Slopes of Lunar Crater Size-Frequency Distributions on Exterior Impact Melt Deposits of Young Craters

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
A. Oetting, W. Iqbal, N. Schmedemann, G. Michael, H. Hiesinger, C. H. van der Bogert, T. Heyer
{"title":"Slopes of Lunar Crater Size-Frequency Distributions on Exterior Impact Melt Deposits of Young Craters","authors":"A. Oetting,&nbsp;W. Iqbal,&nbsp;N. Schmedemann,&nbsp;G. Michael,&nbsp;H. Hiesinger,&nbsp;C. H. van der Bogert,&nbsp;T. Heyer","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lunar impact craters can be used as a tool to derive information about the timing and sequence of the emplacement of geologic units and surface processes on the Moon. The production function (PF) derived from crater size-frequency distribution (CSFD) measurements is an essential component in determining the model age of a geologic surface. The PFs of Neukum (1983) and Neukum et al. (2001), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1035-0_3 are defined only over a crater diameter range between 10 m and 300 km and are among the most frequently used PFs. However, a potential extension of the valid crater diameter range to smaller craters may be possible due to the availability of high-resolution image data, and a larger number of small craters could reduce the statistical errors in age determinations. To evaluate whether CSFD measurements with craters ≤10 m are suitable for inclusion in a PF, we complement the investigation of ejecta blankets (Oetting et al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023je007816) by analyzing the CSFD slopes of small craters formed on impact melt deposits of young Copernican-aged craters Tharp, Korolev Z, Thales, and Glushko. The resulting CSFD slopes are slightly steeper for craters between 10 and 20 m than the proposed cumulative −3 slopes by Neukum (1983) and Neukum et al. (2001), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1035-0_3. The CSFD slope for craters ≤10 m is shallower than −3. In this study, the CSFD slopes are derived from unbinned data, but we present our CSFD measurements in both unbinned and binned form. Our results indicate that small crater diameters (≤10 m) can be included for extending a PF.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008589","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lunar impact craters can be used as a tool to derive information about the timing and sequence of the emplacement of geologic units and surface processes on the Moon. The production function (PF) derived from crater size-frequency distribution (CSFD) measurements is an essential component in determining the model age of a geologic surface. The PFs of Neukum (1983) and Neukum et al. (2001), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1035-0_3 are defined only over a crater diameter range between 10 m and 300 km and are among the most frequently used PFs. However, a potential extension of the valid crater diameter range to smaller craters may be possible due to the availability of high-resolution image data, and a larger number of small craters could reduce the statistical errors in age determinations. To evaluate whether CSFD measurements with craters ≤10 m are suitable for inclusion in a PF, we complement the investigation of ejecta blankets (Oetting et al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023je007816) by analyzing the CSFD slopes of small craters formed on impact melt deposits of young Copernican-aged craters Tharp, Korolev Z, Thales, and Glushko. The resulting CSFD slopes are slightly steeper for craters between 10 and 20 m than the proposed cumulative −3 slopes by Neukum (1983) and Neukum et al. (2001), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1035-0_3. The CSFD slope for craters ≤10 m is shallower than −3. In this study, the CSFD slopes are derived from unbinned data, but we present our CSFD measurements in both unbinned and binned form. Our results indicate that small crater diameters (≤10 m) can be included for extending a PF.

Abstract Image

月球陨坑尺寸-频率分布在年轻陨坑外撞击熔体沉积物上的斜率
月球撞击坑可以作为一种工具,用来获得有关地质单元就位的时间和顺序以及月球表面过程的信息。由陨石坑尺寸-频率分布(CSFD)测量得到的生产函数(PF)是确定地质表面模型年龄的重要组成部分。Neukum(1983)和Neukum et al. (2001), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1035-0_3的PFs仅在陨石坑直径10米至300公里范围内定义,是最常用的PFs之一。然而,由于高分辨率图像数据的可用性,可能有可能将有效陨石坑直径范围扩展到较小的陨石坑,并且大量的小陨石坑可以减少年龄确定的统计误差。为了评估陨石坑≤10 m的CSFD测量是否适合包含在PF中,我们通过分析年轻的哥白尼时代的陨石坑Tharp, Korolev Z, Thales和Glushko的撞击熔体沉积物上形成的小陨石坑的CSFD斜率来补充对喷射毯的研究(oettting等人,2023,https://doi.org/10.1029/2023je007816)。与Neukum(1983)和Neukum等人(2001)提出的累积- 3坡度相比,所得的CSFD坡度在10至20米之间的陨石坑略陡,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1035-0_3。小于10 m陨石坑的CSFD斜率小于−3。在本研究中,CSFD斜率是由非分类数据导出的,但我们以非分类和分类两种形式呈现我们的CSFD测量值。我们的结果表明,小陨石坑直径(≤10 m)可以用于扩展PF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信