Ashlea Bartram , Murthy Mittinty , Md Abdul Ahad , Svetlana Bogomolova , Joanne Dono , Aimee L. Brownbill , Nathan J. Harrison , Jacqui Garcia , Ivana Glavinic , Mia May , Jacqueline Bowden
{"title":"Alcohol advertising in disguise: Exposure to zero-alcohol products prompts adolescents to think of alcohol—Reaction time experimental study","authors":"Ashlea Bartram , Murthy Mittinty , Md Abdul Ahad , Svetlana Bogomolova , Joanne Dono , Aimee L. Brownbill , Nathan J. Harrison , Jacqui Garcia , Ivana Glavinic , Mia May , Jacqueline Bowden","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Zero-alcohol drinks (<0.5 % alcohol by volume) appear and taste like alcoholic drinks; they may feature brands from alcoholic drinks (“brand extensions”) or “new-to-world” brands. These drinks are not consistently included within many restrictions aimed at reducing adolescents’ exposure to alcohol products and advertising. This online study examined whether adolescents implicitly categorise images of zero-alcohol drinks as alcoholic beverages.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>331 Australian adolescents aged 15–17 years participated in an online within-subjects reaction time experiment. Participants viewed 20 randomly-ordered images of alcohol, zero-alcohol, and soft drink products and were asked to indicate as quickly as possible whether these images made them think of alcohol, with both response time and agreement recorded. Generalised linear mixed effects models were used to examine differences in response time and agreement by drink type, adjusting for clustering of responses within participants, recent consumption, survey device (mobile/computer), and parental presence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most images of alcoholic (94.4 %), brand extension zero-alcohol (90.7 %), and “new-to-world” zero-alcohol (85.6 %) drinks prompted participants to think of alcohol, compared to 5.2 % of soft drinks. In the mixed effects model, compared to alcoholic drinks, participants on average responded 72 ms slower to brand extension zero-alcohol drinks and 215 ms slower to “new-to-world” brand zero-alcohol drinks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The combination of high levels of agreement and slower reaction times suggest that adolescents categorise zero-alcohol drinks as non-typical alcoholic drinks, rather than soft drinks. Thus, exposure to zero-alcohol drinks had similar effects to exposure to alcoholic drinks. Urgent regulatory action is required to ensure that restrictions on alcohol advertising and availability to minors extend to zero-alcohol drinks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104753"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Zero-alcohol drinks (<0.5 % alcohol by volume) appear and taste like alcoholic drinks; they may feature brands from alcoholic drinks (“brand extensions”) or “new-to-world” brands. These drinks are not consistently included within many restrictions aimed at reducing adolescents’ exposure to alcohol products and advertising. This online study examined whether adolescents implicitly categorise images of zero-alcohol drinks as alcoholic beverages.
Methods
331 Australian adolescents aged 15–17 years participated in an online within-subjects reaction time experiment. Participants viewed 20 randomly-ordered images of alcohol, zero-alcohol, and soft drink products and were asked to indicate as quickly as possible whether these images made them think of alcohol, with both response time and agreement recorded. Generalised linear mixed effects models were used to examine differences in response time and agreement by drink type, adjusting for clustering of responses within participants, recent consumption, survey device (mobile/computer), and parental presence.
Results
Most images of alcoholic (94.4 %), brand extension zero-alcohol (90.7 %), and “new-to-world” zero-alcohol (85.6 %) drinks prompted participants to think of alcohol, compared to 5.2 % of soft drinks. In the mixed effects model, compared to alcoholic drinks, participants on average responded 72 ms slower to brand extension zero-alcohol drinks and 215 ms slower to “new-to-world” brand zero-alcohol drinks.
Conclusions
The combination of high levels of agreement and slower reaction times suggest that adolescents categorise zero-alcohol drinks as non-typical alcoholic drinks, rather than soft drinks. Thus, exposure to zero-alcohol drinks had similar effects to exposure to alcoholic drinks. Urgent regulatory action is required to ensure that restrictions on alcohol advertising and availability to minors extend to zero-alcohol drinks.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.