Sustainable finance, biodiversity, and greenwashing: how contested values, metrics, and causation facilitate information distortion, information omission, and information pollution
{"title":"Sustainable finance, biodiversity, and greenwashing: how contested values, metrics, and causation facilitate information distortion, information omission, and information pollution","authors":"Job de Grefte, Boudewijn de Bruin","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biodiversity finance aims to support ecosystem and habitat preservation but faces significant challenges of greenwashing. This article critically examines the specific difficulties in addressing greenwashing within biodiversity finance. Through a critical interpretative review of recent theoretical and empirical studies, the article shows how the contested value of biodiversity, its diverse measurement methodologies, and the debated causal impacts of biodiversity finance create opportunities for greenwashing. These challenges are not general issues of sustainable finance but are tied to the specific aspects of biodiversity finance. The article highlights the need for tailor-made policy and regulatory frameworks to effectively mitigate greenwashing in biodiversity finance. Pinpointing the specific avenues through which greenwashing can occur, this critical interpretative review contributes to the literature by presenting a conceptual foundational framework for addressing greenwashing risks in biodiversity finance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101522"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343525000156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biodiversity finance aims to support ecosystem and habitat preservation but faces significant challenges of greenwashing. This article critically examines the specific difficulties in addressing greenwashing within biodiversity finance. Through a critical interpretative review of recent theoretical and empirical studies, the article shows how the contested value of biodiversity, its diverse measurement methodologies, and the debated causal impacts of biodiversity finance create opportunities for greenwashing. These challenges are not general issues of sustainable finance but are tied to the specific aspects of biodiversity finance. The article highlights the need for tailor-made policy and regulatory frameworks to effectively mitigate greenwashing in biodiversity finance. Pinpointing the specific avenues through which greenwashing can occur, this critical interpretative review contributes to the literature by presenting a conceptual foundational framework for addressing greenwashing risks in biodiversity finance.
期刊介绍:
"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.