Configuration path identification of investment risk in China's overseas energy projects: An exploration based on LDA and fsQCA

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Haonan Chen, Anxia Wan, Benhong Peng
{"title":"Configuration path identification of investment risk in China's overseas energy projects: An exploration based on LDA and fsQCA","authors":"Haonan Chen,&nbsp;Anxia Wan,&nbsp;Benhong Peng","doi":"10.1002/ep.14549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>China's overseas energy investment is subject to various risks and uncertainties. This study uses the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model for text mining to comprehensively identify risk factors for overseas energy project investment. Then, we utilize fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to explore the configuration path of risk based on 25 overseas energy project investment cases. The results show that there are six categories of investment risks in overseas energy projects, namely: political risk, economic risk, resource risk, environmental risk, social risk, and national relations risk. The occurrence of a single risk is insufficient to cause an investment in an overseas energy project to fail. Rather, it is only when multiple risks occur together and act in concert that the project is disadvantaged. The configuration paths of risk can be categorized into four types, which are geopolitical dominance type, socio-economic dominance type, resource-environment dominance type, and comprehensive type. From a holistic perspective, this study examines the cumulative impact of multiple risk factors on the investment effect of energy projects, illustrating the inherent complexity of investment risks associated with overseas energy projects. This study provides direction for investors and policymakers to develop effective risk management programs and sound investment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"44 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China's overseas energy investment is subject to various risks and uncertainties. This study uses the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model for text mining to comprehensively identify risk factors for overseas energy project investment. Then, we utilize fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to explore the configuration path of risk based on 25 overseas energy project investment cases. The results show that there are six categories of investment risks in overseas energy projects, namely: political risk, economic risk, resource risk, environmental risk, social risk, and national relations risk. The occurrence of a single risk is insufficient to cause an investment in an overseas energy project to fail. Rather, it is only when multiple risks occur together and act in concert that the project is disadvantaged. The configuration paths of risk can be categorized into four types, which are geopolitical dominance type, socio-economic dominance type, resource-environment dominance type, and comprehensive type. From a holistic perspective, this study examines the cumulative impact of multiple risk factors on the investment effect of energy projects, illustrating the inherent complexity of investment risks associated with overseas energy projects. This study provides direction for investors and policymakers to develop effective risk management programs and sound investment strategies.

中国海外能源项目投资风险配置路径识别:基于LDA和fsQCA的探索
中国对外能源投资存在各种风险和不确定性。本研究采用潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)模型进行文本挖掘,对海外能源项目投资风险因素进行综合识别。然后,基于25个海外能源项目投资案例,运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法探索风险配置路径。结果表明,我国海外能源项目投资风险主要有六大类,即政治风险、经济风险、资源风险、环境风险、社会风险和国家关系风险。单一风险的发生不足以导致海外能源项目投资的失败。更确切地说,只有当多个风险同时发生并协同行动时,项目才会处于不利地位。风险配置路径可分为地缘政治优势型、社会经济优势型、资源环境优势型和综合优势型四种类型。本研究从整体角度考察了多种风险因素对能源项目投资效果的累积影响,说明了海外能源项目投资风险的内在复杂性。本研究为投资者和决策者制定有效的风险管理方案和健全的投资策略提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信