Continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure and end tidal carbon dioxide variations in traumatic brain injury: introducing the carbon dioxide reactivity index (CO2Rx).

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Paolo Gritti, Marco Bonfanti, Rosalia Zangari, Ezio Bonanomi, Maria Di Matteo, Davide Corbella, Alessia Farina, Lorenzo Lecchi, Tommaso Togni, Pietro Mandelli, Luigi Andrea Lanterna, Francesco Biroli, Ferdinando Luca Lorini
{"title":"Continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure and end tidal carbon dioxide variations in traumatic brain injury: introducing the carbon dioxide reactivity index (CO2Rx).","authors":"Paolo Gritti, Marco Bonfanti, Rosalia Zangari, Ezio Bonanomi, Maria Di Matteo, Davide Corbella, Alessia Farina, Lorenzo Lecchi, Tommaso Togni, Pietro Mandelli, Luigi Andrea Lanterna, Francesco Biroli, Ferdinando Luca Lorini","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01285-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The continuous monitoring of cerebral metabolic autoregulation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is poorly documented in the literature and largely absent from clinical practice. This study aimed to assess whether variations in intracranial pressure (ICP) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) can form the basis of an index for cerebrovascular autoregulation reactivity, and whether this index can improve the prediction of clinical outcomes in both adult and pediatric TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from adult and pediatric patients with severe TBI were retrospectively analyzed. The Carbon Dioxide Reactivity Index (CO2Rx) was introduced as a novel tool to assess cerebrovascular reactivity in response to variations in CO2 and ICP. CO2Rx was calculated by analyzing the relationship between ICP and ETCO2, sampled at approximately 5-minute intervals, using linear correlation within moving time windows ranging from 40 to 180 min in 10-minute increments. The discriminatory power of CO2Rx in predicting clinical outcomes was evaluated through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary outcome measures included in-hospital mortality and the 12-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 218 TBI patients (40 pediatric and 178 adult). CO2Rx values showed a significant correlation with outcomes, with a CO2Rx threshold of 0.28 effectively distinguishing between favorable and unfavorable outcomes. For the fatal/non-fatal outcome, the CO2Rx crude model alone had an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.737. When combined with other predictors (Impact Core + ICP + CO2Rx), this model achieved the highest AUC of 0.929.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CO2Rx demonstrated significant predictive value for mortality and unfavorable outcomes in TBI patients, serving as a continuous index of cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2. It holds potential to improve severe TBI management by optimizing the interaction between ventilation and metabolic autoregulation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT NCT05043545.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"581-594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01285-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The continuous monitoring of cerebral metabolic autoregulation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is poorly documented in the literature and largely absent from clinical practice. This study aimed to assess whether variations in intracranial pressure (ICP) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) can form the basis of an index for cerebrovascular autoregulation reactivity, and whether this index can improve the prediction of clinical outcomes in both adult and pediatric TBI patients.

Methods: Data from adult and pediatric patients with severe TBI were retrospectively analyzed. The Carbon Dioxide Reactivity Index (CO2Rx) was introduced as a novel tool to assess cerebrovascular reactivity in response to variations in CO2 and ICP. CO2Rx was calculated by analyzing the relationship between ICP and ETCO2, sampled at approximately 5-minute intervals, using linear correlation within moving time windows ranging from 40 to 180 min in 10-minute increments. The discriminatory power of CO2Rx in predicting clinical outcomes was evaluated through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary outcome measures included in-hospital mortality and the 12-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) score.

Results: The study included 218 TBI patients (40 pediatric and 178 adult). CO2Rx values showed a significant correlation with outcomes, with a CO2Rx threshold of 0.28 effectively distinguishing between favorable and unfavorable outcomes. For the fatal/non-fatal outcome, the CO2Rx crude model alone had an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.737. When combined with other predictors (Impact Core + ICP + CO2Rx), this model achieved the highest AUC of 0.929.

Conclusion: CO2Rx demonstrated significant predictive value for mortality and unfavorable outcomes in TBI patients, serving as a continuous index of cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2. It holds potential to improve severe TBI management by optimizing the interaction between ventilation and metabolic autoregulation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT NCT05043545.

外伤性脑损伤颅内压和末潮二氧化碳变化的连续监测:引入二氧化碳反应指数(CO2Rx)。
目的:对严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者脑代谢自身调节的持续监测在文献中很少有记录,在临床实践中很大程度上缺失。本研究旨在评估颅内压(ICP)和尾潮二氧化碳(ETCO2)的变化是否可以构成脑血管自调节反应性指标的基础,以及该指标是否可以改善成人和儿童TBI患者临床结局的预测。方法:回顾性分析成人和儿童重型脑外伤患者的资料。二氧化碳反应性指数(CO2Rx)是一种评估脑血管反应性对二氧化碳和ICP变化的新工具。CO2Rx是通过分析ICP和ETCO2之间的关系来计算的,每隔大约5分钟采样一次,在10分钟的移动时间窗口内使用线性相关性,从40到180分钟。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估CO2Rx预测临床结局的区分能力。主要结局指标包括住院死亡率和12个月格拉斯哥结局量表扩展(GOSE)评分。结果:研究纳入218例TBI患者(40例儿童,178例成人)。CO2Rx值与预后有显著相关性,CO2Rx阈值为0.28可以有效区分有利和不利的预后。对于致命/非致命结果,仅CO2Rx粗模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.737。当与其他预测因子(Impact Core + ICP + CO2Rx)结合时,该模型的AUC最高,为0.929。结论:CO2Rx可作为脑血管对CO2反应性的一项连续指标,对TBI患者的死亡率和不良结局具有显著的预测价值。通过优化通气和代谢自动调节之间的相互作用,它具有改善严重TBI管理的潜力。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT NCT05043545。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信