Squishy and Crunchy Invasive Invertebrates: Environmental DNA Is Not Shed Equally

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Emily Rose Lancaster, Erin Katherine Grey, Damian Coman Brady, Markus Frederich
{"title":"Squishy and Crunchy Invasive Invertebrates: Environmental DNA Is Not Shed Equally","authors":"Emily Rose Lancaster,&nbsp;Erin Katherine Grey,&nbsp;Damian Coman Brady,&nbsp;Markus Frederich","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection can be a powerful approach to detect organisms in low abundance and can be crucial for early invasive species detection. Despite its potential, the body plan diversity of invertebrates can pose significant challenges, notably arthropods with exoskeletons that may have low eDNA shedding rates. In this study, we validated nine single-species quantitative PCR assays targeting invasive and nuisance species representing various body plans in the Gulf of Maine, an area of rapid ocean warming. Combining visual surveys and molecular analyses in a two-year eDNA time series, we successfully detected eight of nine target species with qPCR. Of the soft-bodied, “squishy” species, four of five exhibited eDNA detection consistent with visual abundances. Of species with an exoskeleton or shell (crunchy), three of four species were not detected consistently in accordance with visual abundance. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of eDNA for early invasive species detection but emphasize the need for long-term field and laboratory validation, informed by species' bauplan. It is imperative to recognize that while eDNA is a valuable tool, its applicability varies across taxa. Therefore, interpreting eDNA results requires careful consideration of its limitations and the specific characteristics of the target organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection can be a powerful approach to detect organisms in low abundance and can be crucial for early invasive species detection. Despite its potential, the body plan diversity of invertebrates can pose significant challenges, notably arthropods with exoskeletons that may have low eDNA shedding rates. In this study, we validated nine single-species quantitative PCR assays targeting invasive and nuisance species representing various body plans in the Gulf of Maine, an area of rapid ocean warming. Combining visual surveys and molecular analyses in a two-year eDNA time series, we successfully detected eight of nine target species with qPCR. Of the soft-bodied, “squishy” species, four of five exhibited eDNA detection consistent with visual abundances. Of species with an exoskeleton or shell (crunchy), three of four species were not detected consistently in accordance with visual abundance. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of eDNA for early invasive species detection but emphasize the need for long-term field and laboratory validation, informed by species' bauplan. It is imperative to recognize that while eDNA is a valuable tool, its applicability varies across taxa. Therefore, interpreting eDNA results requires careful consideration of its limitations and the specific characteristics of the target organisms.

Abstract Image

松软和松脆的入侵无脊椎动物:环境 DNA 并非一成不变
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信