Environmental Matrices Need Consideration: Insights From Water and Biofilm Environmental DNA for Multi-Taxonomic Biomonitoring

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Paula Gauvin, Isabelle Domaizon, Agnes Bouchez, Frédéric Rimet
{"title":"Environmental Matrices Need Consideration: Insights From Water and Biofilm Environmental DNA for Multi-Taxonomic Biomonitoring","authors":"Paula Gauvin,&nbsp;Isabelle Domaizon,&nbsp;Agnes Bouchez,&nbsp;Frédéric Rimet","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) is revolutionizing biodiversity monitoring, offering a unique approach to assess multi-taxonomic diversity with various applications related to evaluation, protection, and restoration of aquatic ecosystems. However, there is still a lack of sufficient studies to assess the complementarity of various environmental matrices and their contribution to enhancing biodiversity detection. This study evaluates the impact of eDNA sampling in different matrices to measure biodiversity of different taxonomic groups. We set up a year-long eDNA sampling of water and biofilm matrices in a large lake littoral zone (Lake Geneva), focusing on microalgae, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. We first assessed primer specificity, which was high for microalgae (23S) and fish (12S) but was lower for macroinvertebrates (COI). We then evaluated the complementarity of eDNA signals in water and biofilms. For microalgae, communities from biofilm and water were highly different: water eDNA almost exclusively detected planktonic taxa while biofilm eDNA detected predominantly benthic taxa. For macroinvertebrates, communities in water and biofilms were also different, and biofilm eDNA could detect mostly Chironomidae. Finally, for fish, eDNA of both matrices enabled us to detect similar communities even if a few rare species were detected only in water. In the framework of the assessment of ecosystem quality or restoration actions success, we recommend diversifying matrices to collect eDNA to capture a complete picture of microalgae and macroinvertebrate communities. For fish, it is possible to sample water or biofilms, keeping in mind that water has become a standard practice for fish eDNA sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is revolutionizing biodiversity monitoring, offering a unique approach to assess multi-taxonomic diversity with various applications related to evaluation, protection, and restoration of aquatic ecosystems. However, there is still a lack of sufficient studies to assess the complementarity of various environmental matrices and their contribution to enhancing biodiversity detection. This study evaluates the impact of eDNA sampling in different matrices to measure biodiversity of different taxonomic groups. We set up a year-long eDNA sampling of water and biofilm matrices in a large lake littoral zone (Lake Geneva), focusing on microalgae, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. We first assessed primer specificity, which was high for microalgae (23S) and fish (12S) but was lower for macroinvertebrates (COI). We then evaluated the complementarity of eDNA signals in water and biofilms. For microalgae, communities from biofilm and water were highly different: water eDNA almost exclusively detected planktonic taxa while biofilm eDNA detected predominantly benthic taxa. For macroinvertebrates, communities in water and biofilms were also different, and biofilm eDNA could detect mostly Chironomidae. Finally, for fish, eDNA of both matrices enabled us to detect similar communities even if a few rare species were detected only in water. In the framework of the assessment of ecosystem quality or restoration actions success, we recommend diversifying matrices to collect eDNA to capture a complete picture of microalgae and macroinvertebrate communities. For fish, it is possible to sample water or biofilms, keeping in mind that water has become a standard practice for fish eDNA sampling.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信