Donald L. Gilbert, Deana Crocetti, Paul S. Horn, Steve W. Wu, David A. Huddleston, Jacqueline M. Ehrman, Karlee Y. Migneault, Stewart H. Mostofsky
{"title":"In children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, less task-related up-modulation of motor cortex during response inhibition","authors":"Donald L. Gilbert, Deana Crocetti, Paul S. Horn, Steve W. Wu, David A. Huddleston, Jacqueline M. Ehrman, Karlee Y. Migneault, Stewart H. Mostofsky","doi":"10.1002/cns3.20101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to identify a quantitative, brain-based measure reflecting impaired response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this cross-sectional study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evoke potentials in hand muscle during both a simple reaction time and a response inhibition task in 8-to-12-year-old children, 41 with ADHD (42% girls, 76% white, mean age 10.3 years) and 38 typically developing controls (53% girls, 74% white, mean age 9.8 years). We used mixed-model linear regressions of evoked potential amplitudes to compare motor cortex excitability at (1) task-onset (“START”: 550 ms prior to action); (2) preparing-to-go (“GO”: 150 ms prior to action); and (3) selecting-to-stop (“STOP”: 150 ms after stop cue). We hypothesized that task-related up-modulation of motor cortex excitability (motor evoked potential amplitudes) would depend both on task (STOP > GO > START) and on diagnosis (controls > patients).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Motor cortex up-modulation was significantly greater for STOP trials than during GO or START. Children with ADHD had both worse response inhibition performance (longer stop-signal reaction times) and significantly less task effect on motor cortex up-modulation. The largest diagnostic difference in motor cortex activation occurred during STOP trials. Reduced up-modulation during stopping was also associated with higher parent-rated symptom severity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that motor cortex up-modulation of excitability, assessed indirectly by TMS motor evoked potentials, reflects the cognitive load during response inhibition tasks and may be a quantitative, brain-based indicator of impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72232,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","volume":"3 1","pages":"26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cns3.20101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cns3.20101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to identify a quantitative, brain-based measure reflecting impaired response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evoke potentials in hand muscle during both a simple reaction time and a response inhibition task in 8-to-12-year-old children, 41 with ADHD (42% girls, 76% white, mean age 10.3 years) and 38 typically developing controls (53% girls, 74% white, mean age 9.8 years). We used mixed-model linear regressions of evoked potential amplitudes to compare motor cortex excitability at (1) task-onset (“START”: 550 ms prior to action); (2) preparing-to-go (“GO”: 150 ms prior to action); and (3) selecting-to-stop (“STOP”: 150 ms after stop cue). We hypothesized that task-related up-modulation of motor cortex excitability (motor evoked potential amplitudes) would depend both on task (STOP > GO > START) and on diagnosis (controls > patients).
Results
Motor cortex up-modulation was significantly greater for STOP trials than during GO or START. Children with ADHD had both worse response inhibition performance (longer stop-signal reaction times) and significantly less task effect on motor cortex up-modulation. The largest diagnostic difference in motor cortex activation occurred during STOP trials. Reduced up-modulation during stopping was also associated with higher parent-rated symptom severity.
Interpretation
Our findings suggest that motor cortex up-modulation of excitability, assessed indirectly by TMS motor evoked potentials, reflects the cognitive load during response inhibition tasks and may be a quantitative, brain-based indicator of impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD.