Design and implementation of an automated patient-care dashboard to provide individualized patient care data and quality metrics to emergency medicine residents

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Danielle T. Miller MD, MEd, Sean S. Michael MD, MBA, Sarah H. Michael DO, Kelly Bookman MD, Cody Brevik MD, William Dewispelaere MD, Christopher Johns MD, Bonnie Kaplan MD, Dong Nguyen, Daniel Owens MD, Gannon Sungar DO, John Kendall MD
{"title":"Design and implementation of an automated patient-care dashboard to provide individualized patient care data and quality metrics to emergency medicine residents","authors":"Danielle T. Miller MD, MEd,&nbsp;Sean S. Michael MD, MBA,&nbsp;Sarah H. Michael DO,&nbsp;Kelly Bookman MD,&nbsp;Cody Brevik MD,&nbsp;William Dewispelaere MD,&nbsp;Christopher Johns MD,&nbsp;Bonnie Kaplan MD,&nbsp;Dong Nguyen,&nbsp;Daniel Owens MD,&nbsp;Gannon Sungar DO,&nbsp;John Kendall MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The emergency department (ED) is a high-stakes training environment for emergency medicine (EM) residents and residents' ability to reflect and self-evaluate patient care is of critical importance. Patient care dashboards have been shown to increase adherence to quality guidelines and improve patient outcomes. The objectives of this study were: (1) to create a comprehensive list of evidence-based, psychologically safe patient care and quality metrics to include in a patient care dashboard for EM residents; (2) to design an EM patient care residency dashboard in a secure, cloud-based environment integrated with the electronic health record (EHR); and (3) to pilot the usability and acceptability of the dashboard among EM residents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We created a list of potential EM resident patient care metrics using ACGME Emergency Medicine Defined Key Index Procedure Minimums, leading EM quality indicators, and current EM dashboard literature. We surveyed PGY-1 to -4 EM residents at a single residency program for their recommendations about inclusion, exclusion, and the psychological safety of each metric. We then developed a dashboard utilizing Power BI software integrated with Epic EHR. After development, we conducted a 2-month pilot evaluation for usability and acceptability among EM residents utilizing a mixed-methods approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 41 metrics within five domains (productivity metrics, patient safety and leading quality indicators, key procedures, complex/high-acuity cases, and uncertain diagnosis) to consider for inclusion in the dashboard. Residents (<i>n</i> = 32/68; 47% survey completion rate) recommended inclusion of 33 metrics; among these, three were identified as moderate–high psychological risk (ED length of stay, patients per hour, death within 24 h) whereas the rest were considered low psychological risk. Based on these survey results, we created an EM resident patient dashboard using Microsoft Power BI. Over a 2-month pilot period with 16 residents, user data showed a change between each resident's prior patient care review practices and review practices when using a dashboard; specifically, there were notable variations in frequency of use, time spent per review session, number of patients reviewed per session, and data categories reviewed. Eleven of 16 residents completed the technology usability and acceptability survey, with general acceptability and few concerns on usability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our dashboard provides individualized patient care data to EM residents related to productivity, patient safety and quality, key procedures, complex/high-acuity cases, and uncertain diagnoses. A pilot group of EM residents found the dashboard acceptable and useable. Continued research is needed to explore ideal implementation and integration of patient care dashboards in residency training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The emergency department (ED) is a high-stakes training environment for emergency medicine (EM) residents and residents' ability to reflect and self-evaluate patient care is of critical importance. Patient care dashboards have been shown to increase adherence to quality guidelines and improve patient outcomes. The objectives of this study were: (1) to create a comprehensive list of evidence-based, psychologically safe patient care and quality metrics to include in a patient care dashboard for EM residents; (2) to design an EM patient care residency dashboard in a secure, cloud-based environment integrated with the electronic health record (EHR); and (3) to pilot the usability and acceptability of the dashboard among EM residents.

Methods

We created a list of potential EM resident patient care metrics using ACGME Emergency Medicine Defined Key Index Procedure Minimums, leading EM quality indicators, and current EM dashboard literature. We surveyed PGY-1 to -4 EM residents at a single residency program for their recommendations about inclusion, exclusion, and the psychological safety of each metric. We then developed a dashboard utilizing Power BI software integrated with Epic EHR. After development, we conducted a 2-month pilot evaluation for usability and acceptability among EM residents utilizing a mixed-methods approach.

Results

We identified 41 metrics within five domains (productivity metrics, patient safety and leading quality indicators, key procedures, complex/high-acuity cases, and uncertain diagnosis) to consider for inclusion in the dashboard. Residents (n = 32/68; 47% survey completion rate) recommended inclusion of 33 metrics; among these, three were identified as moderate–high psychological risk (ED length of stay, patients per hour, death within 24 h) whereas the rest were considered low psychological risk. Based on these survey results, we created an EM resident patient dashboard using Microsoft Power BI. Over a 2-month pilot period with 16 residents, user data showed a change between each resident's prior patient care review practices and review practices when using a dashboard; specifically, there were notable variations in frequency of use, time spent per review session, number of patients reviewed per session, and data categories reviewed. Eleven of 16 residents completed the technology usability and acceptability survey, with general acceptability and few concerns on usability.

Conclusions

Our dashboard provides individualized patient care data to EM residents related to productivity, patient safety and quality, key procedures, complex/high-acuity cases, and uncertain diagnoses. A pilot group of EM residents found the dashboard acceptable and useable. Continued research is needed to explore ideal implementation and integration of patient care dashboards in residency training.

背景急诊科(ED)是急诊医学(EM)住院医师的重要培训环境,住院医师反思和自我评估患者护理的能力至关重要。患者护理仪表板已被证明可提高对质量方针的遵守程度并改善患者预后。本研究的目标是(1)创建一份全面的循证、心理安全的患者护理和质量指标清单,将其纳入急诊科住院医师患者护理仪表板中;(2)在与电子病历(EHR)集成的安全云环境中设计急诊科住院医师患者护理仪表板;(3)在急诊科住院医师中试用仪表板的可用性和可接受性。 方法 我们利用 ACGME 急诊医学定义的关键指标程序最小值、领先的急诊医学质量指标以及当前的急诊医学仪表板文献,创建了一份潜在的急诊医学住院医师患者护理指标清单。我们对一个住院医师培训项目中的 PGY-1 至 -4 级急诊科住院医师进行了调查,以了解他们对每项指标的纳入、排除和心理安全方面的建议。然后,我们利用与 Epic EHR 集成的 Power BI 软件开发了一个仪表盘。开发完成后,我们采用混合方法对急诊科住院医师的可用性和可接受性进行了为期 2 个月的试点评估。 结果 我们确定了五个领域(生产率指标、患者安全和主要质量指标、关键程序、复杂/高危病例和不确定诊断)中的 41 个指标,并考虑将其纳入仪表板。住院医师(n = 32/68;调查完成率 47%)建议纳入 33 项指标;其中,三项指标被确定为中度-高度心理风险(急诊室住院时间、每小时患者人数、24 小时内死亡人数),而其余指标被认为是低心理风险指标。根据这些调查结果,我们使用 Microsoft Power BI 创建了急诊科住院患者仪表板。在对 16 名住院医师进行为期 2 个月的试点期间,用户数据显示,每位住院医师之前的患者护理回顾实践与使用仪表板时的回顾实践之间存在变化;具体而言,在使用频率、每次回顾所花费的时间、每次回顾的患者数量以及回顾的数据类别方面存在明显差异。16 名住院医师中有 11 人完成了技术可用性和可接受性调查,总体上可以接受,很少有人对可用性表示担忧。 结论 我们的仪表板为急诊科住院医师提供了与工作效率、患者安全和质量、关键程序、复杂/高危病例以及不确定诊断相关的个性化患者护理数据。一组试点的急诊科住院医师认为该仪表板可接受且可用。需要继续开展研究,探索在住院医师培训中理想地实施和整合病人护理仪表板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信