Alternative industrial processing of seaweed meal from Ascophyllum nodosum: Value adding and product development potential of liquid side-streams obtained with different separation methods
IF 3.5 2区 农林科学Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Anna Þóra Hrólfsdóttir , Hildur Inga Sveinsdóttir , Sigurjón Arason , María Gudjónsdóttir
{"title":"Alternative industrial processing of seaweed meal from Ascophyllum nodosum: Value adding and product development potential of liquid side-streams obtained with different separation methods","authors":"Anna Þóra Hrólfsdóttir , Hildur Inga Sveinsdóttir , Sigurjón Arason , María Gudjónsdóttir","doi":"10.1016/j.fbp.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The brown algae <em>Ascophyllum nodosum</em> is harvested from wild sources and used in seaweed meal production. It contains multiple valuable compounds, including polyphenols, polysaccharides and carotenoids that have bioactive properties. In current uses of biomass e.g. as raw material for alginate production, these compounds are not of any special interest, hence there is an opportunity for better utilization of the biomass. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the potential of producing and upscaling production of a byproduct (a targeted seaweed extract produced with mixture of fresh seaweed and water) from the unutilized liquid side-streams obtained within traditional seaweed meal processing. That was performed by evaluating the efficiency of the liquid/solid separation (screw press vs decanter), centrifugation as a secondary separation step, as well as drying methods (spray drying vs freeze drying) on the obtained liquid extracts. Chemical and antioxidant properties were evaluated throughout the alternative processing and mass balances calculated. The results suggest that the decanter was more efficient for separation compared to the screw press due to higher yield of liquid retrieved. The chemical composition and antioxidant properties did not differentiate significantly, neither between the separation methods nor during further processing of the liquids (e.g. centrifugation or drying methods). Furthermore, the alginate remained in the solid phase during separation, and main components extracted with the liquid phase included salt, minerals, polyphenols, and carbohydrates. The results indicate that alternative processing with a decanter as primary separation step could be a feasible solution to meet the demands of full utilization and no-waste policies within seaweed production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12134,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","volume":"151 ","pages":"Pages 127-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308525000513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The brown algae Ascophyllum nodosum is harvested from wild sources and used in seaweed meal production. It contains multiple valuable compounds, including polyphenols, polysaccharides and carotenoids that have bioactive properties. In current uses of biomass e.g. as raw material for alginate production, these compounds are not of any special interest, hence there is an opportunity for better utilization of the biomass. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the potential of producing and upscaling production of a byproduct (a targeted seaweed extract produced with mixture of fresh seaweed and water) from the unutilized liquid side-streams obtained within traditional seaweed meal processing. That was performed by evaluating the efficiency of the liquid/solid separation (screw press vs decanter), centrifugation as a secondary separation step, as well as drying methods (spray drying vs freeze drying) on the obtained liquid extracts. Chemical and antioxidant properties were evaluated throughout the alternative processing and mass balances calculated. The results suggest that the decanter was more efficient for separation compared to the screw press due to higher yield of liquid retrieved. The chemical composition and antioxidant properties did not differentiate significantly, neither between the separation methods nor during further processing of the liquids (e.g. centrifugation or drying methods). Furthermore, the alginate remained in the solid phase during separation, and main components extracted with the liquid phase included salt, minerals, polyphenols, and carbohydrates. The results indicate that alternative processing with a decanter as primary separation step could be a feasible solution to meet the demands of full utilization and no-waste policies within seaweed production.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering:
Part C
FBP aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in the branches of engineering and science dedicated to the safe processing of biological products. It is the only journal to exploit the synergy between biotechnology, bioprocessing and food engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in equipment or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of food and bioproducts processing.
The journal has a strong emphasis on the interface between engineering and food or bioproducts. Papers that are not likely to be published are those:
• Primarily concerned with food formulation
• That use experimental design techniques to obtain response surfaces but gain little insight from them
• That are empirical and ignore established mechanistic models, e.g., empirical drying curves
• That are primarily concerned about sensory evaluation and colour
• Concern the extraction, encapsulation and/or antioxidant activity of a specific biological material without providing insight that could be applied to a similar but different material,
• Containing only chemical analyses of biological materials.