Pathway for the Differential Diagnosis of Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kyoko Okuno, Hidehiko Kawabata, Daisuke Tamura, Chikahisa Higuchi
{"title":"Pathway for the Differential Diagnosis of Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy.","authors":"Kyoko Okuno, Hidehiko Kawabata, Daisuke Tamura, Chikahisa Higuchi","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a common birth injury, generally presenting as upper limb paralysis at birth. While diagnosis is straightforward when associated with known risk factors, misdiagnoses can nevertheless occur. This study aimed to elucidate the process of differential diagnosis for OBPP by analyzing cases of suspected OBPP, ultimately diagnosed with other conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients under 1 year of age presenting with suspected or previously diagnosed OBPP at 2 tertiary childrens' centers in Osaka between 1994 and 2021. Cases were divided into the OBPP and non-OBPP groups, according to the final diagnosis, for comparison of demographic data and physical findings, to determine the clinical course that could be used to differentiate non-OBPP from OBPP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 414 enrolled cases, 387 (93%) were confirmed as OBPP, while 27 (7%) were diagnosed with other conditions. Statistically significant differences were found in gestational age, birth weight, and age of first visit, between the 2 groups, although these were not clinically meaningful for differential diagnosis. Shoulder dystocia was observed in 54% of OBPP cases, but not in non-OBPP cases. The key characteristics of OBPP included paralysis from birth, paralysis following an anatomic distribution, and paralysis that gradually improved without worsening. Conversely, joint contracture immediately after birth was a key indicator for ruling out OBPP. Using these criteria, 24 of 27 suspected cases were excluded from OBPP diagnosis. Of the remaining 3 cases, spinal cord infarction was detected on MRI in 1 case. In the remaining 2 cases, although normal MRI and surgical findings could rule out OBPP, a definite diagnosis could not be made.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that accurate OBPP diagnosis requires careful verification of specific characteristics. If these characteristics are not met, OBPP becomes less likely, and diagnostic uncertainty persists. An MRI of the brachial plexus is needed in such cases.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a common birth injury, generally presenting as upper limb paralysis at birth. While diagnosis is straightforward when associated with known risk factors, misdiagnoses can nevertheless occur. This study aimed to elucidate the process of differential diagnosis for OBPP by analyzing cases of suspected OBPP, ultimately diagnosed with other conditions.

Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients under 1 year of age presenting with suspected or previously diagnosed OBPP at 2 tertiary childrens' centers in Osaka between 1994 and 2021. Cases were divided into the OBPP and non-OBPP groups, according to the final diagnosis, for comparison of demographic data and physical findings, to determine the clinical course that could be used to differentiate non-OBPP from OBPP.

Results: Of the 414 enrolled cases, 387 (93%) were confirmed as OBPP, while 27 (7%) were diagnosed with other conditions. Statistically significant differences were found in gestational age, birth weight, and age of first visit, between the 2 groups, although these were not clinically meaningful for differential diagnosis. Shoulder dystocia was observed in 54% of OBPP cases, but not in non-OBPP cases. The key characteristics of OBPP included paralysis from birth, paralysis following an anatomic distribution, and paralysis that gradually improved without worsening. Conversely, joint contracture immediately after birth was a key indicator for ruling out OBPP. Using these criteria, 24 of 27 suspected cases were excluded from OBPP diagnosis. Of the remaining 3 cases, spinal cord infarction was detected on MRI in 1 case. In the remaining 2 cases, although normal MRI and surgical findings could rule out OBPP, a definite diagnosis could not be made.

Conclusions: This study highlights that accurate OBPP diagnosis requires careful verification of specific characteristics. If these characteristics are not met, OBPP becomes less likely, and diagnostic uncertainty persists. An MRI of the brachial plexus is needed in such cases.

Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

产科臂丛神经麻痹的鉴别诊断途径。
背景:产科臂丛神经麻痹(OBPP)是一种常见的出生损伤,一般表现为出生时上肢瘫痪。虽然与已知的危险因素相关联的诊断是直截了当的,但仍然可能发生误诊。本研究旨在通过分析疑似OBPP并最终诊断为其他疾病的病例,阐明OBPP的鉴别诊断过程。方法:我们回顾了1994年至2021年间在大阪两所三级儿童中心出现的1岁以下疑似或先前诊断为OBPP的患者的电子病历。根据最终诊断,将病例分为OBPP组和非OBPP组,比较人口学资料和体格检查结果,确定临床病程,用于区分非OBPP和OBPP。结果:414例入组病例中,387例(93%)确诊为OBPP, 27例(7%)诊断为其他疾病。两组之间的胎龄、出生体重和首次就诊年龄均有统计学差异,但这些差异对鉴别诊断没有临床意义。54%的OBPP患者出现肩难产,而非OBPP患者无此现象。OBPP的主要特征包括出生时瘫痪、解剖分布后的瘫痪和逐渐改善而不恶化的瘫痪。相反,出生后立即关节挛缩是排除OBPP的关键指标。根据这些标准,27例疑似病例中有24例被排除在OBPP诊断之外。其余3例中,MRI检出脊髓梗死1例。其余2例,虽然正常的MRI和手术表现可以排除OBPP,但不能做出明确的诊断。结论:本研究强调准确的OBPP诊断需要仔细验证具体特征。如果不满足这些特征,OBPP的可能性就会降低,诊断的不确定性就会持续存在。在这种情况下,需要对臂丛进行MRI检查。证据等级:iii级回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信