Environmental Matrices Need Consideration: Insights From Water and Biofilm Environmental DNA for Multi-Taxonomic Biomonitoring

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Paula Gauvin, Isabelle Domaizon, Agnes Bouchez, Frédéric Rimet
{"title":"Environmental Matrices Need Consideration: Insights From Water and Biofilm Environmental DNA for Multi-Taxonomic Biomonitoring","authors":"Paula Gauvin,&nbsp;Isabelle Domaizon,&nbsp;Agnes Bouchez,&nbsp;Frédéric Rimet","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) is revolutionizing biodiversity monitoring, offering a unique approach to assess multi-taxonomic diversity with various applications related to evaluation, protection, and restoration of aquatic ecosystems. However, there is still a lack of sufficient studies to assess the complementarity of various environmental matrices and their contribution to enhancing biodiversity detection. This study evaluates the impact of eDNA sampling in different matrices to measure biodiversity of different taxonomic groups. We set up a year-long eDNA sampling of water and biofilm matrices in a large lake littoral zone (Lake Geneva), focusing on microalgae, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. We first assessed primer specificity, which was high for microalgae (23S) and fish (12S) but was lower for macroinvertebrates (COI). We then evaluated the complementarity of eDNA signals in water and biofilms. For microalgae, communities from biofilm and water were highly different: water eDNA almost exclusively detected planktonic taxa while biofilm eDNA detected predominantly benthic taxa. For macroinvertebrates, communities in water and biofilms were also different, and biofilm eDNA could detect mostly Chironomidae. Finally, for fish, eDNA of both matrices enabled us to detect similar communities even if a few rare species were detected only in water. In the framework of the assessment of ecosystem quality or restoration actions success, we recommend diversifying matrices to collect eDNA to capture a complete picture of microalgae and macroinvertebrate communities. For fish, it is possible to sample water or biofilms, keeping in mind that water has become a standard practice for fish eDNA sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is revolutionizing biodiversity monitoring, offering a unique approach to assess multi-taxonomic diversity with various applications related to evaluation, protection, and restoration of aquatic ecosystems. However, there is still a lack of sufficient studies to assess the complementarity of various environmental matrices and their contribution to enhancing biodiversity detection. This study evaluates the impact of eDNA sampling in different matrices to measure biodiversity of different taxonomic groups. We set up a year-long eDNA sampling of water and biofilm matrices in a large lake littoral zone (Lake Geneva), focusing on microalgae, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. We first assessed primer specificity, which was high for microalgae (23S) and fish (12S) but was lower for macroinvertebrates (COI). We then evaluated the complementarity of eDNA signals in water and biofilms. For microalgae, communities from biofilm and water were highly different: water eDNA almost exclusively detected planktonic taxa while biofilm eDNA detected predominantly benthic taxa. For macroinvertebrates, communities in water and biofilms were also different, and biofilm eDNA could detect mostly Chironomidae. Finally, for fish, eDNA of both matrices enabled us to detect similar communities even if a few rare species were detected only in water. In the framework of the assessment of ecosystem quality or restoration actions success, we recommend diversifying matrices to collect eDNA to capture a complete picture of microalgae and macroinvertebrate communities. For fish, it is possible to sample water or biofilms, keeping in mind that water has become a standard practice for fish eDNA sampling.

Abstract Image

环境基质需要考虑:从水和生物膜环境DNA对多分类生物监测的见解
环境DNA (Environmental DNA, eDNA)是一种革命性的生物多样性监测方法,为水生生态系统的评价、保护和恢复提供了一种独特的多分类多样性评估方法。然而,目前还缺乏足够的研究来评估各种环境基质的互补性及其对加强生物多样性检测的贡献。本研究评估了eDNA取样在不同基质下测量不同分类类群生物多样性的影响。我们在日内瓦湖的一个大型湖滨带对水和生物膜基质进行了为期一年的eDNA采样,重点是微藻、底栖大型无脊椎动物和鱼类。我们首先评估了引物特异性,微藻(23S)和鱼类(12S)的引物特异性很高,但大型无脊椎动物(COI)的引物特异性较低。然后我们评估了eDNA信号在水和生物膜中的互补性。对于微藻,来自生物膜和水的群落差异很大:水中eDNA几乎只检测浮游类群,而生物膜eDNA主要检测底栖类群。对于大型无脊椎动物,水体和生物膜中的群落也存在差异,生物膜eDNA可以检测到大部分手摇蝇科。最后,对于鱼类来说,两种基质的eDNA使我们能够检测到相似的群落,即使只在水中检测到少数稀有物种。在评估生态系统质量或恢复行动成功的框架下,我们建议采用多样化的基质来收集eDNA,以获得微藻和大型无脊椎动物群落的完整图像。对于鱼类,可以对水或生物膜进行取样,请记住,水已成为鱼类eDNA取样的标准做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信