Software architecture decision-making process: The practitioners' view from the Brazilian industry

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Lucas Carvalho , Tayana Conte
{"title":"Software architecture decision-making process: The practitioners' view from the Brazilian industry","authors":"Lucas Carvalho ,&nbsp;Tayana Conte","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2025.103302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the development of modern software solutions, architecture plays a crucial role in the success of the solution, as it comprises structural and behavioral features of the system, along with critical decisions about the system. Given this, several studies have been conducted in the literature about architecture decision-making process, but these studies are normally conducted with professionals outside of the Brazilian perspective or restricted to a specific company. Although architecture knowledge is the same, differences, like cultural behaviors, professional experiences and academic background, may arise. For this reason, this study presents the architecture decision-making from the view of Brazilian software practitioners. The results are a compilation of findings from 12 semi-structured interviews with senior practitioners from different companies and provide insights about the decision-making process. Regarding the context in which decisions are made, it is found that practitioners often guide and influence decisions and use experience as their main foundation, and the process is normally influenced by features of the company, like its domain and size. Concerning the decision-making process, practitioners in most cases use PoCs, organizational patterns or requirements to define the architecture. Group decision-making is often followed, although no systematic approach is used. Also, no tools are employed to support decision-making, and the decisions are documented and revised frequently.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49561,"journal":{"name":"Science of Computer Programming","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 103302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Computer Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642325000413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the development of modern software solutions, architecture plays a crucial role in the success of the solution, as it comprises structural and behavioral features of the system, along with critical decisions about the system. Given this, several studies have been conducted in the literature about architecture decision-making process, but these studies are normally conducted with professionals outside of the Brazilian perspective or restricted to a specific company. Although architecture knowledge is the same, differences, like cultural behaviors, professional experiences and academic background, may arise. For this reason, this study presents the architecture decision-making from the view of Brazilian software practitioners. The results are a compilation of findings from 12 semi-structured interviews with senior practitioners from different companies and provide insights about the decision-making process. Regarding the context in which decisions are made, it is found that practitioners often guide and influence decisions and use experience as their main foundation, and the process is normally influenced by features of the company, like its domain and size. Concerning the decision-making process, practitioners in most cases use PoCs, organizational patterns or requirements to define the architecture. Group decision-making is often followed, although no systematic approach is used. Also, no tools are employed to support decision-making, and the decisions are documented and revised frequently.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of Computer Programming
Science of Computer Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Science of Computer Programming is dedicated to the distribution of research results in the areas of software systems development, use and maintenance, including the software aspects of hardware design. The journal has a wide scope ranging from the many facets of methodological foundations to the details of technical issues andthe aspects of industrial practice. The subjects of interest to SCP cover the entire spectrum of methods for the entire life cycle of software systems, including • Requirements, specification, design, validation, verification, coding, testing, maintenance, metrics and renovation of software; • Design, implementation and evaluation of programming languages; • Programming environments, development tools, visualisation and animation; • Management of the development process; • Human factors in software, software for social interaction, software for social computing; • Cyber physical systems, and software for the interaction between the physical and the machine; • Software aspects of infrastructure services, system administration, and network management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信