Current use of donor lymphocyte infusions after allogenic stem cell transplantation in Europe: a survey on behalf of the cellular therapy and immunobiology working party of the EBMT

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Nicole Santoro, Christoph Schmid, Moniek de Witte, Mieke W. H. Roeven, Victoria Potter, Deborah Richardson, Thomas Schroeder, Veronika Válková, Katherine Clesham, Sandrine Loron, Jakob Passweg, Caroline Besley, Bernd Gruhn, Jorinde D. Hoogenboom, Jarl E. Mooyaart, Isabel Sanchez-Ortega, Simona Pagliuca, Federico Simonetta, Giorgia Battipaglia, Thierry Guillaume, Mette D. Hazenberg, Florent Malard, Jürgen Kuball, Annalisa Ruggeri
{"title":"Current use of donor lymphocyte infusions after allogenic stem cell transplantation in Europe: a survey on behalf of the cellular therapy and immunobiology working party of the EBMT","authors":"Nicole Santoro, Christoph Schmid, Moniek de Witte, Mieke W. H. Roeven, Victoria Potter, Deborah Richardson, Thomas Schroeder, Veronika Válková, Katherine Clesham, Sandrine Loron, Jakob Passweg, Caroline Besley, Bernd Gruhn, Jorinde D. Hoogenboom, Jarl E. Mooyaart, Isabel Sanchez-Ortega, Simona Pagliuca, Federico Simonetta, Giorgia Battipaglia, Thierry Guillaume, Mette D. Hazenberg, Florent Malard, Jürgen Kuball, Annalisa Ruggeri","doi":"10.1038/s41409-025-02555-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are crucial for enhancing the graft versus tumor (GVT) effect in post-transplant settings. Practices regarding DLI use vary widely among centers, encompassing differences in indications, prerequisites, and application methods. To explore current DLI policies, we developed a comprehensive survey that garnered responses from 165 EBMT centers across 43 countries. Notably, 97% of respondents reported using DLI in their practices. Indications for DLI included preemptive use for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity in 86.9% of centers and mixed chimerism in 73.1%; therapeutic use for hematological relapse in 73.1%; and prophylactic use for high-risk disease in 43.8%. Active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and active infections were deemed absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of centers, respectively. 35% of centers did not consider a prior history of acute (a)GVHD as an exclusion criterion. The majority (71.9%) requested immunosuppression withdrawal before DLI. Most centers (71.3%) collected DLI post-transplant, with 78.1% utilizing unstimulated apheresis. The cell doses applied at the first DLI varied significantly, depending on indication, timing, and donor type. This survey provides the largest overview of current DLI practices, highlighting the need for high-quality data to assess the risks and benefits of different approaches.","PeriodicalId":9126,"journal":{"name":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","volume":"60 5","pages":"697-701"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-025-02555-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are crucial for enhancing the graft versus tumor (GVT) effect in post-transplant settings. Practices regarding DLI use vary widely among centers, encompassing differences in indications, prerequisites, and application methods. To explore current DLI policies, we developed a comprehensive survey that garnered responses from 165 EBMT centers across 43 countries. Notably, 97% of respondents reported using DLI in their practices. Indications for DLI included preemptive use for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity in 86.9% of centers and mixed chimerism in 73.1%; therapeutic use for hematological relapse in 73.1%; and prophylactic use for high-risk disease in 43.8%. Active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and active infections were deemed absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of centers, respectively. 35% of centers did not consider a prior history of acute (a)GVHD as an exclusion criterion. The majority (71.9%) requested immunosuppression withdrawal before DLI. Most centers (71.3%) collected DLI post-transplant, with 78.1% utilizing unstimulated apheresis. The cell doses applied at the first DLI varied significantly, depending on indication, timing, and donor type. This survey provides the largest overview of current DLI practices, highlighting the need for high-quality data to assess the risks and benefits of different approaches.

Abstract Image

欧洲同种异体干细胞移植后供体淋巴细胞输注的当前使用:代表EBMT细胞治疗和免疫生物学工作组的一项调查。
未经处理的供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)是增强移植后移植物抗肿瘤(GVT)效果的关键。各中心关于DLI使用的实践差异很大,包括适应症、先决条件和应用方法的差异。为了探索当前的DLI政策,我们开展了一项综合调查,收集了43个国家165个EBMT中心的反馈。值得注意的是,97%的受访者报告在他们的实践中使用了DLI。DLI的适应症包括:86.9%的中心为微小残留病(MRD)阳性,73.1%的中心为混合嵌合;治疗用于血液学复发的占73.1%;高危疾病预防性用药占43.8%。活动性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)和活动性感染分别被85.6%和57.5%的中心视为绝对禁忌症。35%的中心没有将急性(a)GVHD病史作为排除标准。大多数患者(71.9%)要求在DLI前停用免疫抑制药物。大多数中心(71.3%)在移植后收集DLI,其中78.1%使用无刺激单采。根据适应症、时间和供体类型的不同,第一次DLI时的细胞剂量变化很大。该调查提供了当前DLI实践的最大概述,强调了对高质量数据的需求,以评估不同方法的风险和收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Bone Marrow Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
337
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes high quality, peer reviewed original research that addresses all aspects of basic biology and clinical use of haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. The broad scope of the journal thus encompasses topics such as stem cell biology, e.g., kinetics and cytokine control, transplantation immunology e.g., HLA and matching techniques, translational research, and clinical results of specific transplant protocols. Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes 24 issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信