Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Nivolumab in Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Audit from Resource-Constrained Settings.

IF 0.8 Q4 ONCOLOGY
South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788649
Amit Kumar, Akhil Kapoor, Vanita Noronha, Vijay M Patil, Amit Joshi, Nandini Menon, Amit Janu, Abhishek Mahajan, Akhil Rajendra, Amit Agarawal, Satvik Khaddar, Anu Rajpurohit, Lakhan Kashyap, Anne Srikant, Gautam Panda, Kishore Kumar Kota, Vikas Talreja, Kumar Prabhash
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Nivolumab in Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Audit from Resource-Constrained Settings.","authors":"Amit Kumar, Akhil Kapoor, Vanita Noronha, Vijay M Patil, Amit Joshi, Nandini Menon, Amit Janu, Abhishek Mahajan, Akhil Rajendra, Amit Agarawal, Satvik Khaddar, Anu Rajpurohit, Lakhan Kashyap, Anne Srikant, Gautam Panda, Kishore Kumar Kota, Vikas Talreja, Kumar Prabhash","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy has improved outcomes in many advanced solid tumors. In resource-constrained settings, less than 2% of patients can afford standard dose immunotherapy. A recent phase II study showed the efficacy of low-dose immunotherapy in this setting. We used low-dose immunotherapy on a compassionate basis in patients who had progressed on available standard treatment options and standard dose immunotherapy was not feasible.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from the medical oncology department for consecutive patients who had initially received standard lines of therapy followed by low-dose immunotherapy (nivolumab 40 mg) on a compassionate basis. The demographic details, histology, prior treatment, clinical and radiological response, date of disease progression, date of death, and toxicity data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 consecutive patients, who received low-dose immunotherapy with nivolumab from January 1, 2018 to February 14, 2020, were included in this analysis; 4 patients were not radiologically evaluable. The median age was 50.4 years (range 35-74 years), male:female ratio was 6:1. The most common comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes seen in 12 (22.2%) and 6 (11.1%) patients, respectively. The majority of the patients (70.4%) were of head and neck cancer. The median follow-up was 4.5 months (range 0.5-11.7). Clinical benefit was observed in 18 (33.3%) patients. Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 9 (16.7%) and 5 (9.3%) patients, respectively. Median survival was not reached for these patients. Six months progression-free survival and overall survival were 100 versus 8.7% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.36; <i>p</i>  = 0.003) and 100 versus 29.7% (HR 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.95; <i>p</i>  = 0.047), respectively, for responders and nonresponders. The side effects were manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In resource-constrained settings, low-dose immunotherapy with nivolumab seems to be an effective treatment option. Further studies are warranted to evaluate this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"14 1","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy has improved outcomes in many advanced solid tumors. In resource-constrained settings, less than 2% of patients can afford standard dose immunotherapy. A recent phase II study showed the efficacy of low-dose immunotherapy in this setting. We used low-dose immunotherapy on a compassionate basis in patients who had progressed on available standard treatment options and standard dose immunotherapy was not feasible.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively collected data from the medical oncology department for consecutive patients who had initially received standard lines of therapy followed by low-dose immunotherapy (nivolumab 40 mg) on a compassionate basis. The demographic details, histology, prior treatment, clinical and radiological response, date of disease progression, date of death, and toxicity data were collected.

Results: A total of 54 consecutive patients, who received low-dose immunotherapy with nivolumab from January 1, 2018 to February 14, 2020, were included in this analysis; 4 patients were not radiologically evaluable. The median age was 50.4 years (range 35-74 years), male:female ratio was 6:1. The most common comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes seen in 12 (22.2%) and 6 (11.1%) patients, respectively. The majority of the patients (70.4%) were of head and neck cancer. The median follow-up was 4.5 months (range 0.5-11.7). Clinical benefit was observed in 18 (33.3%) patients. Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 9 (16.7%) and 5 (9.3%) patients, respectively. Median survival was not reached for these patients. Six months progression-free survival and overall survival were 100 versus 8.7% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.36; p  = 0.003) and 100 versus 29.7% (HR 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.95; p  = 0.047), respectively, for responders and nonresponders. The side effects were manageable.

Conclusion: In resource-constrained settings, low-dose immunotherapy with nivolumab seems to be an effective treatment option. Further studies are warranted to evaluate this approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低剂量纳武单抗治疗晚期实体瘤的有效性和安全性:来自资源受限环境的回顾性审计
背景:免疫治疗改善了许多晚期实体瘤的预后。在资源有限的情况下,只有不到2%的患者能够负担得起标准剂量的免疫治疗。最近的一项II期研究显示了低剂量免疫治疗在这种情况下的疗效。我们在同情的基础上使用了低剂量免疫治疗,这些患者在现有的标准治疗方案中取得了进展,而标准剂量免疫治疗是不可行的。患者和方法:我们回顾性地收集肿瘤内科连续患者的数据,这些患者最初接受标准治疗,然后在同情的基础上接受低剂量免疫治疗(nivolumab 40 mg)。收集了人口统计学细节、组织学、既往治疗、临床和放射学反应、疾病进展日期、死亡日期和毒性数据。结果:2018年1月1日至2020年2月14日,共有54名连续接受纳武单抗低剂量免疫治疗的患者被纳入该分析;4例患者放射学无法评价。年龄中位数为50.4岁(35 ~ 74岁),男女比例为6:1。最常见的合并症是高血压和糖尿病,分别有12例(22.2%)和6例(11.1%)。以头颈癌为主(70.4%)。中位随访时间为4.5个月(0.5-11.7个月)。18例(33.3%)患者临床获益。9例(16.7%)患者部分缓解,5例(9.3%)患者病情稳定。这些患者的中位生存期未达到。6个月无进展生存期和总生存期分别为100和8.7%(风险比[HR] 0.05, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.01-0.36;p = 0.003)和100比29.7% (HR 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.95;P = 0.047)。副作用是可控的。结论:在资源受限的情况下,低剂量免疫治疗纳武单抗似乎是一种有效的治疗选择。需要进一步的研究来评估这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信