Improving Bystander Response: How Long Does It Take to Retrieve an AED From Varying Distances.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Erin R Gramm, Jorge A Gumucio, Kate Flickinger, David D Salcido, James J Menegazzi
{"title":"Improving Bystander Response: How Long Does It Take to Retrieve an AED From Varying Distances.","authors":"Erin R Gramm, Jorge A Gumucio, Kate Flickinger, David D Salcido, James J Menegazzi","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2475323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is low, with less than 10% surviving to hospital discharge. Early defibrillation can improve survival from an OHCA with a shockable rhythm. Cell phone applications alert rescuers as to where victims are and where automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are located, but guidance on choosing between going to the victim and doing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and retrieving an AED is lacking. We sought to determine the time required to retrieve AEDs at varying distances in a real-life setting. At a distance greater than 400 meters away, that AED retrieval time will be longer than median emergency medical services (EMS) first response time of 6.9 min, based on national data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty study participants (15 male, 15 female) performed four AED retrieval runs, separated by at least 24 h. Three runs simulated a real-life OHCA situation outdoors on a busy street in our city (in all four seasons), and one was unimpeded on an indoor track. The AED retrieval distances were 200 meters (400 roundtrip), 400 meters (800 roundtrip), and 600 meters (1,200 roundtrip) The middle distance (400/800 meters) was chosen for the track run.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean run times were 4.05 min for the 200/400 m retrieval, 6.62 min for the 400/800 m, 8.62 min for the 600/1,200 m, and 4.35 min for the 400/800 m track run, which is 2.3 min shorter than the 400/800 m real-life run and significantly different (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to mobility, like traffic lights, motor vehicles, weather conditions, and pedestrians, have significant impacts on how long it takes for an AED to be retrieved and returned to the patient's side. Using these simulation runs, we demonstrated that short AED retrieval distances are likely necessary to impact survival. When compared to our national EMS first response times, only the 200/400 m retrieval distance would likely provide sufficient time for a responder to retrieve, arrive at the patient's side and utilize an AED prior to EMS arrival.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2475323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is low, with less than 10% surviving to hospital discharge. Early defibrillation can improve survival from an OHCA with a shockable rhythm. Cell phone applications alert rescuers as to where victims are and where automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are located, but guidance on choosing between going to the victim and doing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and retrieving an AED is lacking. We sought to determine the time required to retrieve AEDs at varying distances in a real-life setting. At a distance greater than 400 meters away, that AED retrieval time will be longer than median emergency medical services (EMS) first response time of 6.9 min, based on national data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry.

Methods: Thirty study participants (15 male, 15 female) performed four AED retrieval runs, separated by at least 24 h. Three runs simulated a real-life OHCA situation outdoors on a busy street in our city (in all four seasons), and one was unimpeded on an indoor track. The AED retrieval distances were 200 meters (400 roundtrip), 400 meters (800 roundtrip), and 600 meters (1,200 roundtrip) The middle distance (400/800 meters) was chosen for the track run.

Results: The mean run times were 4.05 min for the 200/400 m retrieval, 6.62 min for the 400/800 m, 8.62 min for the 600/1,200 m, and 4.35 min for the 400/800 m track run, which is 2.3 min shorter than the 400/800 m real-life run and significantly different (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Barriers to mobility, like traffic lights, motor vehicles, weather conditions, and pedestrians, have significant impacts on how long it takes for an AED to be retrieved and returned to the patient's side. Using these simulation runs, we demonstrated that short AED retrieval distances are likely necessary to impact survival. When compared to our national EMS first response times, only the 200/400 m retrieval distance would likely provide sufficient time for a responder to retrieve, arrive at the patient's side and utilize an AED prior to EMS arrival.

提高旁观者反应:从不同距离取回AED需要多长时间?
目的:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的生存率较低,存活至出院的不到10%。早期除颤可提高伴有震荡性心律的OHCA患者的生存率。手机应用程序可以提醒救援人员受害者的位置以及自动体外除颤器(AED)的位置,但对于在前往受害者身边、进行心肺复苏和取出AED之间做出选择,却缺乏指导。我们试图确定在现实环境中,在不同距离取回aed所需的时间。根据心脏骤停登记处提高生存(CARES)登记处的全国数据,在距离超过400米的地方,AED检索时间将长于紧急医疗服务(EMS)第一反应时间的中位数6.9分钟。方法:30名研究参与者(15名男性,15名女性)进行了4次AED检索,间隔至少24小时。在我们城市的一条繁忙的街道上,有三次跑步模拟了现实生活中的户外OHCA情况(四季都有),还有一次在室内跑道上畅通无阻。AED检索距离分别为200米(往返400次)、400米(往返800次)和600米(往返1200次),跑道跑取距离选择中间距离(400/800米)。结果:200/400米检索用时4.05分钟,400/800米检索用时6.62分钟,600/ 1200米检索用时8.62分钟,400/800米径赛用时4.35分钟,比实际400/800米跑步用时短2.3分钟,差异显著(p)。交通信号灯、机动车辆、天气状况和行人等活动障碍对取回AED并将其送回患者身边所需的时间有重大影响。通过这些模拟运行,我们证明了较短的AED检索距离可能会影响生存。与我们国家的急救第一反应时间相比,只有200/400米的抢救距离可能为急救人员提供足够的时间抢救,到达患者身边,并在急救人员到达之前使用AED。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信