Flexural behaviour of old wooden beams strengthened with CFRP: Experimental and numerical investigations

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Minel Ahu Kara Alaşalvar , Özlem Sağıroğlu Demirci , Sercan Tuna Akkaya , Abdullah Türer , Alper Çelik , Ömer Mercimek , Özgür Anıl
{"title":"Flexural behaviour of old wooden beams strengthened with CFRP: Experimental and numerical investigations","authors":"Minel Ahu Kara Alaşalvar ,&nbsp;Özlem Sağıroğlu Demirci ,&nbsp;Sercan Tuna Akkaya ,&nbsp;Abdullah Türer ,&nbsp;Alper Çelik ,&nbsp;Ömer Mercimek ,&nbsp;Özgür Anıl","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The flexural performance of old wooden beams strengthened with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strips was investigated through a combination of experimental and numerical analyses. Timber specimens were sourced from three historic wooden structures in Türkiye. CFRP strips were bonded to the tension zone of the beams to enhance flexural performance, while transverse CFRP strips were applied at regular intervals to improve shear resistance. A total of thirty-one beam specimens, varying in wood type, span length, and CFRP strip spacing, were tested under three-point bending. Key variables included chestnut and elm wood, span lengths of 300–700 mm, and CFRP strip spacings of 50 mm, 75 mm, and 100 mm. Beams with 50 mm strip spacing (S5) exhibited the highest values with load capacity (52.7 kN), stiffness (3.55 kN/mm) occurred in elm beams, while the largest displacement (25.3 mm) and energy dissipation (494 kN-mm) occurred in chestnut beams. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was employed to assess strain distributions, while numerical models were developed using finite element analysis (FEA) to validate experimental results. DIC analysis confirmed that peak strains occurred near the loading point, while minimum strains were observed at the supports. FEA models closely matched experimental data, with parameter ratios mostly ranging between 0.64 and 1.16, confirming their reliability. The numerical analysis aligned closely with experimental outcomes, showcasing its effectiveness in modelling the anisotropic and heterogeneous nature of timber. These findings highlight CFRP’s effectiveness in strengthening and preserving historic wooden structures, offering a sustainable solution for modern timber engineering applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 108718"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425005326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The flexural performance of old wooden beams strengthened with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strips was investigated through a combination of experimental and numerical analyses. Timber specimens were sourced from three historic wooden structures in Türkiye. CFRP strips were bonded to the tension zone of the beams to enhance flexural performance, while transverse CFRP strips were applied at regular intervals to improve shear resistance. A total of thirty-one beam specimens, varying in wood type, span length, and CFRP strip spacing, were tested under three-point bending. Key variables included chestnut and elm wood, span lengths of 300–700 mm, and CFRP strip spacings of 50 mm, 75 mm, and 100 mm. Beams with 50 mm strip spacing (S5) exhibited the highest values with load capacity (52.7 kN), stiffness (3.55 kN/mm) occurred in elm beams, while the largest displacement (25.3 mm) and energy dissipation (494 kN-mm) occurred in chestnut beams. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was employed to assess strain distributions, while numerical models were developed using finite element analysis (FEA) to validate experimental results. DIC analysis confirmed that peak strains occurred near the loading point, while minimum strains were observed at the supports. FEA models closely matched experimental data, with parameter ratios mostly ranging between 0.64 and 1.16, confirming their reliability. The numerical analysis aligned closely with experimental outcomes, showcasing its effectiveness in modelling the anisotropic and heterogeneous nature of timber. These findings highlight CFRP’s effectiveness in strengthening and preserving historic wooden structures, offering a sustainable solution for modern timber engineering applications.
通过实验和数值分析相结合的方法,研究了使用碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)条加固的旧木梁的抗弯性能。木材试样取自土耳其三座历史悠久的木结构建筑。在梁的受拉区粘接 CFRP 带以提高抗弯性能,而在横向以一定间隔粘接 CFRP 带以提高抗剪性能。在三点弯曲试验中,共测试了 31 个横梁试样,这些试样的木材类型、跨度长度和 CFRP 带间距各不相同。主要变量包括栗木和榆木、300-700 毫米的跨度长度以及 50 毫米、75 毫米和 100 毫米的 CFRP 带间距。带间距为 50 毫米的梁(S5)的承载能力(52.7 千牛顿)和刚度(3.55 千牛顿/毫米)在榆木梁中表现出最高值,而最大位移(25.3 毫米)和能量耗散(494 千牛顿-毫米)则出现在栗木梁中。采用数字图像相关(DIC)来评估应变分布,同时利用有限元分析(FEA)建立数值模型来验证实验结果。DIC 分析证实,峰值应变出现在加载点附近,而最小应变出现在支撑点。有限元分析模型与实验数据非常吻合,参数比大多在 0.64 和 1.16 之间,这证实了模型的可靠性。数值分析与实验结果密切吻合,显示了其在模拟木材的各向异性和异质性方面的有效性。这些研究结果凸显了 CFRP 在加固和保护历史悠久的木结构方面的有效性,为现代木材工程应用提供了一种可持续的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信