Carotid plaque CTA analysis in patients with initial and recurrent ischemic stroke

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hui Zhao , Yanqi Shan , Wei Hu , Moran Yang , Xijun Gong , Qisong Zhou , Dai Zhang , Jing Jin
{"title":"Carotid plaque CTA analysis in patients with initial and recurrent ischemic stroke","authors":"Hui Zhao ,&nbsp;Yanqi Shan ,&nbsp;Wei Hu ,&nbsp;Moran Yang ,&nbsp;Xijun Gong ,&nbsp;Qisong Zhou ,&nbsp;Dai Zhang ,&nbsp;Jing Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Recurrent ischemic stroke leads to prolonged hospital stays, deterioration in functional outcomes, increased disability and mortality rates. The composition of plaques is closely related to the occurrence of stroke. Our aim was to explore differences in carotid plaque characteristics between patients with initial and recurrent ischemic stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted on 208 anterior circulation stroke patients who had completed head and neck CT angiography (CTA) examinations. Patients were divided into initial cerebral infarction (ICI) group and recurrent cerebral infarction (RCI) group according to clinical and imaging data. The histological and morphological characteristics of the plaques were assessed by using VascuCAP software. The general demographic data, plaque characteristics, and serological indicators were compared between the two groups. Then, the association between plaque characteristics were investigated. To investigate the contribution of plaque characteristics for predicting the risk of stroke recurrence, we have constructed multivariate logistic regression models with plaque characteristics and blood lipid level parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant differences in total carotid plaque volume (<em>P</em> = 0.002) between the ICI and RCI groups. The volume and percentage of Intraplaque Hemorrhage (IPH) and calcification (CALC) in the RCI group were significantly higher than those in the ICI group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There were also statistically significant differences in IPH volume (P=<0.001)and IPH percentage (P<0.001)between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides in the RCI group. In the ICI group, the difference in the maximum stenosis of the carotid artery lumen was statistically significant between the 2 sides (P = 0.025). The total cholesterol (<em>P</em> = 0.024) and triglyceride levels (<em>P</em> = 0.049) was significantly larger in the ICI group than in the RCI group. Further, there is a significant negative correlation between the volumes and percentages of IPH and CALC in the ICI group (volume, <em>r</em> = -0.225, <em>P</em> = 0.021; percentage, <em>r</em> = -0.293, <em>P</em> = 0.002). In addition, IPH volume and percentage were independent predictors in the logistic model with combined features of plaque volume, plaque percentage and blood lipid level (AUC = 0.755, 95 %CI 0.690–0.820).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The volume of total carotid plaque and IPH were significantly different between the ICI group and RCI group. The IPH volume and percentage on the symptomatic side of the RCI group were higher than those on the asymptomatic side. IPH has important indicative significance in identifying patients at risk of recurrent stroke.</div><div>Abbreviations: CTA, computed tomography angiography; ICI, initial cerebral infarction; RCI, recurrent cerebral infarction; IPH, intraplaque hemorrhage; CALC, calcification; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 112058"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25001445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Recurrent ischemic stroke leads to prolonged hospital stays, deterioration in functional outcomes, increased disability and mortality rates. The composition of plaques is closely related to the occurrence of stroke. Our aim was to explore differences in carotid plaque characteristics between patients with initial and recurrent ischemic stroke.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 208 anterior circulation stroke patients who had completed head and neck CT angiography (CTA) examinations. Patients were divided into initial cerebral infarction (ICI) group and recurrent cerebral infarction (RCI) group according to clinical and imaging data. The histological and morphological characteristics of the plaques were assessed by using VascuCAP software. The general demographic data, plaque characteristics, and serological indicators were compared between the two groups. Then, the association between plaque characteristics were investigated. To investigate the contribution of plaque characteristics for predicting the risk of stroke recurrence, we have constructed multivariate logistic regression models with plaque characteristics and blood lipid level parameters.

Results

There were significant differences in total carotid plaque volume (P = 0.002) between the ICI and RCI groups. The volume and percentage of Intraplaque Hemorrhage (IPH) and calcification (CALC) in the RCI group were significantly higher than those in the ICI group (P < 0.05). There were also statistically significant differences in IPH volume (P=<0.001)and IPH percentage (P<0.001)between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides in the RCI group. In the ICI group, the difference in the maximum stenosis of the carotid artery lumen was statistically significant between the 2 sides (P = 0.025). The total cholesterol (P = 0.024) and triglyceride levels (P = 0.049) was significantly larger in the ICI group than in the RCI group. Further, there is a significant negative correlation between the volumes and percentages of IPH and CALC in the ICI group (volume, r = -0.225, P = 0.021; percentage, r = -0.293, P = 0.002). In addition, IPH volume and percentage were independent predictors in the logistic model with combined features of plaque volume, plaque percentage and blood lipid level (AUC = 0.755, 95 %CI 0.690–0.820).

Conclusion

The volume of total carotid plaque and IPH were significantly different between the ICI group and RCI group. The IPH volume and percentage on the symptomatic side of the RCI group were higher than those on the asymptomatic side. IPH has important indicative significance in identifying patients at risk of recurrent stroke.
Abbreviations: CTA, computed tomography angiography; ICI, initial cerebral infarction; RCI, recurrent cerebral infarction; IPH, intraplaque hemorrhage; CALC, calcification; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信