Testing for Acetylcholine Receptor and Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase Antibodies by Fixed Cell-Based Assay in Clinical Practice: Positive Predictive Value for Myasthenia Gravis

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cathy Meng Fei Li, Michael W. Nicolle, Kamala Sangam, Liju Yang, Adrian Budhram
{"title":"Testing for Acetylcholine Receptor and Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase Antibodies by Fixed Cell-Based Assay in Clinical Practice: Positive Predictive Value for Myasthenia Gravis","authors":"Cathy Meng Fei Li,&nbsp;Michael W. Nicolle,&nbsp;Kamala Sangam,&nbsp;Liju Yang,&nbsp;Adrian Budhram","doi":"10.1111/ene.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Fixed cell-based assays (CBAs) to detect acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies (anti-AChR/MuSK) are now available, but evaluations of their diagnostic performance in clinical practice are lacking. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA for myasthenia gravis (MG), following the implementation of this assay as first-line testing at our centre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified all patients at our centre with positive anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA results between November 2021 and July 2024. Clinical information was reviewed to classify patients as having true positive or false positive antibody results. Patients with a clinical presentation compatible with MG and no more likely alternative diagnosis were classified as true positives, whereas all others were classified as false positives. Test PPV was calculated as the proportion of positives that were classified as true positives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 770 patients who underwent anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA testing, 109 (14%) had positive antibody results (Anti-AChR, 105; Anti-MuSK, 4). Among them, one patient with anti-AChR positivity was classified as a false positive (suspected thymic hyperplasia without neurologic symptoms). The remaining 108 patients were classified as true positives, resulting in a calculated PPV of 99%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found that anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA had excellent PPV for MG. Anti-AChR positivity in one asymptomatic patient with suspected thymic hyperplasia was classified as a false positive result, although the possibility that it represents a true marker of thymic pathology in a patient who may later develop MG is challenging to exclude. The high PPV reported herein supports the use of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA as first-line testing for suspected MG.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ene.70123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.70123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fixed cell-based assays (CBAs) to detect acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies (anti-AChR/MuSK) are now available, but evaluations of their diagnostic performance in clinical practice are lacking. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA for myasthenia gravis (MG), following the implementation of this assay as first-line testing at our centre.

Methods

We identified all patients at our centre with positive anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA results between November 2021 and July 2024. Clinical information was reviewed to classify patients as having true positive or false positive antibody results. Patients with a clinical presentation compatible with MG and no more likely alternative diagnosis were classified as true positives, whereas all others were classified as false positives. Test PPV was calculated as the proportion of positives that were classified as true positives.

Results

Of 770 patients who underwent anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA testing, 109 (14%) had positive antibody results (Anti-AChR, 105; Anti-MuSK, 4). Among them, one patient with anti-AChR positivity was classified as a false positive (suspected thymic hyperplasia without neurologic symptoms). The remaining 108 patients were classified as true positives, resulting in a calculated PPV of 99%.

Conclusions

We found that anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA had excellent PPV for MG. Anti-AChR positivity in one asymptomatic patient with suspected thymic hyperplasia was classified as a false positive result, although the possibility that it represents a true marker of thymic pathology in a patient who may later develop MG is challenging to exclude. The high PPV reported herein supports the use of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA as first-line testing for suspected MG.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信