Drug testing after use: what insights can be gained from a harm reduction perspective on visitors of the drugs information and monitoring system (DIMS) in the Netherlands?

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Stefania Schiavone, Nadia Robert Petronella Wilhelmina Hutten, Maria Bove, Maria Grazia Morgese, Luigia Trabace, Laura Alexandra Smit-Rigter
{"title":"Drug testing after use: what insights can be gained from a harm reduction perspective on visitors of the drugs information and monitoring system (DIMS) in the Netherlands?","authors":"Stefania Schiavone, Nadia Robert Petronella Wilhelmina Hutten, Maria Bove, Maria Grazia Morgese, Luigia Trabace, Laura Alexandra Smit-Rigter","doi":"10.1186/s12954-025-01176-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interventions aimed to mitigate drug-related harm include drug checking, which invloves a chemical analysis of a drug sample alongside personalized harm reduction advise. The Drug Information and Monitoring System (DIMS) represents a network of Drug Checking Services (DCS) in the Netherlands, which people who use drugs (PWUD) may visit before consumption, though not consistently. This paper describes the characteristics and experienced effects of PWUD who have their drugs tested after use, in relation to the analysis results of the submitted drug sample and the setting of use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected between 2018 until 2022 encompassing a range of characteristics provided by the visitors. Statistical analyses were performed to find associations between the type of effects the visitor experienced and the (mis)match with the expected content of the drug sample or setting in which the sample was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14% (N = 9472) of all samples submitted to DIMS (N = 66150) were used prior to attending a DCS. The majority of samples were sold as ecstasy (41%, N = 3460) and cocaine (17%, N = 1407). Most visitors were male (75%, N = 6359), purchased their drugs offline (96%, N = 8081), and reported having used the sample at a party/festival (43%, N = 3614), while 27% (N = 2320) used it in a home setting. Half of the visitors (49%, N = 4109) declared not having used the sample in combination with other psychoactive substances. Positive mental effects were less likely to be experienced when the detected drug content did not match the expected content, while negative mental effects were more likely. Moreover, visitors consuming their sample at a party/festival were more likely to experience positive mental and physical effects and less likely to experience negative mental and physical effects compared to people consuming their sample at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By identifying the characteristics of PWUD who have their drugs tested after use and by demonstrating that not only a (mis)match with the expected drug content, but also the setting in which the substance was used was associated with the drug experience, improved strategies can be developed to encourage individuals to visit a DCS before consumption, thereby reducing drug-related harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01176-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interventions aimed to mitigate drug-related harm include drug checking, which invloves a chemical analysis of a drug sample alongside personalized harm reduction advise. The Drug Information and Monitoring System (DIMS) represents a network of Drug Checking Services (DCS) in the Netherlands, which people who use drugs (PWUD) may visit before consumption, though not consistently. This paper describes the characteristics and experienced effects of PWUD who have their drugs tested after use, in relation to the analysis results of the submitted drug sample and the setting of use.

Methods: Data was collected between 2018 until 2022 encompassing a range of characteristics provided by the visitors. Statistical analyses were performed to find associations between the type of effects the visitor experienced and the (mis)match with the expected content of the drug sample or setting in which the sample was used.

Results: 14% (N = 9472) of all samples submitted to DIMS (N = 66150) were used prior to attending a DCS. The majority of samples were sold as ecstasy (41%, N = 3460) and cocaine (17%, N = 1407). Most visitors were male (75%, N = 6359), purchased their drugs offline (96%, N = 8081), and reported having used the sample at a party/festival (43%, N = 3614), while 27% (N = 2320) used it in a home setting. Half of the visitors (49%, N = 4109) declared not having used the sample in combination with other psychoactive substances. Positive mental effects were less likely to be experienced when the detected drug content did not match the expected content, while negative mental effects were more likely. Moreover, visitors consuming their sample at a party/festival were more likely to experience positive mental and physical effects and less likely to experience negative mental and physical effects compared to people consuming their sample at home.

Conclusions: By identifying the characteristics of PWUD who have their drugs tested after use and by demonstrating that not only a (mis)match with the expected drug content, but also the setting in which the substance was used was associated with the drug experience, improved strategies can be developed to encourage individuals to visit a DCS before consumption, thereby reducing drug-related harm.

使用后的药物检测:从减少危害的角度来看,可以从荷兰药物信息和监测系统(DIMS)的访问者获得哪些见解?
背景:旨在减轻药物相关危害的干预措施包括药物检查,包括药物样本的化学分析以及个性化的减少危害建议。药物信息和监测系统(DIMS)代表了荷兰的药物检查服务(DCS)网络,吸毒者(PWUD)可能会在消费前访问该网络,尽管不是始终如此。本文结合所提交药物样本的分析结果和使用设置,介绍了服药后接受药物检测的患者的特点和经历的影响。方法:从2018年到2022年收集数据,包括游客提供的一系列特征。进行了统计分析,以发现参观者所经历的影响类型与药物样本的预期含量或使用样本的环境(错误)匹配之间的关联。结果:提交给DIMS (N = 66150)的所有样本中有14% (N = 9472)在参加DCS之前使用。大部分样品以摇头丸(41%,N = 3460)和可卡因(17%,N = 1407)的形式出售。大多数访客是男性(75%,N = 6359),线下购买药物(96%,N = 8081),并报告在聚会/节日中使用样本(43%,N = 3614),而27% (N = 2320)在家庭环境中使用。一半的来访者(49%,N = 4109)声称没有将样本与其他精神活性物质结合使用。当检测到的药物含量与预期含量不匹配时,积极的心理效应较少,而消极的心理效应更容易出现。此外,与在家消费样本的人相比,在聚会/节日中消费样本的游客更有可能体验到积极的心理和身体影响,而不太可能体验到消极的心理和身体影响。结论:通过确定在使用药物后进行药物测试的PWUD的特征,并通过证明不仅与预期药物含量(错误)匹配,而且使用该物质的环境与药物体验相关,可以制定改进的策略,鼓励个人在使用前访问DCS,从而减少与药物相关的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信