The impact of human-elephant conflicts on farm households’ land lease behavior: The case of Yunnan Province, China

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Xian Liang , Tianyu Chen , Hui Xiao , Yi Xie
{"title":"The impact of human-elephant conflicts on farm households’ land lease behavior: The case of Yunnan Province, China","authors":"Xian Liang ,&nbsp;Tianyu Chen ,&nbsp;Hui Xiao ,&nbsp;Yi Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, the persistent interactions between Asian elephants and agricultural communities have posed significant challenges to the livelihoods of farmers as well as the utilization of their land resources. This study analyzed whether and how the Human-Elephant Conflicts (HEC) affected the land lease behavior of the farm households using a sample of 915 farm households in 9 counties of Yunnan Province, China, in 2022. The Bivariate Probit model was used to explore the impact of HEC on the land lease in and land lease out of farm households. Four options were recognized in the Bivariate Probit model: no lease, sole lease in, sole lease out, and both lease in and lease out. The results show that: (1) The incidence of HEC signified a 25.40 % rise in sole lease out, and a 28.90 % rise in both lease in and lease out. (2) There was heterogeneity in the effect of HEC on farmers' land lease behavior. Farmers who live far away from nature reserves had a higher probability of leasing in (14.70 %) and leasing out their land (8.30 %) than farmers who live close to nature reserves. High-income farmers had a higher probability of leasing out (14.20 %) than low-income farmers; yet, they had a lower probability of leasing in (5.00 %). Small-scale land management farmers had a higher probability of leasing out land (6.70 %) than the large-scale land management group; yet, they had a lower probability of leasing in land (11.80 %). The results suggest that more focused strategies need to be adopted to help the local communities reduce the harm induced by HEC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107532"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the persistent interactions between Asian elephants and agricultural communities have posed significant challenges to the livelihoods of farmers as well as the utilization of their land resources. This study analyzed whether and how the Human-Elephant Conflicts (HEC) affected the land lease behavior of the farm households using a sample of 915 farm households in 9 counties of Yunnan Province, China, in 2022. The Bivariate Probit model was used to explore the impact of HEC on the land lease in and land lease out of farm households. Four options were recognized in the Bivariate Probit model: no lease, sole lease in, sole lease out, and both lease in and lease out. The results show that: (1) The incidence of HEC signified a 25.40 % rise in sole lease out, and a 28.90 % rise in both lease in and lease out. (2) There was heterogeneity in the effect of HEC on farmers' land lease behavior. Farmers who live far away from nature reserves had a higher probability of leasing in (14.70 %) and leasing out their land (8.30 %) than farmers who live close to nature reserves. High-income farmers had a higher probability of leasing out (14.20 %) than low-income farmers; yet, they had a lower probability of leasing in (5.00 %). Small-scale land management farmers had a higher probability of leasing out land (6.70 %) than the large-scale land management group; yet, they had a lower probability of leasing in land (11.80 %). The results suggest that more focused strategies need to be adopted to help the local communities reduce the harm induced by HEC.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信