Treatment decision-making and treatment experiences in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Sandra Doveson, Per Fransson, Lena Axelsson, Agneta Wennman-Larsen
{"title":"Treatment decision-making and treatment experiences in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.","authors":"Sandra Doveson, Per Fransson, Lena Axelsson, Agneta Wennman-Larsen","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>For the most advanced stage of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), several life-prolonging treatments have become available over the past decade. Treatment decision-making (TDM) and experiences in this phase are yet to be studied. Hence, this study aimed to describe men's satisfaction with TDM and treatment experiences during the first 12 months of a life-prolonging treatment of mCRPC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective study included 104 men with mCRPC who started and remained on the same life-prolonging treatment for 12 months. They received a questionnaire on TDM, treatment experiences, and well-being every 3 months. Correlation analyses explored associations between satisfaction with TDM at baseline and treatment experiences and well-being over time.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>The participants (median age: 77 years) generally reported high satisfaction with physician- and nurse communication and confidence/trust at baseline (>55% reported the highest satisfaction in all questions), but lower satisfaction with communication regarding how the treatments could affect them - up to 40% reported not having talked about that at all. Treatment experiences and physical- and emotional well-being remained stable over time. Associations were found between satisfaction with TDM at baseline and how they rated the treatment as a whole at six months, and well-being at six and 12 months. In mCRPC, men's TDM preferences need to be explored, and shared decision-making needs to be facilitated when considering treatment. Furthermore, clinicians need to discuss how the treatment might affect patients' everyday lives when discussing life-prolonging treatments with them.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"462-469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: For the most advanced stage of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), several life-prolonging treatments have become available over the past decade. Treatment decision-making (TDM) and experiences in this phase are yet to be studied. Hence, this study aimed to describe men's satisfaction with TDM and treatment experiences during the first 12 months of a life-prolonging treatment of mCRPC.

Patients and methods: This prospective study included 104 men with mCRPC who started and remained on the same life-prolonging treatment for 12 months. They received a questionnaire on TDM, treatment experiences, and well-being every 3 months. Correlation analyses explored associations between satisfaction with TDM at baseline and treatment experiences and well-being over time.

Results and interpretation: The participants (median age: 77 years) generally reported high satisfaction with physician- and nurse communication and confidence/trust at baseline (>55% reported the highest satisfaction in all questions), but lower satisfaction with communication regarding how the treatments could affect them - up to 40% reported not having talked about that at all. Treatment experiences and physical- and emotional well-being remained stable over time. Associations were found between satisfaction with TDM at baseline and how they rated the treatment as a whole at six months, and well-being at six and 12 months. In mCRPC, men's TDM preferences need to be explored, and shared decision-making needs to be facilitated when considering treatment. Furthermore, clinicians need to discuss how the treatment might affect patients' everyday lives when discussing life-prolonging treatments with them.

男性转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗决策与治疗经验。
背景和目的:对于晚期转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC),在过去的十年中已经有了几种延长生命的治疗方法。治疗决策(TDM)和这一阶段的经验还有待研究。因此,本研究旨在描述男性在mCRPC延长生命治疗的前12个月对TDM的满意度和治疗经历。患者和方法:这项前瞻性研究包括104名mCRPC患者,他们开始并持续接受相同的延长生命治疗12个月。他们每3个月收到一份关于TDM、治疗经历和幸福感的问卷。相关分析探讨了基线时TDM满意度与治疗经历和长期幸福感之间的关系。结果和解释:参与者(中位年龄:77岁)在基线时普遍对医生和护士的沟通和信心/信任表示高度满意(55%的人在所有问题中表示满意度最高),但对治疗如何影响他们的沟通的满意度较低-高达40%的人表示根本没有谈论过这一点。随着时间的推移,治疗经历和身心健康保持稳定。基线时对TDM的满意度与他们在6个月时对整个治疗的评价以及6个月和12个月时的幸福感之间存在关联。在mCRPC中,需要探索男性的TDM偏好,并在考虑治疗时促进共同决策。此外,临床医生在与患者讨论延长生命的治疗方法时,需要讨论治疗如何影响患者的日常生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信