A new scoring system to predict the risk of late recurrence in extended follow-up after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: APCEL score

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Taner Ulus MD, Ahmet Şekip Ahmadi MD, Ertuğrul Çolak MD
{"title":"A new scoring system to predict the risk of late recurrence in extended follow-up after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: APCEL score","authors":"Taner Ulus MD,&nbsp;Ahmet Şekip Ahmadi MD,&nbsp;Ertuğrul Çolak MD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In studies where risk scores used to determine the risk of late recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation were defined, significant differences were observed in terms of parameters such as post-procedural follow-up time, pre-procedural AF time, energy sources used for ablation, and cut-off values of left atrium (LA) diameter. Considering all these factors, we aimed to develop a new recurrence risk score for prolonged follow-up after AF ablation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 206 patients who underwent index AF catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF. Independent predictors of late recurrence were identified at a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 21–57), and a risk score was created. The predictive ability of this score for late recurrence was compared with that of other risk scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Independent predictors of late recurrence development included pre-ablation AF duration &gt;19 months, persistent AF, early recurrence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and LA volume index &gt;31 mL/m<sup>2</sup>. The APCEL risk score, derived from these factors (Early recurrence: 3 points, AF duration &gt;19 months: 2 points, others: 1 point), demonstrated good predictive performance for late recurrence at 6th [AUC: 0.940, 95% CI: 0.896–0.983], 12th [AUC: 0.865, 95% CI: 0.796–0.932], 24th [AUC: 0.814, 95% CI: 0.743–0.885], and 36th months [AUC: 0.798, 95% CI: 0.726–0.868].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The APCEL score, calculated at the end of the blanking period for patients who underwent AF ablation, can effectively identify those at high risk of late recurrence during extended follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In studies where risk scores used to determine the risk of late recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation were defined, significant differences were observed in terms of parameters such as post-procedural follow-up time, pre-procedural AF time, energy sources used for ablation, and cut-off values of left atrium (LA) diameter. Considering all these factors, we aimed to develop a new recurrence risk score for prolonged follow-up after AF ablation.

Methods

The study included 206 patients who underwent index AF catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF. Independent predictors of late recurrence were identified at a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 21–57), and a risk score was created. The predictive ability of this score for late recurrence was compared with that of other risk scores.

Results

Independent predictors of late recurrence development included pre-ablation AF duration >19 months, persistent AF, early recurrence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and LA volume index >31 mL/m2. The APCEL risk score, derived from these factors (Early recurrence: 3 points, AF duration >19 months: 2 points, others: 1 point), demonstrated good predictive performance for late recurrence at 6th [AUC: 0.940, 95% CI: 0.896–0.983], 12th [AUC: 0.865, 95% CI: 0.796–0.932], 24th [AUC: 0.814, 95% CI: 0.743–0.885], and 36th months [AUC: 0.798, 95% CI: 0.726–0.868].

Conclusions

The APCEL score, calculated at the end of the blanking period for patients who underwent AF ablation, can effectively identify those at high risk of late recurrence during extended follow-up.

Abstract Image

预测房颤导管消融后延长随访晚期复发风险的新评分系统:APCEL评分
在一些研究中,风险评分用于确定房颤(AF)导管消融后晚期复发的风险,在术后随访时间、术前房颤时间、消融能量来源和左心房直径临界值等参数方面观察到显著差异。考虑到所有这些因素,我们的目标是为房颤消融后的长期随访建立一个新的复发风险评分。方法:研究纳入206例因阵发性或持续性房颤而接受房颤导管消融的患者。在中位随访40个月(范围:21-57)时确定晚期复发的独立预测因素,并建立风险评分。将该评分对晚期复发的预测能力与其他风险评分进行比较。结果消融前房颤持续时间19个月、房颤持续性、早期复发、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、LA容积指数31 mL/m2为晚期复发的独立预测因素。由这些因素得出的APCEL风险评分(早期复发:3分,AF持续时间和19个月:2分,其他:1分)在第6个月[AUC: 0.940, 95% CI: 0.896-0.983],第12个月[AUC: 0.865, 95% CI: 0.796-0.932],第24个月[AUC: 0.814, 95% CI: 0.743-0.885]和第36个月[AUC: 0.798, 95% CI: 0.726-0.868]显示出良好的预测晚期复发的效果。结论对房颤消融患者在空白期结束时计算APCEL评分,可在延长随访期间有效识别晚期复发高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信