Welfare first: transforming harm reduction at UK festivals.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Joseph Janes
{"title":"Welfare first: transforming harm reduction at UK festivals.","authors":"Joseph Janes","doi":"10.1186/s12954-025-01184-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A welfare-first approach to harm reduction at UK festivals is emerging as a critical strategy for enhancing festival safety. In particular, the implementation of anonymous, non-punitive drug-checking services is posited as essential for reducing drug-related harm by enabling informed decision-making. This empirical study examines the limitations of punitive drug policies and the associated risks to public health and explores the potential benefits of decriminalisation in fostering safer festival environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed qualitative methodologies, including semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with festival attendees at three major UK festivals. This empirical data was supplemented by a review of recent studies (Ivers et al. in Ir J Med Sci 191(4):1701-1710, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02765-2 ; Palmer Maynard in Harm Reduc J 19(1):81, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00662-0 ; Cooney and Measham. in Drug Sci Policy Law 9, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503245231211444 ) and relevant policy documents, in order to evaluate current harm reduction practices and identify key barriers, such as stigma, social control, and criminalisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed that integrated harm reduction measures, comprising drug-checking services, welfare support, and early intervention initiatives, significantly enhance safety by empowering individuals with timely, accurate substance information. A majority of participants expressed a clear preference for drug-checking services, underscoring their willingness to engage when these services are provided in a supportive, non-punitive environment. However, persistent challenges related to punitive drug policies and gaps in public education about harm reduction continue to impede optimal service delivery. Evidence further suggests that a shift towards decriminalisation and welfare-based approaches could mitigate these risks and foster more trusting engagement with harm reduction initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that prioritising welfare-first harm reduction strategies, particularly the implementation of anonymous drug-checking services, can create safer festival environments and inform broader public health policies. The study underscores the need for policy reforms that move away from punitive approaches, suggesting that festival-based interventions can serve as scalable models for reducing drug-related harm across diverse community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01184-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A welfare-first approach to harm reduction at UK festivals is emerging as a critical strategy for enhancing festival safety. In particular, the implementation of anonymous, non-punitive drug-checking services is posited as essential for reducing drug-related harm by enabling informed decision-making. This empirical study examines the limitations of punitive drug policies and the associated risks to public health and explores the potential benefits of decriminalisation in fostering safer festival environments.

Methods: The study employed qualitative methodologies, including semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with festival attendees at three major UK festivals. This empirical data was supplemented by a review of recent studies (Ivers et al. in Ir J Med Sci 191(4):1701-1710, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02765-2 ; Palmer Maynard in Harm Reduc J 19(1):81, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00662-0 ; Cooney and Measham. in Drug Sci Policy Law 9, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503245231211444 ) and relevant policy documents, in order to evaluate current harm reduction practices and identify key barriers, such as stigma, social control, and criminalisation.

Results: Analysis revealed that integrated harm reduction measures, comprising drug-checking services, welfare support, and early intervention initiatives, significantly enhance safety by empowering individuals with timely, accurate substance information. A majority of participants expressed a clear preference for drug-checking services, underscoring their willingness to engage when these services are provided in a supportive, non-punitive environment. However, persistent challenges related to punitive drug policies and gaps in public education about harm reduction continue to impede optimal service delivery. Evidence further suggests that a shift towards decriminalisation and welfare-based approaches could mitigate these risks and foster more trusting engagement with harm reduction initiatives.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that prioritising welfare-first harm reduction strategies, particularly the implementation of anonymous drug-checking services, can create safer festival environments and inform broader public health policies. The study underscores the need for policy reforms that move away from punitive approaches, suggesting that festival-based interventions can serve as scalable models for reducing drug-related harm across diverse community settings.

福利第一:改变英国节日的危害减少。
背景:福利第一的方法,以减少伤害在英国节日正在成为提高节日安全的关键战略。特别是,实施匿名、非惩罚性的药物检查服务被认为是通过促进知情决策来减少与毒品有关的伤害的关键。本实证研究考察了惩罚性毒品政策的局限性和相关的公共卫生风险,并探讨了非刑事化在促进更安全的节日环境方面的潜在好处。方法:研究采用定性方法,包括半结构化访谈和问卷调查的节日参加者在三个主要的英国节日。这一实证数据通过对近期研究的回顾进行了补充(Ivers等人在Ir J Med Sci 191(4):1701- 1710,2022)。https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845 - 021 - 02765 - 2;中国农业科学学报,19(1):851 - 851。https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954 - 022 - 00662 - 0;库尼和Measham。《药物科学与政策法》第9期,2023。https://doi.org/10.1177/20503245231211444)和相关政策文件,以评估当前的减少伤害做法,并确定主要障碍,如污名化、社会控制和刑事定罪。结果:分析显示,综合减少危害措施,包括药物检查服务、福利支持和早期干预措施,通过赋予个人及时、准确的物质信息,显著提高了安全性。大多数与会者明确表示更倾向于药物检查服务,强调如果这些服务是在支持性和非惩罚性的环境中提供的,他们愿意参与。然而,与惩罚性药物政策和减少危害的公共教育方面的差距有关的持续挑战继续阻碍最佳服务的提供。证据进一步表明,转向非犯罪化和基于福利的方法可以减轻这些风险,并促进对减少伤害倡议的更信任参与。结论:研究结果表明,优先考虑福利优先的减少危害策略,特别是实施匿名药物检查服务,可以创造更安全的节日环境,并为更广泛的公共卫生政策提供信息。这项研究强调了政策改革的必要性,即摆脱惩罚性措施,表明以节日为基础的干预措施可以作为可扩展的模式,在不同的社区环境中减少与毒品有关的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信