Patient and physician perceptions regarding treatment expectations and symptomatology in polycythemia vera: Insights from the Landmark 2.0 global health survey
Claire N. Harrison, David M. Ross, Laura Maria Fogliatto, Lynda Foltz, Lambert Busque, Zhijian Xiao, Florian H. Heidel, Michael Koehler, Giuseppe A. Palumbo, Massimo Breccia, Norio Komatsu, Keita Kirito, Blanca Xicoy Cirici, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez, Alicia Rovo, Cheryl Petruk, Catalin Bobirca, Laura Mirams, Abigail McMillan, Gavin Harper, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian
{"title":"Patient and physician perceptions regarding treatment expectations and symptomatology in polycythemia vera: Insights from the Landmark 2.0 global health survey","authors":"Claire N. Harrison, David M. Ross, Laura Maria Fogliatto, Lynda Foltz, Lambert Busque, Zhijian Xiao, Florian H. Heidel, Michael Koehler, Giuseppe A. Palumbo, Massimo Breccia, Norio Komatsu, Keita Kirito, Blanca Xicoy Cirici, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez, Alicia Rovo, Cheryl Petruk, Catalin Bobirca, Laura Mirams, Abigail McMillan, Gavin Harper, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with a high symptom and psychological burden, resulting in decreased quality of life (QoL). Patients with PV have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications, making regular monitoring crucial. The Landmark 2.0 survey was conducted worldwide among patients with PV and their treating physicians to identify any potential gaps in perceptions regarding PV management. Data were collected between April 2021 and April 2022 from physicians and patients across 11 countries. Overall, 133 physicians and 274 patients with PV participated in the survey. There were discrepancies between physicians and patients in reporting whether symptom assessments and basic CV assessments were conducted during routine visits (83% vs. 68% and 64% vs. 55%, respectively). Emotional assessments were not performed routinely (reported by 36% of physicians and 34% of patients). Patients attributed the highest impact on QoL to physical symptoms (67%); however, physicians were less likely to report highly prevalent symptoms such as bruising, difficulty sleeping, inactivity, and depression among the most common symptoms. While both physicians and patients aimed for symptom improvement, their treatment goals differed: physicians focused on managing hematocrit, preventing thrombotic events, and reducing spleen size, while patients focused on slowing down disease progression. Patient satisfaction with treatment was generally high but decreased in later therapy stages. Overall, these data underscore the disparity in patient–physician perceptions of PV management and treatment expectations, showing the gaps in communication and the need for greater patient education, as well as highlighting areas for potential improvement in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HemaSphere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hem3.70106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with a high symptom and psychological burden, resulting in decreased quality of life (QoL). Patients with PV have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications, making regular monitoring crucial. The Landmark 2.0 survey was conducted worldwide among patients with PV and their treating physicians to identify any potential gaps in perceptions regarding PV management. Data were collected between April 2021 and April 2022 from physicians and patients across 11 countries. Overall, 133 physicians and 274 patients with PV participated in the survey. There were discrepancies between physicians and patients in reporting whether symptom assessments and basic CV assessments were conducted during routine visits (83% vs. 68% and 64% vs. 55%, respectively). Emotional assessments were not performed routinely (reported by 36% of physicians and 34% of patients). Patients attributed the highest impact on QoL to physical symptoms (67%); however, physicians were less likely to report highly prevalent symptoms such as bruising, difficulty sleeping, inactivity, and depression among the most common symptoms. While both physicians and patients aimed for symptom improvement, their treatment goals differed: physicians focused on managing hematocrit, preventing thrombotic events, and reducing spleen size, while patients focused on slowing down disease progression. Patient satisfaction with treatment was generally high but decreased in later therapy stages. Overall, these data underscore the disparity in patient–physician perceptions of PV management and treatment expectations, showing the gaps in communication and the need for greater patient education, as well as highlighting areas for potential improvement in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
HemaSphere, as a publication, is dedicated to disseminating the outcomes of profoundly pertinent basic, translational, and clinical research endeavors within the field of hematology. The journal actively seeks robust studies that unveil novel discoveries with significant ramifications for hematology.
In addition to original research, HemaSphere features review articles and guideline articles that furnish lucid synopses and discussions of emerging developments, along with recommendations for patient care.
Positioned as the foremost resource in hematology, HemaSphere augments its offerings with specialized sections like HemaTopics and HemaPolicy. These segments engender insightful dialogues covering a spectrum of hematology-related topics, including digestible summaries of pivotal articles, updates on new therapies, deliberations on European policy matters, and other noteworthy news items within the field. Steering the course of HemaSphere are Editor in Chief Jan Cools and Deputy Editor in Chief Claire Harrison, alongside the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board comprising international luminaries in both research and clinical realms, each representing diverse areas of hematologic expertise.