Revealing the mobile UX horizon: Exploring user experience aspects, attributes, and measurement methods - A systematic mapping study

IF 4.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Haifa Alshammare , Mohammad Alshayeb , Malak Baslyman
{"title":"Revealing the mobile UX horizon: Exploring user experience aspects, attributes, and measurement methods - A systematic mapping study","authors":"Haifa Alshammare ,&nbsp;Mohammad Alshayeb ,&nbsp;Malak Baslyman","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2025.103999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The exponential growth of mobile internet usage underscores the critical importance of investigating mobile app enhancements across various domains. User Experience (UX) emerges as a pivotal quality factor, encompassing emotional, sensory, and contextual dimensions, significantly influencing user behavior and retention.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic mapping study investigates research efforts on mobile application UX to discern domains where UX has been explored, identifying UX aspects, attributes, and assessment methods.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Through a standard systematic mapping procedure, 189 primary studies were identified from 9107 reviewed articles across five digital libraries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>100 distinct UX aspects and 166 attributes were identified and categorized into App, User, and Context aspects. These aspects were distributed among 14 domains, with healthcare being extensively researched. The usability aspect is prominent in 54.5 % of studies. Efficiency, satisfaction, effectiveness, learnability, memorability, attractiveness, errors, and ease of use emerged as the most commonly utilized attributes—notably, these attributes are considered usability attributes among several standards. Additionally, 38 and 22 evaluation methods were identified for aspects and attributes, grouped into self-reported, physiological, observational, and expert evaluation categories. Questionnaires were predominantly utilized.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review summarizes the mobile application UX landscape, highlighting key aspects, attributes, and evaluation methods across domains. Future research should leverage these insights to advance UX design and evaluation practices, fostering innovation in software engineering and human-computer interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50635,"journal":{"name":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 103999"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548925000285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The exponential growth of mobile internet usage underscores the critical importance of investigating mobile app enhancements across various domains. User Experience (UX) emerges as a pivotal quality factor, encompassing emotional, sensory, and contextual dimensions, significantly influencing user behavior and retention.

Objective

This systematic mapping study investigates research efforts on mobile application UX to discern domains where UX has been explored, identifying UX aspects, attributes, and assessment methods.

Method

Through a standard systematic mapping procedure, 189 primary studies were identified from 9107 reviewed articles across five digital libraries.

Results

100 distinct UX aspects and 166 attributes were identified and categorized into App, User, and Context aspects. These aspects were distributed among 14 domains, with healthcare being extensively researched. The usability aspect is prominent in 54.5 % of studies. Efficiency, satisfaction, effectiveness, learnability, memorability, attractiveness, errors, and ease of use emerged as the most commonly utilized attributes—notably, these attributes are considered usability attributes among several standards. Additionally, 38 and 22 evaluation methods were identified for aspects and attributes, grouped into self-reported, physiological, observational, and expert evaluation categories. Questionnaires were predominantly utilized.

Conclusion

This review summarizes the mobile application UX landscape, highlighting key aspects, attributes, and evaluation methods across domains. Future research should leverage these insights to advance UX design and evaluation practices, fostering innovation in software engineering and human-computer interaction.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Standards & Interfaces
Computer Standards & Interfaces 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The quality of software, well-defined interfaces (hardware and software), the process of digitalisation, and accepted standards in these fields are essential for building and exploiting complex computing, communication, multimedia and measuring systems. Standards can simplify the design and construction of individual hardware and software components and help to ensure satisfactory interworking. Computer Standards & Interfaces is an international journal dealing specifically with these topics. The journal • Provides information about activities and progress on the definition of computer standards, software quality, interfaces and methods, at national, European and international levels • Publishes critical comments on standards and standards activities • Disseminates user''s experiences and case studies in the application and exploitation of established or emerging standards, interfaces and methods • Offers a forum for discussion on actual projects, standards, interfaces and methods by recognised experts • Stimulates relevant research by providing a specialised refereed medium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信