Pathway for the Differential Diagnosis of Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kyoko Okuno, Hidehiko Kawabata, Daisuke Tamura, Chikahisa Higuchi
{"title":"Pathway for the Differential Diagnosis of Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy.","authors":"Kyoko Okuno, Hidehiko Kawabata, Daisuke Tamura, Chikahisa Higuchi","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a common birth injury, generally presenting as upper limb paralysis at birth. While diagnosis is straightforward when associated with known risk factors, misdiagnoses can nevertheless occur. This study aimed to elucidate the process of differential diagnosis for OBPP by analyzing cases of suspected OBPP, ultimately diagnosed with other conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients under 1 year of age presenting with suspected or previously diagnosed OBPP at 2 tertiary childrens' centers in Osaka between 1994 and 2021. Cases were divided into the OBPP and non-OBPP groups, according to the final diagnosis, for comparison of demographic data and physical findings, to determine the clinical course that could be used to differentiate non-OBPP from OBPP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 414 enrolled cases, 387 (93%) were confirmed as OBPP, while 27 (7%) were diagnosed with other conditions. Statistically significant differences were found in gestational age, birth weight, and age of first visit, between the 2 groups, although these were not clinically meaningful for differential diagnosis. Shoulder dystocia was observed in 54% of OBPP cases, but not in non-OBPP cases. The key characteristics of OBPP included paralysis from birth, paralysis following an anatomic distribution, and paralysis that gradually improved without worsening. Conversely, joint contracture immediately after birth was a key indicator for ruling out OBPP. Using these criteria, 24 of 27 suspected cases were excluded from OBPP diagnosis. Of the remaining 3 cases, spinal cord infarction was detected on MRI in 1 case. In the remaining 2 cases, although normal MRI and surgical findings could rule out OBPP, a definite diagnosis could not be made.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that accurate OBPP diagnosis requires careful verification of specific characteristics. If these characteristics are not met, OBPP becomes less likely, and diagnostic uncertainty persists. An MRI of the brachial plexus is needed in such cases.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a common birth injury, generally presenting as upper limb paralysis at birth. While diagnosis is straightforward when associated with known risk factors, misdiagnoses can nevertheless occur. This study aimed to elucidate the process of differential diagnosis for OBPP by analyzing cases of suspected OBPP, ultimately diagnosed with other conditions.

Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients under 1 year of age presenting with suspected or previously diagnosed OBPP at 2 tertiary childrens' centers in Osaka between 1994 and 2021. Cases were divided into the OBPP and non-OBPP groups, according to the final diagnosis, for comparison of demographic data and physical findings, to determine the clinical course that could be used to differentiate non-OBPP from OBPP.

Results: Of the 414 enrolled cases, 387 (93%) were confirmed as OBPP, while 27 (7%) were diagnosed with other conditions. Statistically significant differences were found in gestational age, birth weight, and age of first visit, between the 2 groups, although these were not clinically meaningful for differential diagnosis. Shoulder dystocia was observed in 54% of OBPP cases, but not in non-OBPP cases. The key characteristics of OBPP included paralysis from birth, paralysis following an anatomic distribution, and paralysis that gradually improved without worsening. Conversely, joint contracture immediately after birth was a key indicator for ruling out OBPP. Using these criteria, 24 of 27 suspected cases were excluded from OBPP diagnosis. Of the remaining 3 cases, spinal cord infarction was detected on MRI in 1 case. In the remaining 2 cases, although normal MRI and surgical findings could rule out OBPP, a definite diagnosis could not be made.

Conclusions: This study highlights that accurate OBPP diagnosis requires careful verification of specific characteristics. If these characteristics are not met, OBPP becomes less likely, and diagnostic uncertainty persists. An MRI of the brachial plexus is needed in such cases.

Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信