Is the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test with the bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay affected by proton pump inhibitors?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestion Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1159/000545347
Chika Kusano, Koshiro Tsutsumi, Toshiki Horii, Sho Suzuki, Hirofumi Kiyokawa, Tadateru Maehata, Itsuko Hirayama, Shinya Minami, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Ryuji Nagahama
{"title":"Is the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test with the bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay affected by proton pump inhibitors?","authors":"Chika Kusano, Koshiro Tsutsumi, Toshiki Horii, Sho Suzuki, Hirofumi Kiyokawa, Tadateru Maehata, Itsuko Hirayama, Shinya Minami, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Ryuji Nagahama","doi":"10.1159/000545347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can lead to false-negative results in Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) testing. A new bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay (BLEIA)-based HpSA test was introduced. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of this test in patients on PPIs and compare its sensitivity with that of the enzyme immunoassay (EIA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients without a history of H. pylori eradication who were diagnosed as H. pylori-positive via culture, microscopy, rapid urease tests, urea breath tests, serum H. pylori antibody tests, or HpSA tests. The sensitivity of HpSA detection was compared among patients based on their PPI intake using both BLEIA and conventional EIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrolment occurred from December 2020 to July 2022 across 10 facilities, with 109 patients enrolled in both the PPI and non-PPI groups. The sensitivity of BLEIA was 65.9% in the PPI group and 87.1% in the non-PPI group, showing a difference of -22.0% (95% CI: -11.0% to -32.9%) (P=0.0003). For EIA, the sensitivity was 54.1% in the PPI group and 72.4% in the non-PPI group, with a difference of -18.3% (95% CI: -5.5% to -30.4%) (P=0.0076). Significant differences in sensitivity were observed for both BLEIA and EIA between the PPI and non-PPI groups (p=0.005 and p<0.0001, respectively), with BLEIA demonstrating higher sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicated that the sensitivity of HpSA detection using BLEIA decreased under PPI administration. Additionally, BLEIA may have higher sensitivity than EIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can lead to false-negative results in Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) testing. A new bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay (BLEIA)-based HpSA test was introduced. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of this test in patients on PPIs and compare its sensitivity with that of the enzyme immunoassay (EIA).

Methods: We included patients without a history of H. pylori eradication who were diagnosed as H. pylori-positive via culture, microscopy, rapid urease tests, urea breath tests, serum H. pylori antibody tests, or HpSA tests. The sensitivity of HpSA detection was compared among patients based on their PPI intake using both BLEIA and conventional EIA.

Results: Enrolment occurred from December 2020 to July 2022 across 10 facilities, with 109 patients enrolled in both the PPI and non-PPI groups. The sensitivity of BLEIA was 65.9% in the PPI group and 87.1% in the non-PPI group, showing a difference of -22.0% (95% CI: -11.0% to -32.9%) (P=0.0003). For EIA, the sensitivity was 54.1% in the PPI group and 72.4% in the non-PPI group, with a difference of -18.3% (95% CI: -5.5% to -30.4%) (P=0.0076). Significant differences in sensitivity were observed for both BLEIA and EIA between the PPI and non-PPI groups (p=0.005 and p<0.0001, respectively), with BLEIA demonstrating higher sensitivity.

Conclusions: This study indicated that the sensitivity of HpSA detection using BLEIA decreased under PPI administration. Additionally, BLEIA may have higher sensitivity than EIA.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信