Patient-reported factors determining long-term follow-up after total knee arthroplasty in individuals with knee osteoarthritis visiting a tertiary care hospital

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Saidan Shetty , Sandeep Vijayan , G Arun Maiya , Mohandas Rao Kg , Bincy M. George
{"title":"Patient-reported factors determining long-term follow-up after total knee arthroplasty in individuals with knee osteoarthritis visiting a tertiary care hospital","authors":"Saidan Shetty ,&nbsp;Sandeep Vijayan ,&nbsp;G Arun Maiya ,&nbsp;Mohandas Rao Kg ,&nbsp;Bincy M. George","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Postoperative follow-up after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for patients, surgeons, and rehabilitation specialists to monitor patient prognosis. Loss to follow-up is a common problem noted following surgery, and many factors influence follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to report patient-reported factors determining long-term follow-up after TKA in individuals with knee OA visiting a tertiary care hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent TKA from January 2021 to December 2022 at a tertiary care hospital in South India were contacted via telephone. Demographic details, follow-up history, reasons for loss to follow-up to the hospital, patient satisfaction, pain, patient-reported function, and quality of life (QoL) were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the patients, 26.8 % returned for long-term follow-up, whereas 73.2 % were lost to follow-up after TKA. A list of patient-reported factors determining long-term follow-up following TKA was noted. Overall, 81.8 % of patients reported satisfaction following surgery, whereas 18.2 % expressed dissatisfaction. The mean postoperative scores on the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) score, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and short form-36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A range of patient-reported factors, such as the absence of symptoms, longer wait times in the hospital, increased travel distance to the hospital, the absence of caregivers, financial constraints, the COVID-19 pandemic, and other unspecified reasons were noted as reasons, for loss to follow-up following TKA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 124-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25000765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Postoperative follow-up after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for patients, surgeons, and rehabilitation specialists to monitor patient prognosis. Loss to follow-up is a common problem noted following surgery, and many factors influence follow-up.

Objective

The objective of this study was to report patient-reported factors determining long-term follow-up after TKA in individuals with knee OA visiting a tertiary care hospital.

Methods

Patients who underwent TKA from January 2021 to December 2022 at a tertiary care hospital in South India were contacted via telephone. Demographic details, follow-up history, reasons for loss to follow-up to the hospital, patient satisfaction, pain, patient-reported function, and quality of life (QoL) were noted.

Results

Among the patients, 26.8 % returned for long-term follow-up, whereas 73.2 % were lost to follow-up after TKA. A list of patient-reported factors determining long-term follow-up following TKA was noted. Overall, 81.8 % of patients reported satisfaction following surgery, whereas 18.2 % expressed dissatisfaction. The mean postoperative scores on the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) score, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and short form-36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire were noted.

Conclusion

A range of patient-reported factors, such as the absence of symptoms, longer wait times in the hospital, increased travel distance to the hospital, the absence of caregivers, financial constraints, the COVID-19 pandemic, and other unspecified reasons were noted as reasons, for loss to follow-up following TKA.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信