Tailoring the approach: Management of femur fractures in post-polio syndrome patients

Q2 Medicine
Venkatesan Senthil Kannan, Singanallur Palanivelayutham Sivakumar, Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
{"title":"Tailoring the approach: Management of femur fractures in post-polio syndrome patients","authors":"Venkatesan Senthil Kannan,&nbsp;Singanallur Palanivelayutham Sivakumar,&nbsp;Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan,&nbsp;Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-polio syndrome (PPS) can significantly alter lower limb anatomy and function. Femur is the most commonly fractured bone in post-polio patients. This study aimed to investigate the surgical challenges, fixation techniques employed, and functional outcomes in PPS patients with femoral fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 38 PPS patients diagnosed with femoral fractures. We assessed the underlying injury mechanism, anatomical variations (e.g., valgus neck deformity, hypoplastic greater trochanter, narrow canal, fixed knee flexion), and employed fixation techniques. Union time and functional recovery were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Trivial falls were the most frequent cause of fracture. Notably, various anatomical variations were observed, potentially influencing treatment strategies. Intramedullary nailing was the preferred fixation method; however, some cases necessitated alternative extramedullary fixation techniques due to anatomical constraints. The average time for fracture union was 24 weeks, with all patients regaining their pre-fracture functional status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Femoral fracture management in PPS patients requires meticulous consideration of unique anatomical challenges and patient-specific factors. A multidisciplinary approach emphasizing preoperative planning, intraoperative adaptability in fixation techniques, and comprehensive postoperative rehabilitation is crucial for optimal outcomes and minimizing complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102979"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S097656622500075X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Post-polio syndrome (PPS) can significantly alter lower limb anatomy and function. Femur is the most commonly fractured bone in post-polio patients. This study aimed to investigate the surgical challenges, fixation techniques employed, and functional outcomes in PPS patients with femoral fractures.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 38 PPS patients diagnosed with femoral fractures. We assessed the underlying injury mechanism, anatomical variations (e.g., valgus neck deformity, hypoplastic greater trochanter, narrow canal, fixed knee flexion), and employed fixation techniques. Union time and functional recovery were evaluated.

Results

Trivial falls were the most frequent cause of fracture. Notably, various anatomical variations were observed, potentially influencing treatment strategies. Intramedullary nailing was the preferred fixation method; however, some cases necessitated alternative extramedullary fixation techniques due to anatomical constraints. The average time for fracture union was 24 weeks, with all patients regaining their pre-fracture functional status.

Conclusion

Femoral fracture management in PPS patients requires meticulous consideration of unique anatomical challenges and patient-specific factors. A multidisciplinary approach emphasizing preoperative planning, intraoperative adaptability in fixation techniques, and comprehensive postoperative rehabilitation is crucial for optimal outcomes and minimizing complications.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信