Enhancing emotional support in human-robot interaction: Implementing emotion regulation mechanisms in a personal drone

Ori Fartook , Zachary McKendrick , Tal Oron-Gilad , Jessica R. Cauchard
{"title":"Enhancing emotional support in human-robot interaction: Implementing emotion regulation mechanisms in a personal drone","authors":"Ori Fartook ,&nbsp;Zachary McKendrick ,&nbsp;Tal Oron-Gilad ,&nbsp;Jessica R. Cauchard","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We propose that social robots can enhance their social abilities by supporting peoples' emotional needs. We examined this concept by implementing four different mechanisms aimed at providing Emotional Support in a personal drone. These mechanisms (Affective Empathy, Cognitive Empathy, Positive Emotion Regulation (PER), and a Reasoning mechanism (yoU-turn)) provide various aspects of support ranging on the Emotional-Reasoning spectrum. In an online study (<em>N</em> = 95), first, participants were asked to sequentially recall situations where they experienced one of six emotional states (i.e., being calm, bored, excited, hyperactivated, scared, or sleepy).</div><div>Following each induced emotion, participants ranked their preferred drone response to their specific emotional state. Results indicate that participants' preferences were based on the valence of their emotional state, emphasizing the need for social drones to have multiple response mechanisms to support their users. This work contributes to the field of human-robot interaction by implementing validated support mechanisms into a robotic system as its emotional responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose that social robots can enhance their social abilities by supporting peoples' emotional needs. We examined this concept by implementing four different mechanisms aimed at providing Emotional Support in a personal drone. These mechanisms (Affective Empathy, Cognitive Empathy, Positive Emotion Regulation (PER), and a Reasoning mechanism (yoU-turn)) provide various aspects of support ranging on the Emotional-Reasoning spectrum. In an online study (N = 95), first, participants were asked to sequentially recall situations where they experienced one of six emotional states (i.e., being calm, bored, excited, hyperactivated, scared, or sleepy).
Following each induced emotion, participants ranked their preferred drone response to their specific emotional state. Results indicate that participants' preferences were based on the valence of their emotional state, emphasizing the need for social drones to have multiple response mechanisms to support their users. This work contributes to the field of human-robot interaction by implementing validated support mechanisms into a robotic system as its emotional responses.
增强人机交互中的情感支持:在个人无人机上实现情感调节机制
我们提出社交机器人可以通过支持人们的情感需求来增强他们的社交能力。我们通过实施四种不同的机制来检验这一概念,这些机制旨在为个人无人机提供情感支持。这些机制(情感共情、认知共情、积极情绪调节(PER)和推理机制(u -turn))在情绪-推理范围内提供了不同方面的支持。在一项在线研究中(N = 95),首先,参与者被要求按顺序回忆他们经历过的六种情绪状态之一的情景(即冷静、无聊、兴奋、过度活跃、害怕或困倦)。在每种诱导情绪之后,参与者根据自己的特定情绪状态对自己喜欢的无人机反应进行排名。结果表明,参与者的偏好是基于他们情绪状态的效价,这强调了社交无人机需要有多种反应机制来支持他们的用户。这项工作通过在机器人系统中实施有效的支持机制作为其情感反应,为人机交互领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信