Characteristics and outcomes of older patients undergoing out- versus inpatient surgery in Europe. A secondary analysis of the Peri-interventional Outcome Study in the Elderly (POSE).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Linda Grüßer, Mark Coburn, Matthias Schmid, Rolf Rossaint, Sebastian Ziemann, Ana Kowark
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of older patients undergoing out- versus inpatient surgery in Europe. A secondary analysis of the Peri-interventional Outcome Study in the Elderly (POSE).","authors":"Linda Grüßer, Mark Coburn, Matthias Schmid, Rolf Rossaint, Sebastian Ziemann, Ana Kowark","doi":"10.1111/aas.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of older patients undergoing surgical procedures with anaesthesia care is projected to rise. In order to cope with the increased demand, the expansion of outpatient surgery may play a decisive role. We aim to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of the older outpatient population.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The Peri-interventional Outcome Study in the Elderly in Europe (POSE) was a prospective multicenter study investigating characteristics and outcomes in 9497 patients aged 80 years and older undergoing a procedure with anaesthesia care. This secondary analysis of the POSE data investigated characteristics, functional and cognitive outcomes, and mortality in the outpatient in comparison to the inpatient population. Functional status was assessed as independent, partially dependent, and totally dependent at baseline and 30 days postinterventional. Cognitive status was defined by the number of recalled words (0-3) in the Mini-Cog test and brief cognitive screening at baseline and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 9497 older patients, 7562 were planned inpatients and 1935 planned outpatients. Older outpatients presented with fewer comorbidities and fewer medications than older inpatients and underwent minor procedures more often Their baseline functional status was more often independent, and they had a higher estimated probability of staying independent. Outpatients recalled three words at baseline and follow-up more often than inpatients. The estimated 30-day survival probabilities with 95% confidence intervals were 0.997 [0.994; 0.999] in the group with planned outpatient surgery and 0.948 [0.942; 0.953] with planned inpatient surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that functional and cognitive status at baseline and follow-up were higher in planned outpatients than in planned inpatients. However, only short screening tools for the assessment of functional and cognitive status were used. Overall, outpatient interventions were associated with low mortality. Further research is recommended to develop scores that facilitate the identification of patients suitable for outpatient surgery.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This secondary analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of elderly surgical cases in Europe describes case factors related to inpatient compared to outpatient surgical interventions. The findings show that inpatient or outpatient surgery selection is associated with different degrees of risk for important perioperative outcomes in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of older patients undergoing surgical procedures with anaesthesia care is projected to rise. In order to cope with the increased demand, the expansion of outpatient surgery may play a decisive role. We aim to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of the older outpatient population.

Patients and methods: The Peri-interventional Outcome Study in the Elderly in Europe (POSE) was a prospective multicenter study investigating characteristics and outcomes in 9497 patients aged 80 years and older undergoing a procedure with anaesthesia care. This secondary analysis of the POSE data investigated characteristics, functional and cognitive outcomes, and mortality in the outpatient in comparison to the inpatient population. Functional status was assessed as independent, partially dependent, and totally dependent at baseline and 30 days postinterventional. Cognitive status was defined by the number of recalled words (0-3) in the Mini-Cog test and brief cognitive screening at baseline and follow-up.

Results: Out of the 9497 older patients, 7562 were planned inpatients and 1935 planned outpatients. Older outpatients presented with fewer comorbidities and fewer medications than older inpatients and underwent minor procedures more often Their baseline functional status was more often independent, and they had a higher estimated probability of staying independent. Outpatients recalled three words at baseline and follow-up more often than inpatients. The estimated 30-day survival probabilities with 95% confidence intervals were 0.997 [0.994; 0.999] in the group with planned outpatient surgery and 0.948 [0.942; 0.953] with planned inpatient surgery.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that functional and cognitive status at baseline and follow-up were higher in planned outpatients than in planned inpatients. However, only short screening tools for the assessment of functional and cognitive status were used. Overall, outpatient interventions were associated with low mortality. Further research is recommended to develop scores that facilitate the identification of patients suitable for outpatient surgery.

Editorial comment: This secondary analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of elderly surgical cases in Europe describes case factors related to inpatient compared to outpatient surgical interventions. The findings show that inpatient or outpatient surgery selection is associated with different degrees of risk for important perioperative outcomes in this cohort.

在欧洲接受门诊手术与住院手术的老年患者的特点和结果。老年人介入期结局研究(POSE)的二次分析。
背景:在麻醉护理下接受外科手术的老年患者数量预计会上升。为了应对日益增长的需求,门诊手术的扩大可能起到决定性的作用。我们的目的是调查老年门诊人口的特点和结果。患者和方法:欧洲老年人介入期结局研究(POSE)是一项前瞻性多中心研究,调查9497名80岁及以上接受麻醉护理手术的患者的特征和结果。对POSE数据的二次分析调查了门诊患者与住院患者的特征、功能和认知结果以及死亡率。在基线和干预后30天,将功能状态评估为独立、部分依赖和完全依赖。认知状态通过Mini-Cog测试中回忆单词的数量(0-3)和基线和随访时的简短认知筛查来定义。结果:9497例老年患者中,计划住院7562例,计划门诊1935例。与老年住院患者相比,老年门诊患者出现的合并症和用药更少,接受小手术的频率更高。他们的基线功能状态往往更独立,并且他们保持独立的估计概率更高。门诊患者在基线和随访时比住院患者更常回忆起三个单词。估计30天生存概率95%置信区间为0.997 [0.994;计划门诊手术组为0.999],0.948 [0.942];[0.953]计划住院手术。结论:我们的研究结果表明,计划门诊患者在基线和随访时的功能和认知状况高于计划住院患者。然而,仅使用短筛选工具来评估功能和认知状态。总体而言,门诊干预与低死亡率相关。建议进一步研究,以制定评分,以方便识别适合门诊手术的患者。编辑评论:这项对欧洲前瞻性老年外科病例队列的二次分析描述了住院患者与门诊手术干预相关的病例因素。研究结果表明,在该队列中,住院或门诊手术选择与重要围手术期结局的不同程度风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信