Efficacy of high- versus moderate-intensity spatially distributed sequential stimulation in subjects with spinal cord injury: an isometric study.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ehsan Jafari, Petar Kajganic, Vance Bergeron, Julie Di Marco, Amine Metani, Lana Popovic-Maneski
{"title":"Efficacy of high- versus moderate-intensity spatially distributed sequential stimulation in subjects with spinal cord injury: an isometric study.","authors":"Ehsan Jafari, Petar Kajganic, Vance Bergeron, Julie Di Marco, Amine Metani, Lana Popovic-Maneski","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01567-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For producing isometric contractions, spatially distributed sequential stimulation (SDSS) has been demonstrated to be superior to conventional single electrode stimulation (SES) in terms of fatigue reduction and the power output produced by the muscle. However, the impact of stimulation parameters, particularly stimulation intensity, on the effectiveness of SDSS is not sufficiently understood. The aim of this work is to compare the fatigue-reducing capabilities of SDSS at two significantly different electrical stimulation intensities in individuals with lower-limb motor-complete spinal cord injuries, in order to understand the impact of stimulation intensity on the effectiveness of SDSS. Two experiments were conducted, focusing on isometric contractions of the quadriceps muscle group (Experiment 1) and the vastus lateralis muscle (Experiment 2). The effectiveness of high-intensity SDSS was compared to that of moderate-intensity SDSS, with SES serving as a reference. Seven subjects with spinal cord injuries participated in the study. Fatigue and force metrics, including time to fatigue (TTF) and force-time integral (FTI), were analyzed for both electrical stimulation intensity levels. Statistical analysis indicated that the advantages of SDSS over SES in reducing muscle fatigue and enhancing force generation were significantly diminished at high intensity compared to moderate intensity. These findings provide valuable scientific insights into the practical applications of SDSS and contribute to a deeper understanding of its mechanisms in mitigating muscle fatigue. Further research is recommended to explore the effects of various stimulation parameters to optimize SDSS for different muscle groups and functional tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01567-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For producing isometric contractions, spatially distributed sequential stimulation (SDSS) has been demonstrated to be superior to conventional single electrode stimulation (SES) in terms of fatigue reduction and the power output produced by the muscle. However, the impact of stimulation parameters, particularly stimulation intensity, on the effectiveness of SDSS is not sufficiently understood. The aim of this work is to compare the fatigue-reducing capabilities of SDSS at two significantly different electrical stimulation intensities in individuals with lower-limb motor-complete spinal cord injuries, in order to understand the impact of stimulation intensity on the effectiveness of SDSS. Two experiments were conducted, focusing on isometric contractions of the quadriceps muscle group (Experiment 1) and the vastus lateralis muscle (Experiment 2). The effectiveness of high-intensity SDSS was compared to that of moderate-intensity SDSS, with SES serving as a reference. Seven subjects with spinal cord injuries participated in the study. Fatigue and force metrics, including time to fatigue (TTF) and force-time integral (FTI), were analyzed for both electrical stimulation intensity levels. Statistical analysis indicated that the advantages of SDSS over SES in reducing muscle fatigue and enhancing force generation were significantly diminished at high intensity compared to moderate intensity. These findings provide valuable scientific insights into the practical applications of SDSS and contribute to a deeper understanding of its mechanisms in mitigating muscle fatigue. Further research is recommended to explore the effects of various stimulation parameters to optimize SDSS for different muscle groups and functional tasks.

高强度与中等强度空间分布序贯刺激对脊髓损伤患者的疗效:一项等距研究。
为了产生等距收缩,空间分布顺序刺激(SDSS)已被证明在减少疲劳和肌肉产生的功率输出方面优于传统的单电极刺激(SES)。然而,增产参数,特别是增产强度,对SDSS有效性的影响还没有得到充分的了解。本研究的目的是比较两种显著不同电刺激强度下SDSS对下肢运动完全性脊髓损伤患者的疲劳减轻能力,以了解刺激强度对SDSS有效性的影响。我们进行了两个实验,分别关注股四头肌群(实验1)和股外侧肌群(实验2)的等距收缩。以SES为参照,比较高强度SDSS和中强度SDSS的效果。7名脊髓损伤患者参与了这项研究。对两种电刺激强度水平下的疲劳和力指标,包括疲劳时间(TTF)和力-时间积分(FTI)进行了分析。统计分析表明,与中等强度相比,高强度时SDSS在减轻肌肉疲劳和增强力量生成方面的优势明显减弱。这些发现为SDSS的实际应用提供了有价值的科学见解,并有助于更深入地了解其缓解肌肉疲劳的机制。建议进一步研究各种刺激参数对不同肌肉群和功能任务的影响,以优化SDSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信