A Comparison of the Effect of Two Doses of Oral Melatonin as Premedication on Orientation Score, Induction Compliance, and Emergency Agitation of Children Undergoing Elective Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/anrp/8832216
Haider Muhy Al Bareh, Mohammed Jawad Kadhim Al Kidsawi, Zainab Zuhair Knaish Al Ghrabiu, Mohamed Kahloul
{"title":"A Comparison of the Effect of Two Doses of Oral Melatonin as Premedication on Orientation Score, Induction Compliance, and Emergency Agitation of Children Undergoing Elective Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial.","authors":"Haider Muhy Al Bareh, Mohammed Jawad Kadhim Al Kidsawi, Zainab Zuhair Knaish Al Ghrabiu, Mohamed Kahloul","doi":"10.1155/anrp/8832216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Following sedation or general anesthesia, emergent agitation (EA) presents as a sequence of abrupt, complicated psychomotor problems marked by perceptual abnormalities, delusions, and disorientation. Studies have proved that melatonin significantly decreases the incidence of postoperative agitation in children after anesthesia. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two doses of oral melatonin as a premedication for orientation score, induction compliance, and emergency agitation of children undergoing surgeries. <b>Methods:</b> In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 126 children, aged 4-14, of either sex, with an ASA I or II, scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to get either melatonin 0.4 mg/kg (Group M4) or melatonin 0.2 mg/kg (Group M2), with 63 kids in each group. All children have had the same anesthetic strategy. As a primary outcome, orientation score, induction compliance to intravenous induction anesthesia, and decreased emergency agitation were assessed. <b>Results:</b> Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics and baseline data. Orientation scores were similar between the groups. Preoperatively, all patients were oriented in both time and place. The two groups had no statistically significant difference according to induction compliance distribution (<i>p</i>=0.065). There was a statistically significant difference in agitation behavior after 5, 10, and 15 min postoperatively in M 4, 2, and total participants (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> In pediatric surgical patients, the melatonin dosage does not affect children's compliance with induction but impacts their postoperative behavior by reducing the likelihood of agitation. Administering oral melatonin before surgery could potentially aid in managing postoperative delirium in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8832216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/8832216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following sedation or general anesthesia, emergent agitation (EA) presents as a sequence of abrupt, complicated psychomotor problems marked by perceptual abnormalities, delusions, and disorientation. Studies have proved that melatonin significantly decreases the incidence of postoperative agitation in children after anesthesia. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two doses of oral melatonin as a premedication for orientation score, induction compliance, and emergency agitation of children undergoing surgeries. Methods: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 126 children, aged 4-14, of either sex, with an ASA I or II, scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to get either melatonin 0.4 mg/kg (Group M4) or melatonin 0.2 mg/kg (Group M2), with 63 kids in each group. All children have had the same anesthetic strategy. As a primary outcome, orientation score, induction compliance to intravenous induction anesthesia, and decreased emergency agitation were assessed. Results: Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics and baseline data. Orientation scores were similar between the groups. Preoperatively, all patients were oriented in both time and place. The two groups had no statistically significant difference according to induction compliance distribution (p=0.065). There was a statistically significant difference in agitation behavior after 5, 10, and 15 min postoperatively in M 4, 2, and total participants (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In pediatric surgical patients, the melatonin dosage does not affect children's compliance with induction but impacts their postoperative behavior by reducing the likelihood of agitation. Administering oral melatonin before surgery could potentially aid in managing postoperative delirium in children.

两种剂量口服褪黑素作为预用药对择期手术儿童取向评分、诱导依从性和紧急躁动的影响:一项双盲随机试验
背景:镇静或全身麻醉后,突发性躁动(EA)表现为一系列突发性、复杂的精神运动问题,其特征是知觉异常、妄想和定向障碍。研究证明,褪黑素可显著降低麻醉后患儿术后躁动的发生率。本研究的主要目的是比较两种剂量的口服褪黑素作为手术儿童定向评分、诱导依从性和紧急躁动的前用药的有效性。方法:在这项双盲随机对照试验中,126名年龄为4-14岁,ASA为I级或II级,计划择期手术的儿童,随机分为0.4 mg/kg (M4组)和0.2 mg/kg (M2组)两组,每组63名儿童。所有的孩子都使用了相同的麻醉策略。作为主要结局,取向评分,诱导依从性静脉诱导麻醉,减少紧急躁动进行了评估。结果:两组在人口学特征和基线数据方面具有可比性。两组之间的迎新能力得分相似。术前对所有患者进行时间、地点定位。两组诱导依从性分布差异无统计学意义(p=0.065)。术后5、10、15分钟的躁动行为在m4、m2和总参与者中有统计学差异(p < 0.001)。结论:在小儿外科患者中,褪黑激素的剂量不影响患儿对诱导的依从性,但通过减少躁动的可能性影响患儿术后行为。术前口服褪黑素可能有助于治疗儿童术后谵妄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信