Haemodynamic monitoring and management during non-cardiac surgery: a survey among German anaesthesiologists.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Benjamin Vojnar, Patrick Achenbach, Moritz Flick, Daniel Reuter, Michael Sander, Bernd Saugel, Ann-Kristin Schubert, Christine Gaik
{"title":"Haemodynamic monitoring and management during non-cardiac surgery: a survey among German anaesthesiologists.","authors":"Benjamin Vojnar, Patrick Achenbach, Moritz Flick, Daniel Reuter, Michael Sander, Bernd Saugel, Ann-Kristin Schubert, Christine Gaik","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01284-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2023, the first German guideline on intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management for adults having non-cardiac surgery was published. The aim of this survey was to identify how anaesthetists in Germany managed intraoperative haemodynamics and blood pressure before its publication. In September to October 2023, members of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) were invited via email to participate in this anonymous online survey. Thirty-one questions covered demographics, clinical experience, approaches to perioperative blood pressure measurement and common thresholds, as well as the use of advanced haemodynamic monitoring and its potential therapeutic implications. 1,079 fully completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. When intermittent oscillometry was used to measure blood pressure, a 3-minute interval was usually applied during induction of anaesthesia (42%; 451/1,079). For invasive blood pressure monitoring, more than half (53%; 574/1,079) inserted an arterial line after induction of anaesthesia. Nearly all (94%; 1,012/1,079) focused on the mean arterial pressure for blood pressure monitoring, with a large majority (77%; 779/1012) considering values below 60-65 mmHg to be critically low. Intraoperative hypotension was managed based on an internal protocol by only 21% (223/1,079). Regarding advanced haemodynamic monitoring, 43% (459/1,079) frequently used pulse contour analysis, while 67% (721/1,079) reported that monitors with finger-cuff technology were not available in their department. 47% (504/1,079) cited a lack of experience as one of the main reasons for the infrequent use of cardiac output monitoring. This survey among DGAI members provides important insights into current practices of haemodynamic monitoring and management prior to the publication of the recent German guideline on 'Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery'.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01284-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2023, the first German guideline on intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management for adults having non-cardiac surgery was published. The aim of this survey was to identify how anaesthetists in Germany managed intraoperative haemodynamics and blood pressure before its publication. In September to October 2023, members of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) were invited via email to participate in this anonymous online survey. Thirty-one questions covered demographics, clinical experience, approaches to perioperative blood pressure measurement and common thresholds, as well as the use of advanced haemodynamic monitoring and its potential therapeutic implications. 1,079 fully completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. When intermittent oscillometry was used to measure blood pressure, a 3-minute interval was usually applied during induction of anaesthesia (42%; 451/1,079). For invasive blood pressure monitoring, more than half (53%; 574/1,079) inserted an arterial line after induction of anaesthesia. Nearly all (94%; 1,012/1,079) focused on the mean arterial pressure for blood pressure monitoring, with a large majority (77%; 779/1012) considering values below 60-65 mmHg to be critically low. Intraoperative hypotension was managed based on an internal protocol by only 21% (223/1,079). Regarding advanced haemodynamic monitoring, 43% (459/1,079) frequently used pulse contour analysis, while 67% (721/1,079) reported that monitors with finger-cuff technology were not available in their department. 47% (504/1,079) cited a lack of experience as one of the main reasons for the infrequent use of cardiac output monitoring. This survey among DGAI members provides important insights into current practices of haemodynamic monitoring and management prior to the publication of the recent German guideline on 'Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery'.

非心脏手术期间的血流动力学监测和管理:德国麻醉师的调查。
2023年,德国发布了首个非心脏手术成人术中血流动力学监测和管理指南。这项调查的目的是确定如何麻醉师在德国术中血流动力学和血压管理出版前。2023年9月至10月,通过电子邮件邀请德国麻醉与重症监护医学学会(DGAI)的成员参加这项匿名在线调查。31个问题包括人口统计学,临床经验,围手术期血压测量方法和常见阈值,以及先进血流动力学监测的使用及其潜在的治疗意义。1079份完整填写的问卷被纳入分析。当使用间歇振荡法测量血压时,通常在麻醉诱导期间间隔3分钟(42%;451/1,079)。对于有创血压监测,超过一半(53%;574/ 1079)麻醉诱导后插入动脉导管。几乎所有(94%;1012 / 1079)关注血压监测的平均动脉压,绝大多数(77%;779/1012)认为低于60-65毫米汞柱的值是极低的。术中低血压是根据内部方案管理的,只有21%(223/ 1079)。在先进的血流动力学监测方面,43%(459/ 1079)的患者经常使用脉搏轮廓分析,而67%(721/ 1079)的患者报告其所在科室没有采用袖带技术的监测仪。47%(504/ 1079)认为缺乏经验是不经常使用心输出量监测的主要原因之一。这项在DGAI成员中进行的调查,为最近德国“非心脏手术成人术中血流动力学监测和管理”指南出版之前的血流动力学监测和管理实践提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信