A critical address to advancements and challenges in computational strategies for structural prediction of protein in recent past

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Nida Fatima Ali , Shumaila Khan , Saadia Zahid
{"title":"A critical address to advancements and challenges in computational strategies for structural prediction of protein in recent past","authors":"Nida Fatima Ali ,&nbsp;Shumaila Khan ,&nbsp;Saadia Zahid","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protein structure prediction has undergone significant advancements, driven by the limitations of experimental techniques like X-ray crystallography, NMR, and cryo-EM, which are costly and time-consuming. To bridge the gap between protein sequences and their structures, computational methods have emerged as essential tools. Traditional approaches such as homology modeling, threading, and <em>ab initio</em> folding made progress but often lacked atomic-level precision. The field has been revolutionized by deep learning-based models such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, and OpenFold, which have demonstrated unprecedented accuracy in predicting protein structures. These AI-driven models leverage vast datasets and neural networks to generate highly reliable structural predictions, sometimes rivaling experimental methods. This review explores the historical evolution of computational protein structure prediction, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of state-of-the-art models. These models have broad applications in fields such as drug discovery, enzyme engineering, and disease-related protein modeling. However, challenges remain, including the need for extensive training data, computational resource requirements, and difficulties in modeling protein dynamics, intrinsically disordered regions, and protein-protein interactions. Future directions in the field include improving AI models to address current limitations, better integration with experimental techniques, and extending predictions to protein complexes and post-translational modifications. By continuing to refine these methods, computational protein structure prediction will further enhance biomedical research and therapeutic design, reshaping the landscape of structural biology and computational biophysics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10616,"journal":{"name":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927125000908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protein structure prediction has undergone significant advancements, driven by the limitations of experimental techniques like X-ray crystallography, NMR, and cryo-EM, which are costly and time-consuming. To bridge the gap between protein sequences and their structures, computational methods have emerged as essential tools. Traditional approaches such as homology modeling, threading, and ab initio folding made progress but often lacked atomic-level precision. The field has been revolutionized by deep learning-based models such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, and OpenFold, which have demonstrated unprecedented accuracy in predicting protein structures. These AI-driven models leverage vast datasets and neural networks to generate highly reliable structural predictions, sometimes rivaling experimental methods. This review explores the historical evolution of computational protein structure prediction, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of state-of-the-art models. These models have broad applications in fields such as drug discovery, enzyme engineering, and disease-related protein modeling. However, challenges remain, including the need for extensive training data, computational resource requirements, and difficulties in modeling protein dynamics, intrinsically disordered regions, and protein-protein interactions. Future directions in the field include improving AI models to address current limitations, better integration with experimental techniques, and extending predictions to protein complexes and post-translational modifications. By continuing to refine these methods, computational protein structure prediction will further enhance biomedical research and therapeutic design, reshaping the landscape of structural biology and computational biophysics.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Biology and Chemistry
Computational Biology and Chemistry 生物-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
142
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences. High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or chemical-biology-specific modeling, and structural biology of nucleic acids and proteins are particularly welcome. Exceptionally high quality research work in bioinformatics, systems biology, ecology, computational pharmacology, metabolism, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and statistical genetics will also be considered. Given their inherent uncertainty, protein modeling and molecular docking studies should be thoroughly validated. In the absence of experimental results for validation, the use of molecular dynamics simulations along with detailed free energy calculations, for example, should be used as complementary techniques to support the major conclusions. Submissions of premature modeling exercises without additional biological insights will not be considered. Review articles will generally be commissioned by the editors and should not be submitted to the journal without explicit invitation. However prospective authors are welcome to send a brief (one to three pages) synopsis, which will be evaluated by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信