Can Deep Learning Models Enhance the Accuracy of Agricultural Price Forecasting? Insights From India

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Ranjit Kumar Paul, Md Yeasin, C. Tamilselvi, A. K. Paul, Purushottam Sharma, Pratap S. Birthal
{"title":"Can Deep Learning Models Enhance the Accuracy of Agricultural Price Forecasting? Insights From India","authors":"Ranjit Kumar Paul,&nbsp;Md Yeasin,&nbsp;C. Tamilselvi,&nbsp;A. K. Paul,&nbsp;Purushottam Sharma,&nbsp;Pratap S. Birthal","doi":"10.1002/isaf.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Forecasting agricultural commodity prices has been a long-standing challenge for researchers and policymakers. The diverse behaviors exhibited by price of different commodities, ranging from the high volatility, nonlinearity, and complexity of vegetables to the lower volatility and linear patterns of cereals. This different pattern necessitates the use of data-driven models to more precisely capture this complex behavior. This study aims to examine the efficiency of deep learning models in handling various types of price datasets. Three deep learning models, namely, gated recurrent unit (GRU), long short-term memory (LSTM), and recurrent neural network (RNN), are employed and compared against benchmark models including random walk with drift, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), artificial neural networks (ANN), and support vector regression (SVR). The monthly wholesale price data during January 2010 to December 2022 for 19 agricultural commodities across 143 markets in India have been utilized to illustrate the performance of models. Empirical comparison has been carried out by using different accuracy measures. The predictive accuracy is the highest for less-volatile crops such as cereals and pulses, while it is comparatively lower for crops with high-volatility like vegetables. The significant difference in prediction accuracy of different models has also been investigated with the help of Diebold Mariano test and its multivariate version. The study concluded that deep learning techniques outperformed machine learning and stochastic models across a wide range of commodities.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53473,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/isaf.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forecasting agricultural commodity prices has been a long-standing challenge for researchers and policymakers. The diverse behaviors exhibited by price of different commodities, ranging from the high volatility, nonlinearity, and complexity of vegetables to the lower volatility and linear patterns of cereals. This different pattern necessitates the use of data-driven models to more precisely capture this complex behavior. This study aims to examine the efficiency of deep learning models in handling various types of price datasets. Three deep learning models, namely, gated recurrent unit (GRU), long short-term memory (LSTM), and recurrent neural network (RNN), are employed and compared against benchmark models including random walk with drift, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), artificial neural networks (ANN), and support vector regression (SVR). The monthly wholesale price data during January 2010 to December 2022 for 19 agricultural commodities across 143 markets in India have been utilized to illustrate the performance of models. Empirical comparison has been carried out by using different accuracy measures. The predictive accuracy is the highest for less-volatile crops such as cereals and pulses, while it is comparatively lower for crops with high-volatility like vegetables. The significant difference in prediction accuracy of different models has also been investigated with the help of Diebold Mariano test and its multivariate version. The study concluded that deep learning techniques outperformed machine learning and stochastic models across a wide range of commodities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management is a quarterly international journal which publishes original, high quality material dealing with all aspects of intelligent systems as they relate to the fields of accounting, economics, finance, marketing and management. In addition, the journal also is concerned with related emerging technologies, including big data, business intelligence, social media and other technologies. It encourages the development of novel technologies, and the embedding of new and existing technologies into applications of real, practical value. Therefore, implementation issues are of as much concern as development issues. The journal is designed to appeal to academics in the intelligent systems, emerging technologies and business fields, as well as to advanced practitioners who wish to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, or economy of their working practices. A special feature of the journal is the use of two groups of reviewers, those who specialize in intelligent systems work, and also those who specialize in applications areas. Reviewers are asked to address issues of originality and actual or potential impact on research, teaching, or practice in the accounting, finance, or management fields. Authors working on conceptual developments or on laboratory-based explorations of data sets therefore need to address the issue of potential impact at some level in submissions to the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信