Assessment and improvement of GEDI canopy height estimation in tropical and temperate forests

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Myung-Sik Cho , David P. Roy , Herve B. Kashongwe , Lin Yan , Meicheng Shen
{"title":"Assessment and improvement of GEDI canopy height estimation in tropical and temperate forests","authors":"Myung-Sik Cho ,&nbsp;David P. Roy ,&nbsp;Herve B. Kashongwe ,&nbsp;Lin Yan ,&nbsp;Meicheng Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2025.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) relative height product provides 25 m diameter footprint information that can be used to estimate canopy height but with variably reported accuracy. A methodology is presented to improve the GEDI canopy height accuracy using coincident Airborne Laser Scanner (ALS) data. The GEDI canopy height for each footprint is surface adjusted by adding the residual difference between the GEDI ground elevation estimate and coincident footprint ALS digital terrain model (DTM) value, and then calibrated using site-level additive offsets derived by Theil-Sen regression with coincident footprint ALS canopy height model (CHM) data. The approach is demonstrated at a tropical evergreen lowland forest site in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MNDP), a temperate pine and hardwood forest site in Alabama (TALL), and a temperate mix-species forest site in Maryland (SERC). The GEDI canopy height accuracy is first quantified by comparison with ALS CHM data to provide a baseline. The methodology improved the root mean squared error (RMSE) from 7.5m to 3.4m (MNDP), 5.6m to 3.5m (TALL), and 6.7m to 4.3m (SERC), and improved the relative RMSE from 33.0 % to 14.8 % (MNDP), 27.4 % to 17.3 % (TALL), and 24.9 % to 15.8 % (SERC), for GEDI beam sensitivity ≥0.9, with similar improvements demonstrated for beam sensitivity ≥0.95 and ≥ 0.98. Further accuracy improvements were demonstrated for footprints over homogenous canopies where the simulated impact of GEDI geolocation errors were small, underscoring the need for improved GEDI geolocation. Extrapolation of the methodology to regional or national scale merits further research and is discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017225000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) relative height product provides 25 m diameter footprint information that can be used to estimate canopy height but with variably reported accuracy. A methodology is presented to improve the GEDI canopy height accuracy using coincident Airborne Laser Scanner (ALS) data. The GEDI canopy height for each footprint is surface adjusted by adding the residual difference between the GEDI ground elevation estimate and coincident footprint ALS digital terrain model (DTM) value, and then calibrated using site-level additive offsets derived by Theil-Sen regression with coincident footprint ALS canopy height model (CHM) data. The approach is demonstrated at a tropical evergreen lowland forest site in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MNDP), a temperate pine and hardwood forest site in Alabama (TALL), and a temperate mix-species forest site in Maryland (SERC). The GEDI canopy height accuracy is first quantified by comparison with ALS CHM data to provide a baseline. The methodology improved the root mean squared error (RMSE) from 7.5m to 3.4m (MNDP), 5.6m to 3.5m (TALL), and 6.7m to 4.3m (SERC), and improved the relative RMSE from 33.0 % to 14.8 % (MNDP), 27.4 % to 17.3 % (TALL), and 24.9 % to 15.8 % (SERC), for GEDI beam sensitivity ≥0.9, with similar improvements demonstrated for beam sensitivity ≥0.95 and ≥ 0.98. Further accuracy improvements were demonstrated for footprints over homogenous canopies where the simulated impact of GEDI geolocation errors were small, underscoring the need for improved GEDI geolocation. Extrapolation of the methodology to regional or national scale merits further research and is discussed.
全球生态系统动态调查(GEDI)的相对高度产品提供了直径为 25 米的足迹信息,可用来估算树冠高度,但报告的准确性各不相同。本文介绍了一种利用机载激光扫描仪(ALS)数据提高 GEDI 树冠高度精度的方法。通过添加 GEDI 地面高程估算值与重合足迹 ALS 数字地形模型 (DTM) 值之间的残差,对每个足迹的 GEDI 树冠高度进行表面调整,然后使用通过 Theil-Sen 回归与重合足迹 ALS 树冠高度模型 (CHM) 数据得出的站点级加法偏移进行校准。该方法在刚果民主共和国的一个热带常绿低地森林地点(MNDP)、阿拉巴马州的一个温带松树和硬木森林地点(TALL)以及马里兰州的一个温带混交种森林地点(SERC)进行了演示。GEDI 树冠高度精度首先通过与 ALS CHM 数据的比较进行量化,以提供一个基线。该方法将均方根误差 (RMSE) 从 7.5 米减小到 3.4 米(MNDP)、从 5.6 米减小到 3.5 米(TALL)和从 6.7 米减小到 4.3 米(SERC),并将相对均方根误差从 33.0% 减小到 14.当 GEDI 光束灵敏度≥0.9 时,相对均方根误差从 33.0 % 降至 14.8 %(MNDP),从 27.4 % 降至 17.3 %(TALL),从 24.9 % 降至 15.8 %(SERC)。同质树冠上的足迹精度进一步提高,GEDI 地理定位误差的模拟影响很小,这突出表明需要改进 GEDI 地理定位。将该方法推广到区域或国家范围值得进一步研究和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信