associated with tumor bud density ( <i>p</i>  = 0.762 and 0.862, respectively). Patients with N2 nodal stage had low event-free survival rate than N0/N1 nodal stage irrespective of tumor bud status. Grade 3 tumors with high tumor bud density had worse event-free survival than any other grades. There was no association of tumor bud density with tumor staging, necrosis, PNI, LVI, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and <i>Her2/neu</i> , and event-free survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strong relationships have been found between tumor bud density and poor prognostic variables such as primary tumor staging and lymph node staging. These results provide credence to the idea that tumor bud density can be an assessable prognostic feature that should be taken into account while reporting breast cancer cases. Tumor bud density evaluation has to be standardized nevertheless if it is to be widely adopted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"14 1","pages":"38-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1789582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is a highly heterogenous tumor with different subtypes showing varying prognosis. Tumor budding is an unfavorable histological feature of many epithelial cancers. The purpose of this study is to analyze the association between tumor bud density with various histological and immunohistochemical characteristics and to explore its prognostic role in breast carcinoma.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 100 patients of breast cancer diagnosed in our institute from January to December 2017. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides from tumors and immunohistochemical slides were reviewed independently by two pathologists, and clinical data were acquired from computerized records. Patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from the study.

Results: The study comprised 100 patients of invasive breast carcinoma. The median age was 52 years, and 96% were invasive ductal carcinoma. The median follow-up was 34 months. High tumor bud density was substantially correlated with primary tumor staging (T3, T4; 73% [11/15] cases) and lymph node staging (N2, N3; 68% [13/19] cases) with p -values of 0.017 and 0.023, respectively. Systemic metastasis (85% [6/7] cases) was significantly associated with high tumor bud density ( p =0.025) but lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) were not significantly associated with tumor bud density ( p  = 0.762 and 0.862, respectively). Patients with N2 nodal stage had low event-free survival rate than N0/N1 nodal stage irrespective of tumor bud status. Grade 3 tumors with high tumor bud density had worse event-free survival than any other grades. There was no association of tumor bud density with tumor staging, necrosis, PNI, LVI, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Her2/neu , and event-free survival.

Conclusion: Strong relationships have been found between tumor bud density and poor prognostic variables such as primary tumor staging and lymph node staging. These results provide credence to the idea that tumor bud density can be an assessable prognostic feature that should be taken into account while reporting breast cancer cases. Tumor bud density evaluation has to be standardized nevertheless if it is to be widely adopted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肿瘤出芽:与组织病理学和免疫组织化学参数相关的乳腺癌新的预后标志物。
乳腺癌是一种高度异质性的肿瘤,具有不同的亚型,预后各异。肿瘤出芽是许多上皮性癌症的不利组织学特征。本研究的目的是分析肿瘤芽密度与各种组织学和免疫组织化学特征的关系,并探讨其在乳腺癌中的预后作用。材料与方法:对我院2017年1 - 12月确诊的100例乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析。肿瘤的苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色切片和免疫组织化学切片由两位病理学家独立审查,临床数据来自计算机记录。接受新辅助化疗的患者被排除在研究之外。结果:本研究纳入100例浸润性乳腺癌患者。中位年龄52岁,96%为浸润性导管癌。中位随访时间为34个月。高肿瘤芽密度与原发肿瘤分期显著相关(T3, T4;73%[11/15]例)和淋巴结分期(N2, N3;68%[13/19]例),p值分别为0.017和0.023。系统性转移(85%[6/7])与高肿瘤芽密度显著相关(p =0.025),而淋巴血管浸润(LVI)和神经周围浸润(PNI)与肿瘤芽密度无显著相关性(p = 0.762和0.862)。无论肿瘤芽态如何,N2淋巴结期患者的无事件生存率均低于N0/N1淋巴结期患者。具有高肿瘤芽密度的3级肿瘤的无事件生存率比其他任何级别的肿瘤都差。肿瘤芽密度与肿瘤分期、坏死、PNI、LVI、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、Her2/neu和无事件生存无相关性。结论:肿瘤芽密度与原发性肿瘤分期、淋巴结分期等不良预后指标有密切关系。这些结果为肿瘤芽密度是一种可评估的预后特征提供了依据,在报告乳腺癌病例时应将其考虑在内。然而,肿瘤芽密度评价若要被广泛采用,则必须标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信