Pulled in different directions – The experiences of birth partners and care-providers when supporting women to implement what they learn in childbirth education classes

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kerry Sutcliffe , Hannah Dahlen , Elizabeth Newnham , Linda Mackay , Kate Levett
{"title":"Pulled in different directions – The experiences of birth partners and care-providers when supporting women to implement what they learn in childbirth education classes","authors":"Kerry Sutcliffe ,&nbsp;Hannah Dahlen ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Newnham ,&nbsp;Linda Mackay ,&nbsp;Kate Levett","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Childbirth education (CBE) is often viewed as a singular intervention separate from the broader maternity system, meaning differences in effectiveness are attributed solely to the program delivered. Understanding the impact support people have on the translation of CBE techniques using Bowen theory as a wider systems-based lens, could offer important insights into the utilisation and effectiveness of CBE techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To examine how the functioning of birth partners and care-providers during labour, impacts the use of CBE strategies employed by women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 11 birth partners; and two focus groups with 12 care-providers, examined their experiences of supporting CBE techniques. Bowen family systems theory concepts were used as a guide for deductive analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Interpersonal and systemic pressures presented a challenge to maintaining CBE strategies, captured in the over-arching theme ‘Pulled in different directions’. Support in using CBE strategies transitioned along two continuums; ‘Positioned with self or other’ and ‘Dominance of thoughts or emotions’, highlighting the challenge of balancing supportive encouragement for CBE with pressure that limits their application.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Birth partners and care-providers are well positioned to help women utilise CBE techniques, but various factors impact their ability to do so. These factors largely relate to systemic pressures that impact inter-personal relations and subsequent individual responses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While birth partners and care-providers aim to support the use of CBE techniques, maternity system level factors leave them feeling ‘pulled in different directions’. This impacts their capacity to continue supporting their use throughout labour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Childbirth education (CBE) is often viewed as a singular intervention separate from the broader maternity system, meaning differences in effectiveness are attributed solely to the program delivered. Understanding the impact support people have on the translation of CBE techniques using Bowen theory as a wider systems-based lens, could offer important insights into the utilisation and effectiveness of CBE techniques.

Aim

To examine how the functioning of birth partners and care-providers during labour, impacts the use of CBE strategies employed by women.

Methods

In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 11 birth partners; and two focus groups with 12 care-providers, examined their experiences of supporting CBE techniques. Bowen family systems theory concepts were used as a guide for deductive analysis.

Findings

Interpersonal and systemic pressures presented a challenge to maintaining CBE strategies, captured in the over-arching theme ‘Pulled in different directions’. Support in using CBE strategies transitioned along two continuums; ‘Positioned with self or other’ and ‘Dominance of thoughts or emotions’, highlighting the challenge of balancing supportive encouragement for CBE with pressure that limits their application.

Discussion

Birth partners and care-providers are well positioned to help women utilise CBE techniques, but various factors impact their ability to do so. These factors largely relate to systemic pressures that impact inter-personal relations and subsequent individual responses.

Conclusion

While birth partners and care-providers aim to support the use of CBE techniques, maternity system level factors leave them feeling ‘pulled in different directions’. This impacts their capacity to continue supporting their use throughout labour.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信