{"title":"A critical address to advancements and challenges in computational strategies for structural prediction of protein in recent past","authors":"Nida Fatima Ali , Shumaila Khan , Saadia Zahid","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protein structure prediction has undergone significant advancements, driven by the limitations of experimental techniques like X-ray crystallography, NMR, and cryo-EM, which are costly and time-consuming. To bridge the gap between protein sequences and their structures, computational methods have emerged as essential tools. Traditional approaches such as homology modeling, threading, and <em>ab initio</em> folding made progress but often lacked atomic-level precision. The field has been revolutionized by deep learning-based models such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, and OpenFold, which have demonstrated unprecedented accuracy in predicting protein structures. These AI-driven models leverage vast datasets and neural networks to generate highly reliable structural predictions, sometimes rivaling experimental methods. This review explores the historical evolution of computational protein structure prediction, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of state-of-the-art models. These models have broad applications in fields such as drug discovery, enzyme engineering, and disease-related protein modeling. However, challenges remain, including the need for extensive training data, computational resource requirements, and difficulties in modeling protein dynamics, intrinsically disordered regions, and protein-protein interactions. Future directions in the field include improving AI models to address current limitations, better integration with experimental techniques, and extending predictions to protein complexes and post-translational modifications. By continuing to refine these methods, computational protein structure prediction will further enhance biomedical research and therapeutic design, reshaping the landscape of structural biology and computational biophysics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10616,"journal":{"name":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927125000908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Protein structure prediction has undergone significant advancements, driven by the limitations of experimental techniques like X-ray crystallography, NMR, and cryo-EM, which are costly and time-consuming. To bridge the gap between protein sequences and their structures, computational methods have emerged as essential tools. Traditional approaches such as homology modeling, threading, and ab initio folding made progress but often lacked atomic-level precision. The field has been revolutionized by deep learning-based models such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, and OpenFold, which have demonstrated unprecedented accuracy in predicting protein structures. These AI-driven models leverage vast datasets and neural networks to generate highly reliable structural predictions, sometimes rivaling experimental methods. This review explores the historical evolution of computational protein structure prediction, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of state-of-the-art models. These models have broad applications in fields such as drug discovery, enzyme engineering, and disease-related protein modeling. However, challenges remain, including the need for extensive training data, computational resource requirements, and difficulties in modeling protein dynamics, intrinsically disordered regions, and protein-protein interactions. Future directions in the field include improving AI models to address current limitations, better integration with experimental techniques, and extending predictions to protein complexes and post-translational modifications. By continuing to refine these methods, computational protein structure prediction will further enhance biomedical research and therapeutic design, reshaping the landscape of structural biology and computational biophysics.
期刊介绍:
Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences. High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or chemical-biology-specific modeling, and structural biology of nucleic acids and proteins are particularly welcome. Exceptionally high quality research work in bioinformatics, systems biology, ecology, computational pharmacology, metabolism, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and statistical genetics will also be considered.
Given their inherent uncertainty, protein modeling and molecular docking studies should be thoroughly validated. In the absence of experimental results for validation, the use of molecular dynamics simulations along with detailed free energy calculations, for example, should be used as complementary techniques to support the major conclusions. Submissions of premature modeling exercises without additional biological insights will not be considered.
Review articles will generally be commissioned by the editors and should not be submitted to the journal without explicit invitation. However prospective authors are welcome to send a brief (one to three pages) synopsis, which will be evaluated by the editors.