Implementation of a nurse-delivered, community-based liver screening and assessment program for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (LOCATE-NAFLD trial).

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michelle J Allen, Ruth Tulleners, David Brain, James O'Beirne, Elizabeth E Powell, Adrian Barnett, Patricia C Valery, Sanjeewa Kularatna, Ingrid J Hickman
{"title":"Implementation of a nurse-delivered, community-based liver screening and assessment program for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (LOCATE-NAFLD trial).","authors":"Michelle J Allen, Ruth Tulleners, David Brain, James O'Beirne, Elizabeth E Powell, Adrian Barnett, Patricia C Valery, Sanjeewa Kularatna, Ingrid J Hickman","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12580-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the high burden of Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), (previously known as Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - NAFLD) in the community, current models of care that require specialist review for disease risk stratification overwhelm hospital clinic capacity and create inefficiencies in care. The LOCal Assessment and Triage Evaluation of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (LOCATE-NAFLD) randomised trial compared usual care to a community-based nurse delivered liver risk assessment. This study evaluates the implementation strategy of the LOCATE model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The evaluation used mixed methods (quantitative trial data and qualitative framework analysis of semi-structured interviews) to explore the general practitioner (GP) and patient perspectives of acceptability (Acceptability Framework), and factors associated with reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM framework) of the LOCATE model of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LOCATE model was considered highly acceptable by both patients and GPs. The model of care achieved appropriate reach across the participating health services, reaching high-risk patients faster than usual care and with predominantly positive patient experiences. A notable reduction in anxiety and stress was experienced in the intervention group due to the shorter waiting times between referral and assessment. There was an overall perception of confidence in nursing staff capability to perform the community-based screening and GPs indicated confidence in managing low-risk MASLD without the need for specialist review. Challenges to implementation, adoption and maintenance included variable prioritisation of liver disease assessment in complex cases, the need for further GP training in MASLD assessment and treatment pathways, available funding and referral pathways for community screening, and accessibility of effective diet and exercise professional support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse delivered community-based liver screening is highly acceptable to GPs and patients and has shown to be an effective mechanism to identify high risk patients. Adoption and maintenance of the model of care faces significant challenges related to affordable access to screening, prioritisation of liver disease in complex patient cohorts, and unresolved difficulties in prescribing effective strategies for sustained lifestyle intervention in the primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered on 30 January 2020 and can be found via Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12620000158965.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12580-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the high burden of Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), (previously known as Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - NAFLD) in the community, current models of care that require specialist review for disease risk stratification overwhelm hospital clinic capacity and create inefficiencies in care. The LOCal Assessment and Triage Evaluation of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (LOCATE-NAFLD) randomised trial compared usual care to a community-based nurse delivered liver risk assessment. This study evaluates the implementation strategy of the LOCATE model.

Methods: The evaluation used mixed methods (quantitative trial data and qualitative framework analysis of semi-structured interviews) to explore the general practitioner (GP) and patient perspectives of acceptability (Acceptability Framework), and factors associated with reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM framework) of the LOCATE model of care.

Results: The LOCATE model was considered highly acceptable by both patients and GPs. The model of care achieved appropriate reach across the participating health services, reaching high-risk patients faster than usual care and with predominantly positive patient experiences. A notable reduction in anxiety and stress was experienced in the intervention group due to the shorter waiting times between referral and assessment. There was an overall perception of confidence in nursing staff capability to perform the community-based screening and GPs indicated confidence in managing low-risk MASLD without the need for specialist review. Challenges to implementation, adoption and maintenance included variable prioritisation of liver disease assessment in complex cases, the need for further GP training in MASLD assessment and treatment pathways, available funding and referral pathways for community screening, and accessibility of effective diet and exercise professional support.

Conclusion: Nurse delivered community-based liver screening is highly acceptable to GPs and patients and has shown to be an effective mechanism to identify high risk patients. Adoption and maintenance of the model of care faces significant challenges related to affordable access to screening, prioritisation of liver disease in complex patient cohorts, and unresolved difficulties in prescribing effective strategies for sustained lifestyle intervention in the primary care setting.

Trial registration: The trial was registered on 30 January 2020 and can be found via Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12620000158965.

实施一项由护士提供的、基于社区的代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病患者肝脏筛查和评估项目(LOCATE-NAFLD试验)。
背景:随着代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MASLD)(以前称为非酒精性脂肪性肝病- NAFLD)在社区中的高负担,目前需要专家审查疾病风险分层的护理模式使医院诊所不堪重负,并造成护理效率低下。非酒精性脂肪性肝病的局部评估和分诊评估(LOCATE-NAFLD)随机试验比较了常规护理和社区护士提供的肝脏风险评估。本研究评估了LOCATE模型的实施策略。方法:采用混合方法(定量试验数据和半结构化访谈的定性框架分析)来探讨全科医生(GP)和患者对LOCATE护理模式的可接受性(可接受性框架)以及与范围、有效性、采用、实施和维持(RE-AIM框架)相关的因素。结果:LOCATE模型被患者和全科医生高度接受。这种护理模式在所有参与的保健服务机构中实现了适当的覆盖,比通常的护理更快地到达高危患者,并且患者的体验主要是积极的。由于转诊和评估之间的等待时间较短,干预组的焦虑和压力明显减少。总体而言,对护理人员执行社区筛查的能力有信心,全科医生表示对管理低风险MASLD有信心,无需专家审查。实施、采用和维持的挑战包括复杂病例中肝病评估的不同优先顺序,需要在MASLD评估和治疗途径方面进行进一步的全科医生培训,社区筛查的现有资金和转诊途径,以及获得有效的饮食和运动专业支持。结论:护士提供的社区肝脏筛查被全科医生和患者高度接受,并已被证明是识别高危患者的有效机制。采用和维持护理模式面临着重大挑战,这些挑战涉及可负担得起的筛查,复杂患者队列中肝病的优先排序,以及在初级保健环境中为持续生活方式干预制定有效策略方面尚未解决的困难。试验注册:该试验于2020年1月30日注册,可通过澳大利亚新西兰临床试验登记处(ANZCTR) - ACTRN12620000158965找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信