Uneven Geographies of COVID-19 II: Spatialities and Economic Geographies in a Syndemic

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Tabea Bork-Hüffer, Jonathan Everts, Carsten Butsch
{"title":"Uneven Geographies of COVID-19 II: Spatialities and Economic Geographies in a Syndemic","authors":"Tabea Bork-Hüffer,&nbsp;Jonathan Everts,&nbsp;Carsten Butsch","doi":"10.1111/gec3.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This second of three review articles on the uneven geographies of COVID-19 examines geographical research on (1) spatial patterns of the pandemic's unfolding and (2) its uneven economic geographies, considering both its direct and indirect impacts—for example, those resulting from related preventive measures. In line with this article series, it (3) concludes by discussing the relevance of the reviewed research for the syndemics approach and vice versa. Research on economic effects analyzes disruptions to global value chains, industries, labor systems, and workspaces, particularly remote work. Some studies explore how the pandemic coincided with ongoing economic transitions such as economic restructuring and shrinkage, austerity politics, digitization, and automation. Studies highlight the need to contextualize spatial inequalities within historical political-economic interdependencies, power asymmetries, and structural disparities. In doing so, geographical studies add depth to syndemic analyses of structural vulnerabilities and crisis cascades, highlighting the need for spatially sensitive assessments. Still, diverging findings at national, regional, and local levels call for comparative ex-post analyses and relational methodologies able to unpack syndemic complexities. In turn, geographers can benefit from syndemic scholars' insights into disease burdens and pre-existing structural health impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51411,"journal":{"name":"Geography Compass","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography Compass","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.70025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This second of three review articles on the uneven geographies of COVID-19 examines geographical research on (1) spatial patterns of the pandemic's unfolding and (2) its uneven economic geographies, considering both its direct and indirect impacts—for example, those resulting from related preventive measures. In line with this article series, it (3) concludes by discussing the relevance of the reviewed research for the syndemics approach and vice versa. Research on economic effects analyzes disruptions to global value chains, industries, labor systems, and workspaces, particularly remote work. Some studies explore how the pandemic coincided with ongoing economic transitions such as economic restructuring and shrinkage, austerity politics, digitization, and automation. Studies highlight the need to contextualize spatial inequalities within historical political-economic interdependencies, power asymmetries, and structural disparities. In doing so, geographical studies add depth to syndemic analyses of structural vulnerabilities and crisis cascades, highlighting the need for spatially sensitive assessments. Still, diverging findings at national, regional, and local levels call for comparative ex-post analyses and relational methodologies able to unpack syndemic complexities. In turn, geographers can benefit from syndemic scholars' insights into disease burdens and pre-existing structural health impacts.

2019冠状病毒病的不均匀地理分布II:空间性和经济地理学
本文是关于COVID-19不均匀地理分布的三篇综述文章中的第二篇,考察了以下方面的地理研究:(1)大流行展开的空间格局;(2)其不均匀的经济地理分布,同时考虑了其直接和间接影响,例如,相关预防措施造成的影响。与本系列文章一致,它(3)通过讨论所审查的研究与综合症方法的相关性来结束,反之亦然。对经济影响的研究分析了对全球价值链、产业、劳动力系统和工作空间,特别是远程工作的破坏。一些研究探讨了疫情如何与经济结构调整和收缩、紧缩政治、数字化和自动化等正在进行的经济转型相吻合。研究强调需要将空间不平等置于历史政治经济相互依赖、权力不对称和结构差异的背景下。在此过程中,地理研究增加了对结构脆弱性和危机级联的综合分析的深度,突出了对空间敏感评估的必要性。尽管如此,在国家、区域和地方各级的不同调查结果要求进行比较的事后分析和关系方法,以便能够解开疾病的复杂性。反过来,地理学家可以从学术学者对疾病负担和先前存在的结构性健康影响的见解中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography Compass
Geography Compass GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Geography Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Geography Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Geography Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信