Empirical pharmacodynamic model of phenylephrine and intrathecal bupivacaine for mean arterial pressure prediction in obstetric patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Sherwin C Davoud, Basak Ozaslan, Eleonora M Aiello, Ricardo Kleinlein, Braden Eberhard, Hassan Hassan, Francis J Doyle, Vesela P Kovacheva
{"title":"Empirical pharmacodynamic model of phenylephrine and intrathecal bupivacaine for mean arterial pressure prediction in obstetric patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.","authors":"Sherwin C Davoud, Basak Ozaslan, Eleonora M Aiello, Ricardo Kleinlein, Braden Eberhard, Hassan Hassan, Francis J Doyle, Vesela P Kovacheva","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01288-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia may be complicated by hypotension in up to 80% of the patients. The response to standard-of-care prophylactic phenylephrine infusion varies, and there is little guidance on achieving optimal blood pressure control. In this work, we developed a data-driven pharmacodynamic relationship between intravenous phenylephrine, intrathecal bupivacaine, and maternal mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients presenting for cesarean delivery. In this single-center cohort study, secondary use data were available for normotensive patients presenting for cesarean delivery. Intraoperative MAP, intrathecal bupivacaine, and intravenous phenylephrine doses were recorded prospectively every minute. The recorded data were used to identify and confirm a time series (Autoregressive with Exogenous Input (ARX)) model for predicting the MAP using MATLAB 2021a System Identification Toolbox and the Prediction Error Method. An independent model validation was conducted using a second dataset collected after the model fitting stage. Model identification was performed on 172 patients, using 70% for model fitting and 30% for testing. The final ARX model, which takes the past three data points to make predictions, performed 48.9% better than a mean constant model for one-minute ahead MAP predictions with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.6 ± 1.3 mmHg. Similar performance was observed on independent validation using a second dataset (N = 84), yielding an RMSE of 4.2 ± 1.6 mmHg for one-minute ahead MAP predictions. Our ARX model showed good performance at up to a three-minute prediction horizon and could be used for future decision support applications to guide phenylephrine dose titration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01288-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia may be complicated by hypotension in up to 80% of the patients. The response to standard-of-care prophylactic phenylephrine infusion varies, and there is little guidance on achieving optimal blood pressure control. In this work, we developed a data-driven pharmacodynamic relationship between intravenous phenylephrine, intrathecal bupivacaine, and maternal mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients presenting for cesarean delivery. In this single-center cohort study, secondary use data were available for normotensive patients presenting for cesarean delivery. Intraoperative MAP, intrathecal bupivacaine, and intravenous phenylephrine doses were recorded prospectively every minute. The recorded data were used to identify and confirm a time series (Autoregressive with Exogenous Input (ARX)) model for predicting the MAP using MATLAB 2021a System Identification Toolbox and the Prediction Error Method. An independent model validation was conducted using a second dataset collected after the model fitting stage. Model identification was performed on 172 patients, using 70% for model fitting and 30% for testing. The final ARX model, which takes the past three data points to make predictions, performed 48.9% better than a mean constant model for one-minute ahead MAP predictions with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.6 ± 1.3 mmHg. Similar performance was observed on independent validation using a second dataset (N = 84), yielding an RMSE of 4.2 ± 1.6 mmHg for one-minute ahead MAP predictions. Our ARX model showed good performance at up to a three-minute prediction horizon and could be used for future decision support applications to guide phenylephrine dose titration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.