{"title":"Ontology-driven identification of inconsistencies in clinical data: A case study in lung cancer phenotyping","authors":"Yvon K. Awuklu , Fleur Mougin , Romain Griffier , Meghyn Bienvenu , Vianney Jouhet","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>To illustrate the use of an ontology in evaluating data quality in the medical field, focusing on phenotyping lung cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>We crafted an ontology to encapsulate crucial domain knowledge, leveraging it to query the Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) of Bordeaux University Hospital. Our work aimed at accurately representing domain knowledge and identifying inconsistencies through ontological axioms. Specifically, our aim was to pinpoint lung cancer patients with EGFR or ALK mutations treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We evaluated the ability of this ontology to retrieve and characterize patients in comparison with a traditional SQL queries executed on the CDW.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The ontology’s results closely aligned with those of the SQL queries. A sub-cohort of 60 lung cancer patients with conflicting information was identified, highlighting inconsistencies in the data. Moreover, the ontology complemented the existing data, uncovering additional information and enriching the dataset.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion:</h3><div>This work has highlighted challenges in managing temporal data and handling imperfect data. Addressing these challenges is essential for the effective use of CDW in phenotyping.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Ontologies improve data quality by identifying inconsistencies, enhancing data completeness, facilitating complex SQL queries, and standardize processes. Developing a framework to manage inconsistent healthcare data, considering its temporal nature, is essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
To illustrate the use of an ontology in evaluating data quality in the medical field, focusing on phenotyping lung cancers.
Materials and Methods:
We crafted an ontology to encapsulate crucial domain knowledge, leveraging it to query the Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) of Bordeaux University Hospital. Our work aimed at accurately representing domain knowledge and identifying inconsistencies through ontological axioms. Specifically, our aim was to pinpoint lung cancer patients with EGFR or ALK mutations treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We evaluated the ability of this ontology to retrieve and characterize patients in comparison with a traditional SQL queries executed on the CDW.
Results:
The ontology’s results closely aligned with those of the SQL queries. A sub-cohort of 60 lung cancer patients with conflicting information was identified, highlighting inconsistencies in the data. Moreover, the ontology complemented the existing data, uncovering additional information and enriching the dataset.
Discussion:
This work has highlighted challenges in managing temporal data and handling imperfect data. Addressing these challenges is essential for the effective use of CDW in phenotyping.
Conclusion:
Ontologies improve data quality by identifying inconsistencies, enhancing data completeness, facilitating complex SQL queries, and standardize processes. Developing a framework to manage inconsistent healthcare data, considering its temporal nature, is essential.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.