Diagnostic performance of high-resolution micro-ultrasound and conventional ultrasound in fusion biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ghazal Khajir, Lindsey T Webb, Soum D Lokeshwar, Gabriela M Diaz, Taira Anderson, Ankur U Choksi, Julian Zhao, Michael S Leapman, Preston C Sprenkle, Joseph F Renzulli
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of high-resolution micro-ultrasound and conventional ultrasound in fusion biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection.","authors":"Ghazal Khajir, Lindsey T Webb, Soum D Lokeshwar, Gabriela M Diaz, Taira Anderson, Ankur U Choksi, Julian Zhao, Michael S Leapman, Preston C Sprenkle, Joseph F Renzulli","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic outcomes of MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using either microUS technology or conventional ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified a matched sample of 899 patients who underwent biopsy at a single institution between January 2017 and January 2023. A paired group of 470 patients was included. The proportion of cancers detected (any cancer and grade group (GG) ≥ 2) was compared between MRI-microUS and MRI-conventional US fusion biopsy groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence of GG ≥ 2 cancer was similar between MRI-microUS and MRI-conventional US fusion biopsy groups (53.6% vs. 55.3%, P > 0.05). In patients undergoing MRI-microUS fusion biopsy, detection of any cancer in SB was greater than TB (69.2% vs. 57.1%, P < 0.001), while GG ≥ 2 detection was similar between SB and TB (44.9% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.06). Moreover, detection of any cancer and GG ≥ 2 using TB were lower in the MRI-microUS fusion biopsy group. On multivariable analysis, age, race, biopsy status, PSA density, and PI-RADS score were significantly associated with detection of GG ≥ 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MicroUS-guided biopsy and conventional US-guided biopsy had similar rates of overall csPCa detection. Targeted biopsy using MRI-microUS fusion yielded lower overall and csPCa detection compared with MRI-conventional US fusion biopsy. MicroUS fusion biopsy is a reasonable alternative to conventional biopsy to detect csPCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic outcomes of MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using either microUS technology or conventional ultrasound.

Methods: We identified a matched sample of 899 patients who underwent biopsy at a single institution between January 2017 and January 2023. A paired group of 470 patients was included. The proportion of cancers detected (any cancer and grade group (GG) ≥ 2) was compared between MRI-microUS and MRI-conventional US fusion biopsy groups.

Results: The overall incidence of GG ≥ 2 cancer was similar between MRI-microUS and MRI-conventional US fusion biopsy groups (53.6% vs. 55.3%, P > 0.05). In patients undergoing MRI-microUS fusion biopsy, detection of any cancer in SB was greater than TB (69.2% vs. 57.1%, P < 0.001), while GG ≥ 2 detection was similar between SB and TB (44.9% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.06). Moreover, detection of any cancer and GG ≥ 2 using TB were lower in the MRI-microUS fusion biopsy group. On multivariable analysis, age, race, biopsy status, PSA density, and PI-RADS score were significantly associated with detection of GG ≥ 2.

Conclusion: MicroUS-guided biopsy and conventional US-guided biopsy had similar rates of overall csPCa detection. Targeted biopsy using MRI-microUS fusion yielded lower overall and csPCa detection compared with MRI-conventional US fusion biopsy. MicroUS fusion biopsy is a reasonable alternative to conventional biopsy to detect csPCa.

背景:本研究旨在评估核磁共振-超声融合靶向活检的诊断结果,以检测使用 microUS 技术或传统超声技术的具有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa):我们确定了2017年1月至2023年1月期间在一家机构接受活检的899名患者的配对样本。470名患者被纳入配对组。比较了核磁共振-微 US 和核磁共振-常规 US 融合活检组检测出的癌症比例(任何癌症和等级组(GG)≥ 2):结果:MRI-microUS和MRI-conventional US融合活检组GG≥2癌症的总发生率相似(53.6% vs. 55.3%,P > 0.05)。在接受MRI-microUS融合活检的患者中,SB组的任何癌症检出率高于TB组(69.2% vs. 57.1%,P < 0.001),而SB组和TB组的GG≥2检出率相似(44.9% vs. 40.5%,P = 0.06)。此外,MRI-MicroUS融合活检组的癌症检出率和GG≥2的检出率均低于TB组。多变量分析显示,年龄、种族、活检状态、PSA密度和PI-RADS评分与GG≥2的检出率显著相关:结论:显微US引导活检和传统US引导活检的总体csPCa检出率相似。与磁共振成像-传统 US 融合活检相比,使用磁共振成像-MicroUS 融合活检进行靶向活检的总检出率和 csPCa 检出率较低。在检测 csPCa 方面,MicroUS 融合活检是传统活检的合理替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信